Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Concepts of team roles in making implementing of decisions in the process of teamwork and communicative roles in situations of rumors discussing are compared. Differences and similarities in the categories of roles, content of role repertoires, functioning at key stages of interaction are analyzed. The fundamental difference in understanding the concept of «role» as a situationally conditioned, when discussing rumors, and based on individual dispositions of team members is determined. The hypothesis of «role balance», which determines the completeness of the representation in the group of all roles as predictor of the effectiveness of solving a common problem, is considered.
roles, team roles, communicative roles, role balance, rumors, counteraction to rumors, effectiveness of interaction.
В современной психологии управления социальные роли в их традиционном понимании поведения, определяемого статусами индивидов [14], противопоставляются командным ролям (team roles), описывающим особенности функционирования членов рабочих групп, «взаимодополняющих и взаимозаменяющих друг друга в ходе достижения общей цели» [5, с. 11].
1. Belbin R.M. Komandy menedzherov. Sekrety uspekha i prichiny neudach [Teams of managers.Secrets of success and causes of failure]. Moscow, HIPPO Publ., 2003. 315 p. (in Russian)
2. Belbin R.M. Effektivnye menedzhery: sekret ikh uspekha s pozitsii teorii komandnykh rolei [Effective managers: The secret of their success in terms of the theory of team roles]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 24. Menedzhment [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 24.Management]. 2010, I. 1, pp. 11-25. (in Russian)
3. Voskresenskaia L.I., Rybina T.A. Sposoby perevoda terminov, oboznachaiushchikh sviazi rolevoi struktury gruppy v menedzhmente [Methods for translating terms that denote the relationship between the role structure of a group in management]. Omskii nauchnyi vestnik [Omsk Scientific Bulletin]. 2007, I. 6 (62), pp. 114-117. (in Russian)
4. Krichevskii R.L., Dubovskaia E.M. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie aspekty komandoobrazovaniia [Social and psychological aspects of teambuilding]. Sotsial'naia psikhologiia maloi gruppy [Social psychology of a small group]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2001, pp. 277-290. (in Russian)
5. Khasina P.L. Rolevoi sostav komandy i dinamika ee effektivnosti. Kand. Diss. [Roles of the team and dynamics of its effectiveness. Cand. Diss.]. Moscow, 2011. 22 p. (in Russian)
6. Khasina P.L. Problema sootnosheniia sostava rabochei komandy i ee effektivnosti [The problem of the relation of the composition of the working team and its effectiveness]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of Psychology]. 2011, I. 5, pp. 132-143. (in Russian)
7. Aritzeta A., Ayestaran S., Swailes S.Team role preference and conflict management styles // The International Journal of Conflict Management. 2005. Vol. 16, I. 2, pp. 157-182.
8. Benne K.D., Sheats P. Functional roles of group members // The Journal of Social Issues. 1948. Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 42-47.
9. Chong E. Role balance and team development: A study of team role characteristics underlying high and low performing teams // Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management. 2007. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 202-217.
10. DiFonzo N., Bordia P. Rumor psychology: Social and organizational approaches. Washington, DC: APA, 2007. 292 p.
11. DuBrin A.J. The breakthrough team player. N.Y.: American Management Association, 1995. 192 p.
12. Jensen A.D., Chilberg J.C. Small group communication: Theory and application. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Pub., 1991. 430 p.
13. Kapferer J.-N. Rumors: Uses, interpretations and images. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press, 1990. 284 p.
14. Linton R. Status and role // The study of man: An introduction. N.Y.: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., 1936, pp. 113-131.
15. Margerison C., McCann D. Team management: Practical new approaches. L.: Management Books, 2000. 176 p.
16. Mathieu J.E., Tannenbaum S.I., Kukenberger M.R., Donsbach J.S., Alliger G.M. Team role experience and orientation: A measure and tests of construct validity // Group&Organization Management. 2015. Vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 6-34.
17. Mumford T.V., van Iddekinge C.H., Morgeson F.P., Campion M.A. The team role test: Development and validation of a team role knowledge situational judgment test // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2008. Vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 250-267.
18. Parker G.M. Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy. Oxford: Jossey-Bass, 1990. 208 p.
19. Partington D., Harris H. Team role balance and team performance: an empirical study // Journal of Management Development. 1999. Vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 694-705.
20. Prichard J.S., Stanton N.A. Testing Belbin’s team role theory of effective groups // Journal of Management Development. 1999. Vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 652-665.
21. Senior B. Team roles and team performance: Is there really a link? // Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 1997. Vol. 70, pp. 241-258.
22. Shibutani T. Improvised news: A sociological study of rumor. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966. 262 p.
