Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения 1991-3222 2587-9995 10904 10.12737/18172 ГОСУДАРСТВО И ПРАВО В СОВРЕМЕННОМ МИРЕ: ПРОБЛЕМЫ ТЕОРИИ И ИСТОРИИ STATE AND LAW IN MODERN WORLD: PROBLEMS OF THEORY AND HISTORY ГОСУДАРСТВО И ПРАВО В СОВРЕМЕННОМ МИРЕ: ПРОБЛЕМЫ ТЕОРИИ И ИСТОРИИ FEATURES OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENT IN THE ROMAN-GERMAN SYSTEM OF LAW ОСОБЕННОСТИ СУДЕБНОГО ПРЕЦЕДЕНТА В СИСТЕМЕ РОМАНО-ГЕРМАНСКОГО ПРАВА Марченко Михаил Николаевич Marchenko Mikhail Николаевич theory@law.msu.su 11 03 2016 11 03 2016 2 1 http://jzsp.ru/articles/article-2386.pdf

В статье рассматриваются вопросы, касающиеся основных черт и особенностей судебного прецедента в системе романо-германского права по сравнению с «классическим» прецедентом — источником англосаксонского права. Среди особенностей судебного прецедента в системе романо-германского права выделяются: многозначность самого явления прецедента и его континентальной доктрины и понятия; вторичный и двойственный характер прецедента по сравнению с другими источниками права данной правовой семьи; избирательное отношение к различным отраслям права; разнородность правовой основы прецедентов в разных странах и дифференцированность подхода к признанию за прецедентами юридической силы. Отмечены также технико-юридические особенности прецедента в системе романо-германского права, в частности особый характер публикаций решений высших судебных инстанций и др. Основные черты и особенности судебного прецедента и его доктрины в романо-германском праве раскрываются на примере судебных прецедентов Германии, Франции, Испании, Италии и некоторых других государств.

The article deals with the main features and characteristics of judicial precedent in the Roman-German law system in comparison with the “classical” precedent — a source of Anglo-Saxon law. Among the features of the system of judicial precedent in the Roman-German law are the following: ambiguity of the phenomenon of precedent and its continental doctrine and concepts; secondary and dual nature of the precedent over other sources of law of that legal family; selective attitude to different branches of law; diversity of the legal basis of precedents in different countries and differentiated approach to the recognition of legal effect of precedents. The technical and legal aspects of a precedent in the system of the Roman-German law, in particular the special nature of the publications of decisions of the higher courts and others are pointed out. The main features and characteristics of judicial precedent and its doctrine in the Roman-German law are disclosed by the example of case law of Germany, France, Spain, Italy and some other countries.

 Прецедент романо-германское право доктрина толкование права судейское право источники права. Precedent Roman-German law doctrine interpretation of law judicial law sources of law.

