Scientific Research and Development. Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology Scientific Research and Development. Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology Научные исследования и разработки. Социально-гуманитарные исследования и технологии 2306-1731 2587-912X 45889 10.12737/2306-1731-2021-10-3-93-100 ЖИЗНЬ НАУКИ: ОБСУЖДАЕМ НОВЫЕ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЕ ОБЛАСТИ LIFE OF SCIENCE: DISCUSSING NEW EDUCATIONAL AREAS ЖИЗНЬ НАУКИ: ОБСУЖДАЕМ НОВЫЕ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЕ ОБЛАСТИ The Strengthening and Reproduction of Stereotypes: Ethical Considerations in Conducting Research Укрепление и воспроизведение стереотипов: этические соображения при проведении исследований https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7169-2153 Мясоедов А. И. Myasoedov Aleksey Ivanovich retvil@mail.ru Тольяттинский государственный университет Togliatti State University 10 3 93 100 15 09 2021 https://zh-szf.ru/en/nauka/article/45889/view

Многие социологи интересуются изучением стереотипов и стереотипных рассуждений. Этот интерес часто проистекает из желания внести свой вклад в создание более справедливого и равноправного общества. Когда ученые проектируют и проводят исследования, они заняты проведением эффективных исследований в соответствии с критериями исследования. Однако когда ученые изучают стереотипы и стереотипные рассуждения, они рискуют воспроизвести и, возможно, даже усилить эти процессы, и тем самым нанести вред отдельным людям или группам людей. Ученые постоянно сталкиваются с методологическими препятствиями, которые приходится преодолевать, чтобы продвигать исследования наиболее эффективным образом. Однако иногда ученые оказываются в ситуациях, когда проведение эффективного исследования может противоречить этическим соображениям или принципам. Исследовательские проекты, изучающие стереотипы и стереотипные рассуждения, подпадать под эту категорию. Дебаты по этому этическому вопросу в основном принимают форму общих дискуссий по этике исследования и взвешивания цели исследования с учетом потенциального вреда для участников. Хотя эти размышления чрезвычайно важны, необходимо обсудить, как этот этический вопрос может быть решен на практике. Целью данной статьи является разработка комплекса практических рекомендаций по решению этой этической проблемы, основанных на изучении этически деликатных моментов, пережитых в ходе этнографического исследования конструирования идентичности здоровья и риска. Предлагаются три руководящих принципа: развивайте этическую чувствительность для выявления этически деликатных моментов; при формулировании и постановке вопросов следует учитывать этику, а также методы; более конкретно, брифинги и разборы могут использоваться для решения этических вопросов; и, наконец, заставить участников задуматься над своими мнениями и ответами.

Many sociologists are interested in studying stereotypes and stereotypical reasoning. This interest often stems from a desire to contribute to a more just and equal society. When scientists design and conduct research, they are engaged in conducting effective research in accordance with the research criteria. However, when scientists study stereotypes and stereotypical reasoning, they run the risk of reproducing and possibly even amplifying these processes, and thus harming individuals or groups of people. Scientists are constantly faced with methodological obstacles that have to be overcome in order to promote research in the most effective way. However, sometimes scientists find themselves in situations where conducting effective research may contradict ethical considerations or principles. Research projects that study stereotypes and stereotypical reasoning fall into this category. The debate on this ethical issue mainly takes the form of General discussions on the ethics of the study and weighing the purpose of the study against the potential harm to participants. While these reflections are extremely important, it is necessary to discuss how this ethical issue can be resolved in practice. The purpose of this article is to develop a set of practical recommendations for solving this ethical problem, based on the study of ethically sensitive moments experienced in the course of ethnographic research on the formation of health identity and risk. Three guiding principles are suggested: develop ethical sensitivity to identify ethically sensitive issues; ethics and methods should be taken into account when formulating and posing questions; more specifically, briefings and reviews can be used to address ethical issues; and, finally, to get participants to reflect on their views and responses.

 исследовательская этика этическая чувствительность рефлексивность стереотипы стереотипное мышление исследования с детьми качественные исследования фокус-группы research ethics ethical sensibility reflexivity stereotypes stereotyped reasoning research with children qualitative research focus groups

