Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
employee
Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
Based on cross-sectional data, the relationships between labor productivity, socio-economic factors and innovative factors in the Russian regions are estimated. It is established that the development trends of the country's economy are contradictory. The spread of higher and secondary vocational education in the regions, the number of university students do not have a significant impact on labor productivity, the number of university faculty, graduate and doctoral students have a negative impact on labor productivity, which contradicts the conditions for the development of a post-industrial economy. The absence of the influence of the release of new goods, the positive effect on labor productivity of income inequality, the negative impact of the export of machinery and equipment, the reduction of the influence of advanced production technologies, the export of technologies and technical services, the import of technologies and technical services indicate the development of an industrial economy. The positive effect on the productivity of foreign investment, the saturation of enterprises and organizations with computers, including Internet access, the number of personnel engaged in research and development, the growing influence of the number of staff with advanced degrees, and the import of machinery and equipment indicate that the country and some trends in the development of the new economy. The discovered positive effect of inflation on labor productivity of inflation, and the growing effect of inflation on the market for industrial goods, indicates problems in monetary policy.
productivity, socio-economic, innovative factors, industrial economy, post-industrial economy
1. Basovskiy L.E., Basovskaya E.N. Postindustrial'nye uklady v ekonomike Rossii. M.: INFRA-M, 2017. 159 s.
2. Rastvorceva S.N. Proizvoditel'nost' truda i fondovooruzhennost' v obespechenii ekonomicheskogo rosta rossiyskih regionov // Social'noe prostranstvo, 2018. № 1. S. 1-9.
3. Kirilyuk I.L. Modeli proizvodstvennyh funkciy dlya rossiyskoy ekonomiki // Komp'yuternye issledovaniya i modelirovanie. 2013. № 2. S. 293-312.
4. Afanas'eva A.A., Ponomarevoy O.S. Proizvodstvennaya funkciya narodnogo hozyaystva Rossii v 1990-2012 gg. // Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. 2014. № 4. S. 21-33.
5. Makarov V.L., Ayvazyan S.A., Afanas'ev M.Yu, Bahtizin A.R, Nanavyan A.M. Ocenka effektivnosti regionov RF s uchetom intellektual'nogo kapitala, harakteristik gotovnosti k innovaciyam, urovnya blagosostoyaniya i kachestva zhizni naseleniya // Ekonomika regionov. 2014. № 4. S.9-30.
6. Mamonov M.E., Pestova A.A. Analiz tehnicheskoy effektivnosti nacional'nyh ekonomik: rol' institutov, infrastruktury i resursnoy renty // Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy associacii.2015. № 3. S. 44-78.
7. Mankiw N., Romer D., Weil D. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1992. Vol. 107. № 2. P. 407-437.
8. Barro R., Lee J. Sources of Economic Growth (with comments from Nancy Stokey) // Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. 1994. Vol. 40. P. 1-57.
9. Merphy K., Shleifer A., Vishny R. The Allocation of Talent: Implication for Growth // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1991. Vol. 106. № 2. P. 503-530.
10. Khalafalla Ahmed Mohamed Arabi, Suliman Zakaria Suliman Abdalla. The Impact of Human Capital on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Sudan // Research in World Economy. 2013. Vol. 4, No. 2. P. 104-136.
11. Ferdi Kesikoglu. Relationship Between Human Capital and Economic Growth: Panel Causality Analysis for Selected OECD Countries // Journal of Economic and Social Studies. 2013.V.3. No. 1. P. 1-24.
12. Ramey G., Ramey A. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link Between Volatility and Growth // American Economic Review. 1995. Vol. 85. No. 5. 1139-1151.
13. Basovskiy L.E., Basovskaya E.N. Issledovanie ekonomiki regionov Rossii: ekonometricheskiy podhod // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika. 2014. №. 2. S. 13-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/3648
14. Zhuravleva N.A. Cifrovaya ekonomika kak osnova ekonomiki vysokih skorostey // Transportnye sistemy i tehnologii. 2017. № 2 (8). S. 47-49
15. Yakutin Yu.V. Rossiyskaya ekonomika: strategiya cifrovoy transformacii (k konstruktivnoy kritike pravitel'stvennoy programmy «cifrovaya ekonomika Rossiyskoy Federacii») // Menedzhment i biznes-administrirovanie. 2017. № 4. S. 27-52.
16. Zubarev A.E. Cifrovaya ekonomika kak forma proyavleniya zakonomernostey razvitiya novoy ekonomiki // Vestnik tihookeanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. № 4 (47). S. 177-184.
17. Evtyanova D.V. Kriterii sozdaniya cifrovyh platform upravleniya ekonomikoy // Ekonomicheskie sistemy. 2017. № 3 (38). S. 54-57.
18. Basovskiy L.E., Averina T.N., Basovskaya E.N. Osnovnye faktory proizvoditel'nosti truda v regionah Rossii // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomi-ka. 2019. №. 5. S. 9-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5dad9ccb3c25e0.76807110
19. Basovskiy L.E., Basovskaya E.N., Grishina S.A., Shishkin A.N. Nekotorye osnovnye faktory proizvoditel'nosti truda v regionah Rossii // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika. 2019. №. 5. S. 18-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5dad9e1f369f07.36235586
