<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20190208//EN"
       "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Journal of Political Research</journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title xml:lang="en">Journal of Political Research</journal-title>
    <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
     <trans-title>Журнал политических исследований</trans-title>
    </trans-title-group>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn publication-format="online">2587-6295</issn>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">64055</article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12737/2587-6295-2023-7-1-65-75</article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru">
     <subject>Тема номера</subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en">
     <subject>number subject</subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group>
     <subject>Тема номера</subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">The concept of culture war and its potential  for the analysis of political and worldview conflicts</article-title>
    <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
     <trans-title>Концепция культурной войны и ее потенциал  для анализа политико-мировоззренческих конфликтов</trans-title>
    </trans-title-group>
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group content-type="authors">
    <contrib contrib-type="author">
     <name-alternatives>
      <name xml:lang="ru">
       <surname>Полулях</surname>
       <given-names>Д. С.</given-names>
      </name>
      <name xml:lang="en">
       <surname>Polulyah</surname>
       <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
      </name>
     </name-alternatives>
     <email>daniilpolulyakh@mail.ru</email>
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group>
   <aff-alternatives id="aff-1">
    <aff>
     <institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный университет имени М.В.Ломоносова</institution>
    </aff>
    <aff>
     <institution xml:lang="en">Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution>
    </aff>
   </aff-alternatives>
   <pub-date publication-format="print" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-05-04T18:01:21+03:00">
    <day>04</day>
    <month>05</month>
    <year>2023</year>
   </pub-date>
   <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-05-04T18:01:21+03:00">
    <day>04</day>
    <month>05</month>
    <year>2023</year>
   </pub-date>
   <volume>7</volume>
   <issue>1</issue>
   <fpage>65</fpage>
   <lpage>75</lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-02-09T00:00:00+03:00">
     <day>09</day>
     <month>02</month>
     <year>2023</year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2023-03-11T00:00:00+03:00">
     <day>11</day>
     <month>03</month>
     <year>2023</year>
    </date>
   </history>
   <self-uri xlink:href="https://zh-szf.ru/en/nauka/article/64055/view">https://zh-szf.ru/en/nauka/article/64055/view</self-uri>
   <abstract xml:lang="ru">
    <p>Целью данной статьи является выявление потенциала концепции культурной войны для анализа политико-мировоззренческих конфликтов в американском и других современных обществах. На основе методов кейс-стади, анализа литературы и статистики в статье приводятся основные положения концепции и осуществляется разбор ключевых академических дискуссий об особенностях применения данной теоретической перспективы к американской общественно-политической жизни. Автор выделяет два подхода к анализу культурных войн – эмпирический и системный (биполярный). Приводится классификация «горячих точек» культурных войн в современных, прежде всего западных, обществах. Выдвигается тезис, что хоть и невозможно все моральные противостояния свести к конфликту «ортодоксов» и «прогрессивистов», биполярный подход часто оказывается полезным для понимания наиболее значимых культурных войн. Автор приходит к выводу, что тезис о культурных войнах, ведущихся в Соединенных Штатах, не только выдерживает критику, выдвинутую скептиками, но также становится все более актуален на фоне противоречивых тенденций современного мира. Этот вывод согласуется с теоретическими и эмпирическими исследованиями политической психологии и социологии, указывающих на глубинный характер мнений граждан по моральным проблемам и вопросам идентичности. Концепция культурной войны как теоретическая перспектива, указывающая на фундаментальный характер различий мнений по морально-этическим вопросам, может пролить свет также на процессы, происходящие в других странах, включая Россию.</p>
   </abstract>
   <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
    <p>The purpose of this article is to identify the potential of the cultural war concept for the analysis of political and worldview conflicts in American and other modern societies. Based on the methods of case study, literature and statistics analysis, the article provides the main provisions of the concept and analyzes key academic discussions about the features of the application of this theoretical perspective to American social and political life. The author identifies two approaches to the analysis of cultural wars – empirical and systemic (bipolar). The classification of the “hot buttons” of cultural wars in modern, primarily Western, societies is given. The thesis is put forward that although it is impossible to reduce all moral confrontations to the conflict of “orthodox” and “progressivists”, the bipolar approach often turns out to be useful for understanding the most significant culture wars. The author comes to the conclusion that the thesis about culture wars being waged in the United States not only withstands the criticism put forward by skeptics, but also becomes more and more relevant against the backdrop of the contradictory trends of the modern world. This conclusion is consistent with theoretical and empirical studies of political psychology and sociology, pointing to the deep nature of citizens' opinions on moral and identity issues. The concept of culture war as a theoretical perspective that points to the fundamental nature of differences of opinion on moral and ethical issues can also shed light on processes taking place in other countries, including Russia.</p>
   </trans-abstract>
   <kwd-group xml:lang="ru">
    <kwd>культурная война</kwd>
    <kwd>политическая культура</kwd>
    <kwd>политическая поляризация</kwd>
    <kwd>идеология</kwd>
    <kwd>мировоззрение</kwd>
    <kwd>политика США</kwd>
   </kwd-group>
   <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
    <kwd>culture war</kwd>
    <kwd>political culture</kwd>
    <kwd>political polarization</kwd>
    <kwd>ideology</kwd>
    <kwd>worldviews</kwd>
    <kwd>US politics</kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <p></p>
 </body>
 <back>
  <ref-list>
   <ref id="B1">
