Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov (Department of Socio-Cultural Design and Development of Territories, professor)
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
Odintsovo, Russian Federation
UDC 378
The relevance of the presented research is determined by the fact that in the development of an organization in accordance with the basic laws of dialectics there is always a dilemma between changes and stability of activity. At the same time, on the one hand, it is absolutely natural that in the activity of an organization, the period of implementation of the suggested changes is replaced by a period of stability associated with the use of the results of these improving changes. On the other hand, if the stage of stability in the activity of an organization passes into the phase of bureaucratic inhibition of development, then this is a very dangerous situation. In this regard, the consideration of a learning organization as the antipode of a bureaucratic organization from the point of view of development prospects during the ongoing change of technological structures seems to be a significant issue. The purpose of the presented research is to determine the fundamental differences between a learning organization and a bureaucratic one in the interests of determining rational areas of their use in various development conditions. The scientific novelty of the obtained results lies in the analysis of the features of the implementation of the postulates of a learning organization in a modern organization (concerning key competencies, strategic intentions, strategic views as a source of tensions and the strategy itself as a system of levers) and the proportions of their application in combination with the postulates of the functioning of a bureaucratic organization. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in the possibility of using the proposed balanced approach to the formation of a development strategy, taking into account the strengths and weaknesses of both a learning and a bureaucratic organization.
learning organization, bureaucratic organization, antithesis
1. Boisot, M. H., ed. Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture (London: Routledge, 1995).
2. Braybrooke, D., and Lindblom, C. E. A Strategy of Decision (New York: Free Press, 1963).
3. Burgelman, R. A. «A Process Model of Strategic Business Exit: Implications for an Evolu tionary Perspective on Strategy». Strategic Management Journal (17, 1996: 193–214). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171012
4. Fayol, Henri. Administration industrielle et Générale — Paris. — Dunod et Pinat. 1916 — 174 p.
5. Hamel, G., and Prahalad, C. K. «Strategic Intent». Harvard Business Review (May–June 1989: 63–76).
6. Hamel, G., and Prahalad, C. K. «Strategy as Stretch and Leverage» Harvard Business Review (71, 2, March–April 1993: 75–84).
7. Itami, H., with T. W. Roehl. Mobilizing Invisible Assets (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038981
8. McKinsey Matrix/GE Business Screen. https://www.12manage.com/methods_ge_mckinsey.html
9. Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Boston: Har vard University Press, 1982).
10. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (New York; Oxford University Press, 1995). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001
11. Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, G. «The Core Competence of the Corporation» Harvard Business Review (68, 3, May–June 1990: 79–91).
12. Quinn, J. B. «Strategic Change: ‘Logical Incrementalism.’» Sloan Management Review (Fall 1978: 7–21).
13. Robert M. Randall «Sniping at Strategic Planning». Planning Review (May 1984: 8–11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054057
14. Shava E. and Muringa T.P. (2024) Curbing bureaucratic limitations through continuous learning in local government in South Africa. Front. Polit. Sci. 6:1435414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1435414; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FGREBM
15. Shcherbina V. V., Popova E. P. (2019), “University as a specific type of organization, its functions and relationships with the external environment”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 5(4), 184-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-4-0-16; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MKBIHO
16. Shewhart, Walter Andrew. A study of the accelerated motion of small drops through a viscous medium. — Press of the New Era Printing Company, 1917. — P. 433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.9.425
17. Tampoe, M. «Exploiting the Core Competence of Your Organization. » Long-Range Planning (27, 4, 1994: 60–77). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(94)90057-4
18. Adizes, I. Upravlenie zhiznennym ciklom korporaciy / Ichak Kalderon Adizes; per. s angl. V. Kuzina. — M.: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2014. — 512 s.
19. Vitashov D.S. Preodolenie byurokraticheskih tendenciy v krupnyh gosudarstvennyh organizaciyah. Monografiya. M.: Izd-vo «Sputnik+», 2015. 164 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UJNWMD
20. Dement'eva A.G. Obuchayuschayasya organizaciya v sovremennoy sisteme razvitiya personala kompanii. // Voprosy ekonomiki i prava. 2018. № 119. S. 115-119. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YABACT
21. Il'in, G.L. (2012). Razmyshleniya o byurokratizacii i korrupcii v otechestvennom obrazovanii. Vestnik prakticheskoy psihologii obrazovaniya, 9(1), 20–26. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FBBPGY
22. Klyucharev G.A. Ob "obuchayuschihsya organizaciyah" i korporativnom obrazovanii v innovacionnom kontekste. // Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. 2014. № 6 (36). S. 121-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc/2014.6.36.10; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TEOOSF
23. Levin K. Dinamicheskaya psihologiya: Izbrannye trudy / Pod obsch. red. D. A. Leont'eva i E. Yu. Patyaevoy; [sost., per. s nem. i angl. yaz. i nauch. red. D. A. Leont'eva, E. Yu. Patyaevoy]. — M.: Smysl, 2001. – 572 s.
24. Makarin A.V. Rossiyskaya byurokratiya: problemy i perspektivy. - Sankt-Peterburg: Fond razvitiya konfliktologii, 2017. – 374 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZWJZJT
25. Mincberg G. Strategicheskoe safari: Ekskursiya po debryam strategicheskogo menedzhmenta / Genri Mincberg, Bryus Al'strand, Zhozef Lampel'; Per. s angl. — M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2013. — 367 s.
