employee from 01.01.2016 until now
Moscow, Russian Federation
UDC 657.6
CSCSTI 06.73
Russian Classification of Professions by Education 38.02.06
Russian Library and Bibliographic Classification 65
Russian Trade and Bibliographic Classification 776
BISAC BUS064020 International / Taxation
BISAC BUS064000 Taxation / General
BISAC BUS064010 Taxation / Corporate
The subject of the article is the principles of taxation and tax regulation of the provision of the ecosystem of technological development. The work considers the architecture of the ecosystem of technological development, provides its constituent elements of the relationship and functions of the constituent elements of the ecosystem. The main subjects (technology companies) and peripheral (other organizations, government, financial institutions, as well as academic and research organizations) are identified as elements of the ecosystem. The author's classification of types of tax support for ecosystems of technological development is given: functional, sectoral, territorial, cluster, zonal, subject-sectoral, point. The author characterized the interaction of fiscal and monetary policies, on the basis of which a conclusion was made about the advantage of fiscal policy (fiscal leadership regime) over monetary policy (monetary leadership regime). The study uses general scientific methods: abstraction, analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction. Among the specific scientific methods, tabular and graphical methods of data visualization are used. The main scientific conclusion is that the system-forming principles of tax regulation of technological sovereignty are consistency and complexity. The principle of systematic taxation assumes that the interaction between the elements of the ecosystem of technological development is no less important than these elements themselves. The principle of complexity is responsible for the level of complexity and diversity of the system of tax regulation of technological sovereignty and tax instruments. The systematic nature of tax regulation is manifested in several aspects: 1) the multiplicative (emergent) nature of the influence of tax instruments; 2) the presence of distorting effects of tax regulation of technological ecosystems; 3) taking into account the relationship between tax and other economic regulators of ensuring technological sovereignty. The principle of complexity assumes that tax incentives for ecosystems of technological development should include functional, sectoral and territorial aspects.
technological sovereignty, systematics of taxation, complexity of taxation, tax incentives, innovations, effects of taxation, technological leadership, principles of taxation, tax regulation, tax benefits
1. Huang L., Mi L., Wu F. An analysis of the current situation and trend of the industrial innovation ecosystem abroad // International journal of scientific research and management. 2019. Vol. 40 (5). Pp. 1-12.
2. Cheng Q., Zhao Y., Wu Y. The impact of value Co-creation model of open innovation ecosystem on value Co-creation effect: based on the model of cross level regulation effect // Science & Technology Progress and Policy. 2021. Vol. 38 (17). Pp. 87-96.
3. Xin C., Li M., Wu Y. Firms' Knowledge base and value Co-creation in innovation ecosystem // R&D management. 2022. Vol. 34 (2). Pp. 79-90.
4. Adner R. Ecosystem as structure: an actionable construct for strategy // Journal of Management. 2017. Vol. 43 (1). Pp. 39-58. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451.
5. Siluanov A. Rol' byudzhetnoi politiki v obespechenii finansovogo i tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta strany // Ekonomicheskaya politika. 2024. T. 19, № 5. S. 6-29. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.18288/1994–5124-2024-5-6-29. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KFTYBN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2024-5-6-29
6. Kapkanshchikova S.V., Kapkanshchikov S.G. Perspektivy perekhoda ot diskretsionnoi fiskal'noi politiki v sovremennoi Rossii k politike avtomaticheskoi // Simbirskii nauchnyi vestnik. 2015. № 4 (22). S. 101-110. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VUCRCH.
7. Adam K., Billi R.M. Distortionary fiscal policy and monetary policy goals // Economics Letters. 2024. Vol. 122. Is. 1. Pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.10.017.
8. Bogachev S.V., Vishnevskii V.P. Nalogovoe stimulirovanie ekonomicheskogo rosta v Rossii: analiz s pozitsii nalogovoi dinamichnosti // Terra Economicus. 2024. T. 22. № 2. S. 22-38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18522/2073–6606-2024-22-2-22-38. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QOHMSZ. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2024-22-2-22-38
9. Marattin L., Marzo M., Zagaglia P. Distortionary tax instruments and implementable monetary policy // International Review of Economics & Finance. 2013. Vol. 25. Pp. 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2012.07.006.
10. Frumina S.V. Dostizhenie tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta: rol' tselepolaganiya i instrumentov byudzhetno-nalogovoi politiki // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoi praktiki. 2025. T. 21, № 2. S. 288-293. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.33693/2541–8025-2025-21-2-288-293. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RPQYXB. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2541-8025-2025-21-2-288-293
11. Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means // Research Policy. 2023. Vol. 52. Is. 6. 104765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JFINLC.
12. Okun'kova E.A., Ozerov S.L., Kolesnikov A.V., Zakharov E.V. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie funktsii ekosistem i ikh rol' v ekonomicheskom razvitii // Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya. 2021. T. 3, № 10(118). S. 120-127. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2021.10.03.013. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DFSXMG.
13. Goncharenko L.I. Konstruktiv preferentsial'nykh nalogovykh rezhimov kak determinanta privlecheniya investitsii v innovatsionnoe razvitie Rossii // Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. 2024. T. 17, № 3. S. 156-166. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2024-17-3-156-166. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QQYEJM.
14. Gereev R.A. Osobennosti nalogovogo stimulirovaniya promyshlennogo proizvodstva // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. 2018. № 3. S. 1-10. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YWFOXG.
15. Mel'nikova N.P. Kontseptual'naya model' formirovaniya innovatsionnogo klastera // Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2020. T. 10. № 1-1. S. 38-44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2020.91.1.004. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BZGGBZ.
16. Ibragimova D.R. Osobennosti nalogovogo stimulirovaniya promyshlennykh i innovatsionnykh klasterov v Rossii // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. 2021. № 1. S. 35-49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-065X.2021.1.34899 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ETZKOG
17. Sinenko O.A. Modeling the Policy of Tax Incentives for Sustainable Development of the Region: The Case of the Far Eastern Federal District of Russia // Journal of Tax Reform. 2024. Vol. 10, No. 2. P. 312-333. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2024.10.2.171. EDN ATITXK.
18. Lapin V.N. Razvitie nalogovykh preferentsii dlya stimulirovaniya fundamental'nykh otraslei ekonomiki // Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2005. № 10. S. 76-81. EDN KZCZMZ.
19. Sekushin A.Yu. Tochechnye i kompleksnye nalogovye stimuly podderzhki farmatsevticheskoi promyshlennosti // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. 2025. № 3. S. 66-78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-065X.2025.3.74740 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XQJPOI
20. Sekushin A.Yu. Kompleksnoe stimulirovanie farmatsevticheskoi otrasli kak faktor obespecheniya lekarstvennoi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2024. № 3. S. 40-61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0668.2024.3.70705 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IHFAXQ
