In this article the legal construction is considered as a method of cognition, interpretation of law and as means of law-making technique at the same time. The author outlines the legal construction of the financial liability and provides with its structural and substantive description. The author offers to consider the legal construction of the financial liability as an inter-branch construction that combines private law constructions and public law constructions of monetary obligations. The majority of these constructions have a complex structure, where each party has the right to claim the completion of obligations and duty to complete these obligations at the same time. In this case, the majority of studied constructions of civil obligations are characterized by counter retribution while public law constructions by counter gratuitousness. The structural elements of this inter-branch construction are subjects, object and conditions of the obligation. The paper analyzes maintenance of selected structural elements. Using the method of scientific abstraction it is proposed to allocate General and Special conditions of financial liabilities. Special conditions of financial liabilities depend on the peculiarities of private law and public law regulations and on target orientation of liabilities (on the formation or on the expenditure of public funds). The author focuses on the target characteristic of structural elements of financial liabilities legal constructions. It is proposed to allocate the total and the direct target orientation of the financial liability.
legal construction, financial liability, monetary obligation, monetary duty, financial law.
1. Agarkov M. M. Obyazatel´stvo po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu. M., 1940.
2. Aleksandrov N. G. Yuridicheskaya norma i pravootnoshenie. M., 1947.
3. Alekseev S. S. O strukturno slozhnykh pravootnosheniyakh. Izbrannoe. M., 2003.
4. Alekseev S. S. Pravo. Azbuka. Teoriya. Filosofiya. Opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya. M., 1998.
5. Babichev I. V. Munitsipal´noe pravo: sistemno-strukturnyy analiz yuridicheskikh konstruktsiy. M., 2010.
6. Bataykin P. A. K voprosu ob effektivnosti yuridicheskikh konstruktsiy grazhdansko-pravovoy otrasli. Pravo i ekonomika. 2013. № 12.
7. Belikov E. G. Raskhodnye obyazatel´stva publichno-pravovykh obrazovaniy v sotsial´noy sfere. Finansovoe pravo. 2015. № 5.
8. Bogdanov D. V. K voprosu o yuridicheskikh konstruktsiyakh v nalogovom prave. Finansovoe pravo. 2010. № 11.
9. Vasil´ev A. A. Konservativnaya pravovaya doktrina Rossii: obshcheteoreticheskie aspekty: monografiya. M., 2012.
10. Grigor´ev A. S. Konstruktsiya nalogovogo obyazatel´stvennogo pravootnosheniya i problemy ustraneniya mezhdunarodnogo dvoynogo nalogooblozheniya. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2011. № 5.
11. Gurvich M. A. K voprosu o predmete nauki grazhdanskogo protsessa. Uchenye zapiski VIYuN. M., 1955. Vyp. 4.
12. David R., Zhoffre-Spinozi K. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti / per. s fr. V. A. Tumanova. M., 1999.
13. Davydova M. L. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. Volgograd, 2009.
14. Eliseev V. S. Teoriya ekonomicheskikh obyazatel´stv: pravovoe obespechenie i zashchita imushchestvennogo interesa. M., 2009.
15. Ivanova V. N. Yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya naloga kak faktor sovershenstvovaniya nalogovogo zakonodatel´stva: avtoref. dis.... d-ra yurid. nauk. Voronezh, 2010.
16. Ivanchin A. V. Ugolovno-pravovye konstruktsii i ikh rol´ v postroenii ugolovnogo zakonodatel´stva: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2003.
17. Komyagin D. L. Raskhodnye obyazatel´stva: kontrol´naya i prognosticheskaya funktsii. Finansovoe pravo. 2011. № 7.
18. Kruglikov L. L., Spiridonova R. E. Yuridicheskie konstruktsii i simvoly v ugolovnom prave. SPb., 2005.
19. Kulakov V. V. Obyazatel´stvo i oslozhneniya ego struktury v grazhdanskom prave Rossii: monografiya. M., 2011.
20. Kucherov I. I. K voprosu o yuridicheskikh konstruktsiyakh nalogov i sborov. Finansovoe pravo. 2010. № 1.
21. Luneva E. V. Grazhdansko-pravovoe sredstvo i yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya: sootnoshenie ponyatiy. Yuridicheskiy mir. 2015. № 8.