Alexy R. A Theory of Legal Argumentation. Oxford, 1989. Alexy R. A Theory of Legal Argumentation. Oxford, 1989. Adrnio A. Precedent in Finland // Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Adrnio A. Precedent in Finland. Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Berman P. The Globalization of Jurisdiction // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 2002. No. 2. Berman P. The Globalization of Jurisdiction. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 2002. No. 2. Certoma G. The Italian Legal System. L., 1985. Certoma G. The Italian Legal System. L., 1985. Chorus J., Gerner P., Hondurs E., Koekkoek A. (eds.). Introduction to Dutch Law for Foreign Lawyers. Boston, 1993. Chorus J., Gerner P., Hondurs E., Koekkoek A. (eds.). Introduction to Dutch Law for Foreign Lawyers. Boston, 1993. Chorus J., Gerver P., Hondurs E., Koekkoek A. Introduction to Dutch Law. Boston, 1993. Chorus J., Gerver P., Hondurs E., Koekkoek A. Introduction to Dutch Law. Boston, 1993. Chorus J., Gerver P., Hondurs E., Koekkoek A. (eds.). Introduction to Dutch Law for Foreign Lawyers. Kluwer, 1993. Chorus J., Gerver P., Hondurs E., Koekkoek A. (eds.). Introduction to Dutch Law for Foreign Lawyers. Kluwer, 1993. Cornu G. (eds.). Vocabulaire Juridique. P., 1990. Cornu G. (eds.). Vocabulaire Juridique. P., 1990. Cruz P. Modern Approach to Comparative Law. Boston, 1993. Cruz P. Modern Approach to Comparative Law. Boston, 1993. Ekhoff T. The Doctrine of the Sources of Law. Oslo, 1993. Ekhoff T. The Doctrine of the Sources of Law. Oslo, 1993. Feitel R. Comparative Constitutional Law in a Global Age // Harvard Law Review. 2004. No. 8. Feitel R. Comparative Constitutional Law in a Global Age. Harvard Law Review. 2004. No. 8. Further General Reflections and Conclusions // Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Further General Reflections and Conclusions. Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. German O. Pra-judizien als Rechtsquelle. Stockholm, 1960. German O. Pra-judizien als Rechtsquelle. Stockholm, 1960. Glendon M., Gordon M., Osakwe Ch. Comparative Legal Traditions in Nutshell. St. Paul, 1994. Glendon M., Gordon M., Osakwe Ch. Comparative Legal Traditions in Nutshell. St. Paul, 1994. Green Gonas C. The Scandinavian Legal System. An Introduction // Comparative Juridical Review. 1990. Vol. 27. Green Gonas C. The Scandinavian Legal System. An Introduction. Comparative Juridical Review. 1990. Vol. 27. Gutteridge H. Comparative Law: Introduction to the Comparative Method of Legal Study and Research. Cambridge, 1949. Gutteridge H. Comparative Law: Introduction to the Comparative Method of Legal Study and Research. Cambridge, 1949. Hahn H. Trends in the Jurisprudence of the German Federal Constitutional Court // The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1968-69. Vol. 16. Hahn H. Trends in the Jurisprudence of the German Federal Constitutional Court. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1968-69. Vol. 16. Instuitional Factors Influencing Precedents // Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Instuitional Factors Influencing Precedents. Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Kourilsky Ch., Racz A. Ch., Schaffer H. (eds.). The Sources of Law. A Comparative Empirical Study. Budapest, 1982. Kourilsky Ch., Racz A. Ch., Schaffer H. (eds.). The Sources of Law. A Comparative Empirical Study. Budapest, 1982. Larenz C. Uber die Bindunswirkung von Pra-judizien // H. Fasching und W. Kralik (Hrsg.). Festschrift fur H. Schima. Viena, 1969. Larenz C. Uber die Bindunswirkung von Pra-judizien. H. Fasching und W. Kralik (Hrsg.). Festschrift fur H. Schima. Viena, 1969. Lilie H. Obiter Dictum und Divergenzausgleich in Strafsachen. Berlin, 1993. Lilie H. Obiter Dictum und Divergenzausgleich in Strafsachen. Berlin, 1993. Merryman J. The Civil War Tradition. Stanford, 1992. Merryman J. The Civil War Tradition. Stanford, 1992. Mubgnug R. Das Allgemeine Verwaltungsrecht Zwischen Richterrecht und Gesetzesrecht // Richterliche Rechtsfortbildung, Festschrift der Juristischen Fakultat zur 600 Iahr Feier der Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg. Heidelberg, 1986. Mubgnug R. Das Allgemeine Verwaltungsrecht Zwischen Richterrecht und Gesetzesrecht. Richterliche Rechtsfortbildung, Festschrift der Juristischen Fakultat zur 600 Iahr Feier der Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg. Heidelberg, 1986. Precedent in France // Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Precedent in France. Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Precedent in Norway // Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Precedent in Norway. Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Precedent in Spain // Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Precedent in Spain. Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Precedent in Sweden// Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Precedent in Sweden// Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Precedent in the Federal Republic of Germany // Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Precedent in the Federal Republic of Germany. Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Rearson E. Law for European Business Studies. L., 1994. Rearson E. Law for European Business Studies. L., 1994. Saarenpaa A. Court Decisions as the Focus of Study // Scandinavian Studies in Law. 1984. Vol. 28. Saarenpaa A. Court Decisions as the Focus of Study. Scandinavian Studies in Law. 1984. Vol. 28. Schluter W. Das obiter Dictum. Munich, 1973. Schluter W. Das obiter Dictum. Munich, 1973. Schutze R. An Introduction to European Law. Cambridge, 2015. Schutze R. An Introduction to European Law. Cambridge, 2015. Taruffo M., La Torre M. Precedent in Italy // Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Taruffo M., La Torre M. Precedent in Italy. Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study / eds. by D. MacCormick, R. Summers. Sydney, 1997. Timonen P. Doctrine of the Sources of Law of Scholar and of a Judge // Scandinavian Studies in Law. 1990. Vol. 34. Timonen P. Doctrine of the Sources of Law of Scholar and of a Judge. Scandinavian Studies in Law. 1990. Vol. 34. Weller H. Die Beteutung der Prajudizien im Verstandis der Deutschen Rechts Wissensvaft. Berlin, 1979. Weller H. Die Beteutung der Prajudizien im Verstandis der Deutschen Rechts Wissensvaft. Berlin, 1979. Богдановская И. Ю. Закон и судебный прецедент: эволюция борьбы за верховенство // Российское правосудие. 2015. № 9. Bogdanovskaya I. Yu. Zakon i sudebnyy pretsedent: evolyutsiya bor´by za verkhovenstvo. Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2015. № 9. Гук П. А. Судебный прецедент: теория и практика. М., 2009. Guk P. A. Sudebnyy pretsedent: teoriya i praktika. M., 2009. Демченко А. Судебный прецедент. Варшава, 1903. Demchenko A. Sudebnyy pretsedent. Varshava, 1903. Ершов В. В. Судебный прецедент толкования права? // Российское правосудие. 2013. № 9. Ershov V. V. Sudebnyy pretsedent tolkovaniya prava?. Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2013. № 9. Марченко М. Н. Источники права. М., 2005. Marchenko M. N. Istochniki prava. M., 2005.