Alvesson M.; Billing Y.D. Understanding Gender and Organizations; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009. P. 266. Alvesson M.; Billing Y.D. Understanding Gender and Organizations; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009. P. 266. Colucci E. «Focus groups can be fun»: The use of activity-oriented questions in focus group discussions. Qual. Health Res. 2007. 17, P. 1422-1433. Colucci E. «Focus groups can be fun»: The use of activity-oriented questions in focus group discussions. Qual. Health Res. 2007. 17, P. 1422-1433. Eisner E.W.; Peshkin A. Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate; Teachers College, Columbia University: New York, UY, USA, 1990. P. 387. Eisner E.W.; Peshkin A. Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate; Teachers College, Columbia University: New York, UY, USA, 1990. P. 387. Ellis C. Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Re-search With Intimate Others. Qual. Inq. 2007. Vol. 13, P. 3-29. Ellis C. Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Re-search With Intimate Others. Qual. Inq. 2007. Vol. 13, P. 3-29. Fujii L.A. 2012. Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Sci. Politics 5, P. 717-723. Fujii L.A. 2012. Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Sci. Politics 5, P. 717-723. Gilliam L. De Umulige Born Og Det Ordentlige Menneske: Identitet, Ballade Og Muslimske Fillesskaber Blandt Etniske Minoritetsborn; Aarhus Universitetsforlag: Arhus, Denmark, 2009. P. 479. Gilliam L. De Umulige Born Og Det Ordentlige Menneske: Identitet, Ballade Og Muslimske Fillesskaber Blandt Etniske Minoritetsborn; Aarhus Universitetsforlag: Arhus, Denmark, 2009. P. 479. Greenwald A.G.; McGhee D.E.; Schwartz J.L. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1998. Vol. 74, P. 1464-1480. Greenwald A.G.; McGhee D.E.; Schwartz J.L. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1998. Vol. 74, P. 1464-1480. Griffin K.M.; Lahman M.K.E.; Opitz M.F. Shoulder-to-shoulder research with children: Methodological and ethical considerations. J. Early Child. 2016. Res. 14, P. 18-27. Griffin K.M.; Lahman M.K.E.; Opitz M.F. Shoulder-to-shoulder research with children: Methodological and ethical considerations. J. Early Child. 2016. Res. 14, P. 18-27. Guillemin M.; Gillam L. Ethics, reflexivity and «ethically important moments» in research. Qual. Inq. 2004. 10, P. 261-280. Guillemin M.; Gillam L. Ethics, reflexivity and «ethically important moments» in research. Qual. Inq. 2004. 10, P. 261-280. Halkier B. Fokusgrupper 3rd ed.; Samfundslitteratur: Fredeiksberg, Denmark, 2016. P. 126. Halkier B. Fokusgrupper 3rd ed.; Samfundslitteratur: Fredeiksberg, Denmark, 2016. P. 126. Hammersley M.; Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 3rd ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2007. P. 275. Hammersley M.; Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 3rd ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2007. P. 275. Harrits G.S.; Moller M.O. Prevention at the Front Line: How home nurses, pedagogues, and teachers transform public worry into decisions on special efforts. Public Adm. 2014. Rev. 16, P. 447-480. Harrits G.S.; Moller M.O. Prevention at the Front Line: How home nurses, pedagogues, and teachers transform public worry into decisions on special efforts. Public Adm. 2014. Rev. 16, P. 447-480. Hviid Jacobsen M.; Kristiansen S. Farligt Feltarbejde: Etik Og Etnografi i Sociologien; Aalborg Universitetsforlag: Aalborg, Denmark, 2001. P. 141. Hviid Jacobsen M.; Kristiansen S. Farligt Feltarbejde: Etik Og Etnografi i Sociologien; Aalborg Universitetsforlag: Aalborg, Denmark, 2001. P. 141. Lahman M.K.E. Always Othered: Ethical research with children. J. Early Child. 2008. Res. 6, P. 281-300. Lahman M.K.E. Always Othered: Ethical research with children. J. Early Child. 2008. Res. 6, P. 281-300. Mertens D.M.; Ginsberg P.E. Thehandbook of Social Research Ethics; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008. P. 667. Mertens D.M.; Ginsberg P.E. Thehandbook of Social Research Ethics; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008. P. 667. Murphy E.; Dingwall R. The ethics of ethnography. In Handbook of Ethnography; Atkinson, A.C.P., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., Lofland, L., Eds.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008. P. 339-351. Murphy E.; Dingwall R. The ethics of ethnography. In Handbook of Ethnography; Atkinson, A.C.P., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., Lofland, L., Eds.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008. P. 339-351. Pader E. Seing with an Ethnographc Sensibility. In Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research and the Interpretive Turn; Yanow, D., Schwartz-Shea, P., Eds.; M.E. Sharp, Inc.: New York, NY, USA2001. Pader E. Seing with an Ethnographc Sensibility. In Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research and the Interpretive Turn; Yanow, D., Schwartz-Shea, P., Eds.; M.E. Sharp, Inc.: New York, NY, USA2001. Rossman G.B.; Rallis S.F. Everyday ethics: Reflections on practice. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ. 2010. Vol. 23, P. 379-391. Rossman G.B.; Rallis S.F. Everyday ethics: Reflections on practice. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ. 2010. Vol. 23, P. 379-391. Schram S.F.; Soss J.; Fording R.C.; Houser L. Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment at the Frontlines of Welfare Re-form. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2009. Vol. 74, P. 398-422. Schram S.F.; Soss J.; Fording R.C.; Houser L. Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment at the Frontlines of Welfare Re-form. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2009. Vol. 74, P. 398-422. Schwartz-Shea P.; Yanow D. Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. In Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2012. P. 184. Schwartz-Shea P.; Yanow D. Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. In Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2012. P. 184. Skewes L.; Fine C.; Haslam N. Beyond Mars and Venus: The role of gender essentialism in support for gender inequality and backlash. 2018. PLoS ONE 13, e0200921. Skewes L.; Fine C.; Haslam N. Beyond Mars and Venus: The role of gender essentialism in support for gender inequality and backlash. 2018. PLoS ONE 13, e0200921. Tajfel H. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1982. P. 528. Tajfel H. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1982. P. 528. Wang C.C. Youth Participation in Photovoice as a Strategy for Community Change. J. Community Pract. 2006. Vol. 14, P. 147-161. Wang C.C. Youth Participation in Photovoice as a Strategy for Community Change. J. Community Pract. 2006. Vol. 14, P. 147-161. Watts J.H. Ethical and practical challenges of participant oservation in sensitive health research. Int. Journal Soc. Res. Methodol. 2011. Vol. 14, P. 301-312. Watts J.H. Ethical and practical challenges of participant oservation in sensitive health research. Int. Journal Soc. Res. Methodol. 2011. Vol. 14, P. 301-312. Ybema S. Organizational Ethnography: Studying the Comlexities of Everyday Life; SAGE: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2009. P. 288. Ybema S. Organizational Ethnography: Studying the Comlexities of Everyday Life; SAGE: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2009. P. 288.