    <label>1.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Казаринова Д.Б. Эволюция понятия «культурная война» в западной политической мысли / Мозаичное поле мировой и российской публичной политики. Политическая наука: Ежегодник 2020-2021 / Российская Ассоциация политической науки; [под ред. О. В. Гаман-Голутвиной, А. И. Соловьева, А. И. Щербинина]. - М., Томск: Издательство Томского государственного университета. 2021. 438 с.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kazarinova D.B. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «kul'turnaya voyna» v zapadnoy politicheskoy mysli [The evolution of the concept of &quot;culture war&quot; in Western political thought]. Mozaichnoe pole mirovoy i rossiyskoy publichnoy politiki. Politicheskaya nauka: Ezhegodnik 2020-2021 [Mosaic field of world and Russian public policy. Political Science: Yearbook 2020-2021]. Moscow; Tomsk, Izdatel'stvo Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Publ., 2021, 438 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B2">
    <label>2.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Липсет С.М., Роккан C. Структуры размежеваний, партийные системы и предпочтения избирателей / Партии и выборы: Хрестоматия / РАН.ИНИОН. Центр социальных научно-информационных исследований. Отдел политической науки. Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД РФ; Отв. ред. и сост. Н.В. Анохина, Е.Ю. Мелешкина. - Ч.1. - М.: ИНИОН. 2004. 150 с.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lipset S.M., Rokkan C. Struktury razmezhevaniy, partiynye sistemy i predpochteniya izbirateley [Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments]. Partii i vybory: Khrestomatiya [Parties and Elections: Reader]. V. 1, M., INION Publ., 2004, 150 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B3">
    <label>3.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полулях Д.С. Россиянин в контексте культурных войн будущего / Россия 2030 глазами молодых ученых / Материалы IV Всероссийской научной конференции (Москва, сентябрь-ноябрь 2012 г). Сборник. - М.: Научный эксперт. 2013. 458 с.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polulyakh D.S. Rossiyanin v kontekste kul'turnykh voyn budushchego [The Russian citizen in the context of the culture wars of the future]. Rossiya 2030 glazami molodykh uchenykh / Materialy IV Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii (Moskva, sentyabr'-noyabr' 2012 g). Sbornik [Russia 2030 through the eyes of young scientists / Proceedings of the IV All-Russian Scientific Conference (Moscow, September-November 2012). Collection]. M., Nauchnyy ekspert Publ., 2013, 458 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B4">
    <label>4.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ansolabehere S., Rodden J., Snyder J.M. Purple America // Journal of Economic Perspectives. - 2006. - №2(20). - P. 97-118.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ansolabehere S., Rodden J., Snyder J.M. Purple America, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2006, V. 20, I. 2, pp. 97-118.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B5">
    <label>5.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fiorina M.P., Abrams S.J., Pope J. Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America. - New York: Pearson Longman. 2005. 116 p.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fiorina M.P., Abrams S.J., Pope J. Culture War? : The Myth of a Polarized America, New York, Pearson Longman Publ., 2005, 116 p.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B6">
    <label>6.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goren P., Chapp C. Moral Power: How Public Opinion on Culture War Issues Shapes Partisan Predispositions and Religious Orientations // American Political Science Review. - 2017. - №1(111). - P. 110-128.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goren P., Chapp C. Moral Power: How Public Opinion on Culture War Issues Shapes Partisan Predispositions and Religious Orientations, American Political Science Review, 2017, V. 111, I. 1, pp. 110-128.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B7">
    <label>7.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hetherington M., Weiler J. Prius or Pickup? How the Answers to Four Simple Questions Explain America’s Great Divide. - Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 2018. 289 p.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hetherington M., Weiler J. Prius or Pickup? How the Answers to Four Simple Questions Explain America’s Great Divide, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publ., 2018, 289 p.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B8">
    <label>8.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hunter J.D. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. - New York: Basic Books. 1991. 416 p.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hunter J.D. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America, New York, Basic Books Publ., 1991, 416 p.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B9">
    <label>9.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hunter J.D., Wolfe A., Dionne E.J., Cromartie M. Is There a Culture War?: A Dialogue on Values and American Public Life. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. 2006. 118 p.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hunter J.D., Wolfe A., Dionne E.J., Cromartie M. Is There a Culture War?: A Dialogue on Values and American Public Life. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press Publ., 2006. 118 p.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B10">
    <label>10.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Klein E. Why We're Polarized. - New York: Avid Reader Press. 2020. 336 p.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Klein E. Why We're Polarized, New York, Avid Reader Press Publ., 2020, 336 p.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B11">
    <label>11.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mason L. ‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization // American Journal of Political Science. - 2015. - №1(59). P. 128-145</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mason L. ‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization, American Journal of Political Science, 2015, V. 59, I. 1, pp. 128-145</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B12">
    <label>12.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McCarty N. Polarization: What Everyone Needs to Know. - New York: Oxford University Press. 2019. 258 p.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McCarty N. Polarization: What Everyone Needs to Know, New York, Oxford University Press Publ., 2019, 258 p.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B13">
    <label>13.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Melzer S. Gun Crusaders: The NRA’s Culture War. New York: New York University Press. 2009. 323 p.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Melzer S. Gun Crusaders: The NRA’s Culture War, New York: New York University Press Publ., 2009, 323 p.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B14">
    <label>14.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wolfe A. One Nation, After All: What Middle Class Americans Really Think about God, Country, Family, Racism, Welfare, Immigration, Homosexuality, Work, the Right, the Left, and Each Other. - New York: Viking Penguin. 1998. 359 p.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wolfe A. One Nation, After All: What Middle Class Americans Really Think about God, Country, Family, Racism, Welfare, Immigration, Homosexuality, Work, the Right, the Left, and Each Other, New York, Viking Penguin Publ., 1998, 359 p.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>