22. Mamatkazin I. R. Sotsial´no-obespechitel´nye pravootnosheniya i konstruktsii pravootnosheniy. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2014. № 2.
23. Novoselova L. A. Protsenty po denezhnym obyazatel´stvam. M., 2000.
24. Omelekhina N. V. Denezhnoe obyazatel´stvo kak mezhotraslevoy institut. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. «Pravo». 2015. T. 11. № 2.
25. Omelekhina N. V. Denezhnye obyazatel´stva v sisteme finansovykh pravootnosheniy. Novosibirsk, 2015.
26. Omelekhina N. V. Denezhnye obyazatel´stva v finansovoy deyatel´nosti publichno-pravovykh obrazovaniy. Finansovoe pravo. 2015. № 6.
27. Omelekhina N. V. Obyazyvanie v sisteme finansovo-pravovogo regulirovaniya. Denezhnaya obyazannost´ kak forma pozitivnogo obyazyvaniya. Novosibirsk, 2014.
28. Pan´ko K. K. Yuridicheskie konstruktsii kak kategorii vnutrenney formy (struktury) ugolovnogo prava. Pravo i politika. 2005. № 3.
29. Povetkina N. A. Byudzhetnoe zakonodatel´stvo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: perspektivy razvitiya. Finansovoe pravo. 2015. № 9.
30. Ponomarev D. E. Genezis i sushchnost´ yuridicheskoy konstruktsii: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2005.
31. Rozhkova M. A. K voprosu o dinamike obyazatel´stv. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul´tantPlyus». 2002.
32. Sapun V. A. Yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya kak pravovoe sredstvo yuridicheskoy tekhniki. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2003. № 7 (ch. 2).
33. Serkova Yu. A. Ponyatie yuridicheskoy konstruktsii i ego metodologicheskoe znachenie v issledovanii pravovykh sistem. Yuridicheskiy mir. 2013. № 7.
34. Smirnikova Yu. L. Neopredelennost´ yuridicheskoy konstruktsii otvetstvennosti za netselevoe ispol´zovanie byudzhetnykh sredstv (sootnoshenie norm KoAP RF i BK RF). Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2009. № 4.
35. Tarasov N. N. Metodologicheskie problemy sovremennogo pravovedeniya: avtoref. dis.... d-ra yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2002.
36. Tarasov N. N. Metodologicheskie problemy yuridicheskoy nauki. Ekaterinburg, 2001.
37. Fogel´son Yu. B. Izbrannye voprosy obshchey teorii obyazatel´stv: kurs lektsiy. M., 2001.
38. Khabrieva T. Ya. Ekonomiko-pravovoy analiz: metodologicheskiy podkhod. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2010. № 12.
39. Khalabudenko O. A. Dogovor kak yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya v kontekste predmeta grazhdanskogo prava. Aktual´nye problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel´stva, pravoprimeneniya i pravovykh teoriy v Rossii i za rubezhom: mater. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (20 noyabrya 2008 g.): v 2 t. T. 2: Gosudarstvenno-pravovaya sektsiya. Grazhdansko-pravovaya sektsiya / pod red. V. L. Kudryavtseva. Chelyabinsk, 2008.
40. Khalabudenko O. A. Nekotorye voprosy metodologii prava: grazhdansko-pravovye prerogativy i yuridicheskie konstruktsii. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2013. № 1.
41. Khavanova I. A. O teorii ekonomicheskogo analiza v nalogovom prave (kontseptual´nye osnovy). Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 5.
42. Khokhlov V. A. Obshchie polozheniya ob obyazatel´stvakh: ucheb. posobie. M., 2015.
43. Chevychelov V. V. K voprosu o ponyatii yuridicheskoy konstruktsii. Gosudarstvennaya vlast´ i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2005. № 11.
44. Chevychelov V. V. Yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya (problemy teorii i praktiki): avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2005.
45. Chelyshev M. Yu. O yuridicheskikh konstruktsiyakh v proekte izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Grazhdanskiy kodeks RossiyskoyFederatsii. Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2013. № 1.
46. Chervonyuk V. I. Yuridicheskie konstruktsii v strukture prava. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. № 7 (ch. 2).
47. Cherdantsev A. F. Logiko-yazykovye fenomeny v yurisprudentsii: monografiya. M., 2012.
48. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika / pod red. T. Ya. Khabrievoy, N. A. Vlasenko. M., 2009.