26. Mityukova E.V. Social'noe proektirovanie obuchayuscheysya organizacii v usloviyah sovremennoy Rossii: avtoreferat dis. kandidata sociologicheskih nauk: 22.00.08 / Mityukova Elena Viktorovna. - Saratov, 2007. - 23 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NIYNVP
27. Osipov A.M. Prioritety izucheniya obrazovaniya v svete problemy byuropatologiy. // Vestnik Instituta sociologii. 2023. Tom 14. № 2. S. 15–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2023.14.2.2; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UOVTMS
28. Suhanova G.N., Titov V.N. Chelovecheskiy faktor v byurokraticheskoy organizacii: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya. // Upravlenie personalom i intellektual'nymi resursami v Rossii. 2016. T. 5. № 6. S. 5-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/24099; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YSFAPQ
29. Tebekin A. V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N. V., Horeva A. V. (2022). Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya NIO.2 v ramkah shestogo tehnologicheskogo uklada // Noonomika i nooobschestvo: Al'manah trudov INIR im. S. Yu. Vitte. T. 1, № 2. S. 57–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37930/2782-618X-2022-1-2-57-75; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QAGMQQ
30. Tebekin A.V. Izmenenie soderzhaniya truda, haraktera trudovyh otnosheniy, sistemy cennostey organizacii i motivov trudovoy deyatel'nosti pri perehode ekonomiki k novomu tehnologicheskomu ukladu. // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2022. № 1. S. 70-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52375/20728689_2022_1_70; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CUIQCR
31. Tebekin A.V. Ispol'zovanie bazovyh polozheniy shkoly obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma v interesah razvitiya sistemy obrazovaniya s uchetom vyzovov HHI veka. // Zhurnal pedagogicheskih issledovaniy. 2024. T. 9. № 1. S. 30-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2500-3305-2024-9-1-30-43; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NZHYQE
32. Tebekin A.V. Ispol'zovanie postulatov shkoly obucheniya strategicheskogo menedzhmenta v interesah razvitiya personala organizacii s uchetom vyzovov HHI veka. // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. 2024. № 2 (110). S. 66-79. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VJDJPC
33. Tebekin A.V. Ispol'zovanie strategii obucheniya v razvitii professional'noy organizacii: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy aspekt. // Professional'noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire. 2023. T. 13. № 4. S. 623-636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2023-4-4; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NIBYDV
34. Tebekin A.V. Kriteriy kolichestvennoy ocenki perspektiv strategicheskogo razvitiya, formiruemogo na osnove modeli vnutrennih korporativnyh iniciativ. // Zhurnal issledovaniy po upravleniyu. 2023. T. 9. № 6. S. 3-17. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PEYYSL
35. Tebekin A.V. Paradigma orientacii na razrabotku effektivnyh strategiy vzamen strategiy s effektnymi formulirovkami v shkole obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma. // Zhurnal filosofskih issledovaniy. 2023. T. 9. № 2. S. 42-54. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FKGZJQ
36. Tebekin A.V. Perehod ot formulirovaniya strategii k ee formirovaniyu kak put' obespecheniya effektivnosti razvitiya v shkole obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma. // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2023. № 6. S. 146-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52375/20728689_2023_6_146; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ATQGQY
37. Tebekin A.V. Postulaty shkoly obucheniya strategicheskogo menedzhmenta Charl'za Lindbloma: filosofskiy aspekt. // Zhurnal filosofskih issledovaniy. 2023. T. 9. № 3. S. 45-58. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IEVXYF
38. Tebekin A.V. Rol' razvivayuscheysya strategii shkoly obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma v povysheniya effektivnosti funkcionirovaniya organizacii v sovremennyh usloviyah. // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2024. № 3. S. 93-100. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QVMVLJ
39. Tebekin A.V. Filosofiya inkrementalizma kak klyuch k ponimaniyu processov formirovaniya strategiy razvitiya v shkole obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma. // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. 2023. № 8 (104). S. 12-24. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CGZPRW
40. Tebekin A.V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N.V., Horeva A.V. Logicheskiy inkrementalizm kak bazovaya osnova formirovaniya strategiy razvitiya v nauchnoy shkole obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma. // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2023. № 4. S. 81-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52375/20728689_2023_4_81; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CGIFYP
41. Tebekin A.V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N.V., Horeva A.V. Filosofiya shkoly obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma: effektivnost' na smenu effektnosti. // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2023. № 3. S. 43-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52375/20728689_2023_3_43; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RACQIS
42. Tebekin A.V., Tebekin P.A. Vliyanie shkol strategicheskogo menedzhmenta i marketinga na sovremennoe razvitie podhodov k upravleniyu. // Vestnik Moskovskogo finansovo-yuridicheskogo universiteta MFYuA. 2019. № 3. S. 14-23. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CCJHBT
43. Tebekin A.V. Upravlenie razvitiem organizacii skvoz' prizmu evolyucionnoy teorii R. Nel'sona i S. Uintera. Nauka i iskusstvo upravleniya. 2024;(2):36-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28995/2782-2222-2024-2-36-54; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KICXZP
44. Tebekin, A.V. Prichiny ignorirovaniya strategicheskih iniciativ v sovremennyh koncepciyah strategicheskogo razvitiya makroekonomicheskih sistem: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy aspekt/A.V. Tebekin. - Tekst: elektronnyy // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. - 2023 - №10. - S.92-105. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CQOJBI
