Russian Federation
Kursk, Russian Federation
The rapid development of genetics stimulates the study of many philosophical, ideological and methodological issues related to this science. Philosophy of science as a section of philosophical knowledge is increasingly entering into a dialogue with genetics, these branches of science have an increasing mutual influence on each other. Scientific novelty in the philosophy of science is expressed in the ability of the researcher to analyze the achievements of modern science in the aspects of their ideological, methodological and socio-cultural significance. It is impossible not to notice the influence of genetic research on the relationship between the biological and socio-cultural spheres in the study of consciousness, behavior, and human psychology. The results of genetic research and the use of the data obtained, primarily for medical purposes, pose new ideological and methodological challenges for philosophy as a science. Diagnostics and the possibility of treating hereditary diseases create new questions about the worldview and morality, which philosophy, as a unifying science, must answer.
anthropogenetics, problems of philosophy, genetic research
1. Azarova Yu.E. Svyaz' odnonukleotidnogo polimorfizma rs4880 gena SOD2 s razvitiem mikrososudistyh oslozhneniy saharnogo diabeta 2-go tipa / Yu.E. Azarova. ‒ Nauchnye rezul'taty biomedicinskih issledovaniy. ‒ 2023. ‒ № 9(4). ‒ 461-473.
2. Aseeva I.A., Volohova N.V., Grebenschikova E.G. «Russkaya tradiciya» v bioetike: etiko-aksiologicheskie osnovaniya / I.A. Aseeva, N.V. Volohova, E.G. Grebenschikova – Kursk, 2017. – 196 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YNYPIA
3. Kiselev L.L. Genom cheloveka i biologiya XXI veka / L.L. Kiselev. ‒ Vestnik RAN. ‒ 2000. ‒ T. 70, № 5. ‒ 413 s.
4. Knyazev V.N. Razvitie genetiki i filosofsko-eticheskoe ponimanie cheloveka / V.N. Knyazev, V.V. Fedorin. ‒ Filosofiya i kul'tura. ‒ 2016. ‒ №2(98). ‒ S. 206-213.
5. Naydysh V.M. Filosofskie problemy antropogenetiki i gennoy inzhenerii / V.M. Naydysh, E.N. Gnatik. ‒ Vestnik RUDN, seriya Filosofiya, 2008. ‒ № 4. ‒ S 29-35.
6. Plohinova M.B. K voprosu o filosofsko-gumanitarnyh problemah genetiki cheloveka / M.B. Plohinova. ‒ Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. ‒ 2009. ‒ S. 1-4.
7. Tarantul V.Z. Genom cheloveka: Enciklopediya, napisannaya chetyr'mya bukvami / V.Z. Tarantul ‒ M., 2003. ‒ 277s.
8. Bedessem B. Two conceptions of the sources of conservatism in scientific research / B. Bedessem. ‒ Synthese. ‒ 2021. ‒ №198. ‒ P. 6597–6614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02479-0
9. Chang, C. Genetic contribution to concern for nature and proenvironmental behavior / C. Chang [and ect.]. ‒ 2021. ‒ BioScience. biab103.https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab103.
10. Cherepkova E.V. Genotype and haplotype frequencies of the DRD4 VNTR polymorphism in the men with no history of ADHD, convicted of violent crimes / E.V. Cherepkova, V.N. Maksimov, L.I. Aftanasa, P.N. Menshanov. ‒ Journal of Criminal Justice. ‒ 2015. ‒ № 43. ‒ P. 464-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.10.002
11. Keuck L. Introduction: Embracing ambivalence and change. / L. Keuck, K. Nickelsen. ‒ Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte. ‒ 2022. ‒ №45. ‒ P.291–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bewi.202200044
12. Meunier R. History, philosophy, and science education: reflections on genetics 20 years after the human genome project / R. Meunier. ‒ Hist Philos Life Sci. ‒ 2023. ‒№ 45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-023-00569-4. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WZRPAR
