ISSUES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE ON THE USE OF SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR PHOTO AND VIDEO RECORDING FOR IMPOSING ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY FOR TRAFFIC VIOLATION: COMPARATIVE AND LEGAL ANALYSIS OF LEGAL RULES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY IN THE RUSSIAN AND FOREIGN LAW
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
This article deals with the problem of using special technical equipment for automatic recording of traffic violations. The article draws attention to certain important issues concerning administrative liability of vehicle possessors (owners), when a traffic violation is recorded by special automatic equipment, in particular: special characteristics of a subject of administrative offense, exceptions to the «presumption of innocence» principle; peculiarities of administrative proceedings in such cases. When writing this article the authors used the method of comparative legal analysis. The article contains comparative analysis of administrative legal rules of the Russian Federation, and those of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Belarus. The main conclusion of the study performed is that lawmakers have not sufficiently examined the issue of imposing administrative liability on vehicle owners for the offenses, recorded by special technical equipment, operating in the automatic mode, which leads to some problematic aspects in legal regulation of relevant administrative relations.

Keywords:
Administrative offense, photo recording of administrative offenses, presumption of guilt, subject of administrative offense, liability of vehicle owners, video recording of administrative offenses, traffic rules, administrative law of the Federal Republic of Germany, Administrative Law of the Republic of Belarus, transport.
References

1. Aktuell: Neue Radar-Anlagen in der Schweiz. URL: http://www.law-news.ch.

2. Gesetz über Ordnungswidrigkeiten 24.05.1968. BGBl. 1968. I. 481.

3. Zyryanov S. M. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost´ v sisteme publichno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 1.

4. Kuz´micheva G. A., Molchanov P. V., Studenikina M. S. Prezumptsiya nevinovnosti i administrativnaya otvetstvennost´ za narushenie pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya. Bezopasnost´ dorozhnogo dvizheniya: sb. nauch. tr. 2011. Vyp. 11.

5. Molchanov P. V. Sobstvennik (vladelets) transportnogo sredstva kak sub´´ekt administrativnoy otvetstvennosti. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2010. № 3.

6. Rossinskiy B. V. O neobkhodimosti izmeneniya redaktsii statey Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, reglamentiruyushchikh naznachenie administrativnykh nakazaniy sobstvennikam (vladel´tsam) transportnykh sredstv. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2011. № 1.

7. Sistema izmereniy skorosti dvizheniya transportnykh sredstv «Avtodoriya». URL: http://avtodoria.ru/about.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?