Stat'ya posvyaschena voprosam formirovaniya klasterov v prigranichnyh regionah Rossii. Aktual'nost' problem sozdaniya regional'nyh klasterov v strane opredelyaetsya slozhnost'yu slozhivsheysya v poslednie gody ekonomicheskoy situacii, svyazannoy s sankciyami, vvedennymi v otnoshenii RF, i slabym razvitiem importozamescheniya. Fenomen klastera stal rassmatrivat'sya kak vazhnyy faktor ekonomicheskogo razvitiya nekotoroy territorii tol'ko vo vtoroy polovine XX veka, hotya promyshlennye klastery kak vzaimosvyazannaya ekonomicheskaya deyatel'nost' predpriyatiy izvestny esche so vremen remeslennichestva. V bolee rannih rabotah na temu klasterov konkretno ne upominalos', chto podrazumevaet termin «prigranichnyy klaster». Osnovyvayas' na klassicheskom opredelenii klastera Maykla Portera, avtorami predlozheno sobstvennoe opredelenie prigranichnogo klastera. Opredeleny vozmozhnosti, usloviya i algoritm sozdaniya klasterov v regione. Proveden SWOT-analiz, pozvolivshiy vyyavit' usloviya i vozmozhnosti formirovaniya prigranichnyh klasterov s privlecheniem predpriyatiy Rossii i prigranichnyh gosudarstv. Klastery mozhno rassmatrivat' kak odnu iz form mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva. Avtory obraschayut vnimanie na to, chto formirovanie prigranichnyh klasterov sposobstvuet usileniyu rossiysko-evropeyskogo ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva. V rabote opredeleny napravleniya uchastiya prigranichnyh territoriy Leningradskoy oblasti s sosednimi gosudarstvami. Na osnove analiza usloviy i vozmozhnostey formirovaniya i razvitiya prigranichnyh klasterov v Leningradskoy oblasti, social'no-ekonomicheskih otnosheniy s prigranichnymi gosudarstvami, avtorami predlozheny napravleniya formirovaniya perspektivnyh prigranichnyh klasterov: gostepriimstva, himicheskoy, derevoobrabatyvayuschey i metalloobrabatyvayuschey promyshlennosti.
klaster, prigranichnyy klaster, region, forsayt
1. Vorobyova, I. N. (2014). Klasternyj podhod k ekonomicheskomu razvitiju prigranichnyh regionov v uslovijah Tamozhennogo sojuza Rossii, Kazahstana i Belorussii [The Cluster Approach to Economic Development of the Border Regions under the Customs Union of Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus]. Izvestija Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Pedagogika i psihologija. Pravo. Filologija i iskusstvovedenie. Filosofija, sociologija i kul'turologija. Ekonomika [Izvestiya of Altai State University. Series: pedagogy and psychology, law, philology and study of art, philosophy, sociology and culture studies, economics], 2(2), 297-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2014)2.2-57. (In Russ.).
2. Gibezh, A. A. (2006). Derevjannoe domostroenie kak osnova klastera [Wooden housing construction as the basis of the cluster]. In Problemy strategii i taktiki regional'nogo razvitija [Strat-egies and Tactics of Regional Development]: Proceedings of the Vth Russian Scientific Conference, Vologda, January 25-27, 2006. Part II. Vologda: VNKC CEMI RAS. (In Russ.).
3. Efimychev, Yu. I., & Zaharov, I. V. (2008). Promyshlennye klastery i ekonomicheskij rost [Indus-trial clusters and economic growth]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Serija: Ekonomika i finansy [Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series Economics and finance], 1, 15-18. (In Russ.).
4. Ioffe, O. (2009). Klasternyj podhod [Cluster approach]. Gubernskij delovoj zhurnal [Provincial Business Journal], 11, 18-23. (In Russ.).
5. Krjukov, S. V. (2010). Forsajt: ot prognoza k formirovaniju budushhego [Foresight: from the forecast to the formation of the future]. Terra Economicus, 8(3-2), 7-17. (In Russ.).
6. Kuznetsova, T. A., Tashkinov, A. A., & Cherkasov, V. D. (2011). Nacional'nyj issledovatel'skij universitet kak centr innovacionnoj dejatel'nosti [National research university as a center for innovation]. Regionologija [Regionology], 75(2), 122-134. (In Russ.).
7. Mikhaylov, A. S., Mikhaylova, A. A. (2012). O vozmozhnostjah rossijskogo uchastija v formiro-vanii transgranichnyh innovacionnyh klasterov na Baltike [On the Possibilities of Russian Participation in the Formation of Transboundary Innovation Clusters in the Baltic]. Ekonomika, upravlenie, finansy [Economics, management, finance]: Materials II Intern. Sc. Conf. (Perm, December 2012). Perm: Mercury. (In Russ.).
8. Morozova, L. S., Bolshakov, A. I. (2012). Классификация приграничных туристских кластеров [Near-border tourist cluster classification]. Servis v Rossii i za rubezhom [Services in Russia and Abroad], 11(38), 33-40. (In Russ.).
9. Pilipenko, I. V. (2007). Klasternaja politika v Rossii [Cluster Policy in Russia]. Obshhestvo i ekonomika [Society and Economics], 8, 28-64. (In Russ.).
10. Tarasenko, V. V. (2015). Territorial'nye klastery: sem' instrumentov upravlenija [Territorial clusters: Seven management tools]. Moscow: Alpina Pablisher. (In Russ.).
11. Enright, M. (2000). Survey on the Characterization of Regional Clusters: Initial Results [Working Paper Institute of Economic Policy and Business Strategy: Competitiveness Program University of Hong Kong and the Competitiveness Institute]. Barcelona.
12. Otero, M. S., McCoshan, A., & Junge, K. (2005). European Inventory on Validation of non-formal and informal learning. A Final Report to DG Education & Culture of the European Commission. URL: http://www2.cedefop.europa.eu/etv/Information_resources/EuropeanInventory /publications/inventory/european_inventory_2005_final_report.pdf. (Accessed on November 8, 2016).
13. Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
