Russian Federation
Classical gravitational interaction alone is insufficient to explain the nearly constant orbital velocities of stars at the outskirts of galaxies. Therefore, various transcendental hypotheses have been developed: the existence of invisible dark matter, various modifications of Newton's laws, and others. This paper demonstrates that classical gravitational interaction (F = γMm*R-2) allows for orbital motion at any distance from the massive center, even to infinity. However, additional interaction (F = δMm*R-1) allows for orbital motion only at a limited distance from the center. This interaction can explain the finite size of galaxies. Furthermore, this additional interaction ensures the constant orbital velocities of stars, as observed at the outskirts of galaxies. The paper demonstrates that the synergy and complementarity of classical gravity and additional interactions allows us to describe the motion of matter from ordinary to galactic distances. This approach has not only a specific astrophysical explanation but also profound philosophical significance for understanding the foundations of the universe.
gravitation, additional potential, transcendental models, thermodynamic analysis of orbital motion
1. Lebedev S.A. Nauchnye teorii i ih istinnost'. Zhurnal filosofskih issledovaniy. 2025. T 11. №1. S. 3-14. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QUHXOU
2. Lebedev S.A. Nauchnoe znanie i ego struktura. Zhurnal filosofskih issledovaniy. 2025. T 11. №2. S. 9-27. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XEOZEW
3. RubinV., FordW. Rotation of the Andromeda nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emission regions. Astrophys. J. 1970. 159:379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/150317
4. Milgrom M. A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. Astrophys. J. 1983. 270: 365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/161130
5. Bekenstein J. Relativistic gravitation theory for the modified Newtonian dynamics paradigm. Phys. Rev. D. 2004. 70, 083509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083509
6. Tohline J. Proceedings of the Symposium, Besancon, France, 1982. A83-49201, 24-89.
7. Sanders R. Astronomy and Astrophysics 1984. 136. L21-L23. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/ 1984A%26A…136L..21S.
8. Puga V.A. Mnogomernoe gravitacionnoe vzaimodeystvie. Krivye vrascheniya galaktik. ZhETF. 2014 146. 500. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7868/S0044451014090090.
9. Rimskiy-Korsakov A.A., Trudy radievogo instituta im. Hlopina. Sankt-Peterburg 200310 65-69.
10. Stabnikov P., Babailov S.A Change of the Gravitational Interaction on the Galactic Distances. Astrobiol Outreach, 20153. 4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-2519.1000137.
11. Stabnikov P.A., Babailov S.P. An Addition to the Classic Gravity Interstellar Interactions J. Astrophys. Aerospace Technol. 2017. 5. 1-4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6542.1000138.
12. Stabnikov P.A., Babailov S.P. Global Systematization of Material Objects and the Number of Fundamental Interactions. Intern. J. Astronaut Aeronautical Eng. 2021. 6:050. DOI:https://doi.org/10.35840/2631-5009/7550. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KIQQNC
13. Babailov S.P., Stabnikov P.A. Approaches to Describing the Motion of Stars in Galaxies. Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology. Short Communication 2023. Volume 11. Issue 4.
