Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
The paper attempts to evaluate the efficiency of higher education system management based on measurable quantitative criteria of the performance of employees with higher education. For this purpose, the dynamics of the premium for higher education of employed specialists of higher and middle qualification levels in Russia in the 21 st century was studied. The results of the study showed a drop in the premium for employed specialists of the highest qualification level. Moreover, a drop to a level two times lower than the premium for higher education of specialists of the middle qualification level is observed. At the same time, the increase in the number of employed workers with higher education did not have a significant impact on the premium for higher education of employed specialists of the highest qualification level. The results of the study suggest that most universities essentially perform the functions of secondary vocational education institutions. The results of the research suggest that the reforms of higher education carried out in the post-Soviet period entailed a drop in the level and quality, in fact, the degradation of higher education. It can be assumed that the educational reforms carried out in the post-Soviet period contributed to the decline in the level and quality of education due to the collapse of the terms of study, the transition to the uncertainty of the content of education, conditioned by the competence approach, shortcomings of fundamental training with an unjustified focus on practical training. The problems of the decline in the level and quality of education can obviously be caused by the outdated and ineffective command-and-control management system, rooted in Taylorism, the lack of understanding of the essence of the category «education», the lack of practice of scientifically based quality management.
level of education, human capital, premium for education, content of education, philosophy of management, quality
1. Bersirov T.B. Operacionalizaciya ponyatiya effektivnosti gosudarstvennogo upravleniya vysshim obrazovaniem // Vestnik Yuzhno-Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta (NPI). Seriya: Social'no-ekonomicheskie nauki. 2021. T. 14. № 5. S. 21-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17213/2075-2067-2021-5-21-26; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WAETVL
2. Osipov A.M., Naran B. Kakova obschestvennaya effektivnost' obrazovaniya v Rossii? // Vestnik rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: sociologiya. Tom: 23. №4. 2023 S. 888-900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2023-23-4-888-900
3. Dyatlov A. V., Kovalev V. V. Effektivnost' upravleniya vysshim obrazovaniem Rossii v praktikah primeneniya menedzheristskih instrumentov // Vestnik Instituta sociologii. 2023.Tom 14. № 2. S. 70–91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2023.14.2.3; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RGIKSM
4. Leontief W. Essays in Economics: Theories, Theorizing, Facts, and Policies Paperback. Transaction Publishers, 1985. 423 p.
5. Schultz T. Capital formation by education // Journal of Political Economy. 1960, 68 (6), pp. 571–583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/258393
6. Schultz T. W. Investment in human capital // American Economic Review. 1961. Vol.51. No.1. pp. 1–17.
7. Gillis D. Public education as a high-yield investment: the theory of human capital in the discourse of European politics // Pedagogical Journal. 2011, 2 (2), pp. 224-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10159-011-0011-3
8. Gillis D. Human Capital Theory in Education. In: Peters M. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Pedagogical Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. 2015. URL: https://doi.org/112,170.1007/978-981-287-532-7_254-1
9. Becker Gary S. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. 3 rd. Edition. University Of Chicago Press, 1994. 244 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001
10. Basovskiy L. E., Basovskaya E. N. Problema formirovaniya sistemoy obrazovaniya chelovecheskogo kapitala Rossii // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika. 2022. №. 5. S. 24-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-9111-2022-10-5-24-29 (data obrascheniya: 07.06.2023). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EDEJCZ
11. Basovskiy L. E. Degradaciya osnovnoy funkcii obrazovaniya kak upravlencheskaya problema // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika. 2023. №. 1. S. 61-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-9111-2023-11-1-61-66 (data obrascheniya: 07.06.2023). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EDHISP
12. Bolonskiy process kak ob'ekt monitoringovogo issledovaniya (2001-2009 gody): prezentaciya osnovnyh rezul'tatov. Informacionno-bibliograficheskoe izdanie. – M.: Issledovatel'skiy centr problem kachestva podgotovki specialistov, 2009. – 126 s.
13. Kuz'minov Ya., Sorokin P., Frumin I. Obschie i special'nye navyki kak komponenty chelovecheskogo kapitala: novye vyzovy dlya teorii i praktiki obrazovaniya. Forsayt i upravlenie naukoy, tehnologiyami i tehnologiyami, 2019, t. 13, № 2, s. 19–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2019.2.19.41 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NFSVLM
14. Gilyazova, O. S. Koncepciya i freymvork universal'nyh kompetenciy v rossiyskom vysshem obrazovanii: osmyslenie ih znacheniya i osobennostey / O. S. Gilyazova, A. N. Zamoschanskaya, I. I. Zamoschanskiy // Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologiya. 2023. T. 11. № 5. URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/60PDMN523.pdf DOI:https://doi.org/10.15862/60PDMN523 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZNQUVA
15. Knyaginina N.V., Puchkov E.V. Vnutrennie sistemy ocenki kachestva obrazovaniya v dokumentah rossiyskih universitetov: obespechenie kachestva ili ego vidimost'? Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, 2024,№ 3 (2), ss. 100–135. https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-17221 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KYMBOM
16. Mescon Michael H, Albert Michael, Franklin Khedouri Franklin. Management. Harper & Row, 1988. 777 p.
17. Tennent K.D. The Age of Strategy: From Drucker and Design to Planning and Por-ter. In: Bowden B., Muldoon J., Gould A., McMurray A. (eds) The Palgrave Hand-book of Management History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62348-1_36-1
18. Peters T. Re-Imagine! Business Excellence in a Disruptive Age. Published March 2006. 352 p.
19. Seddon J. Freedom from Command & Control. Rethinking Management for Lean Service. New York: Productivity Press, 2005. 232 p.
20. Avdashkin A. A., Pass A. A. Podhody k opredeleniyu ponyatiya «kachestvo obrazovaniya» // Nauchno-metodicheskoe obespechenie ocenki kachestva obrazovaniya. 2018. №2 (5). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/podhody-k-opredeleniyu-ponyatiya-kachestvo-obrazovaniya-1 (data obrascheniya: 28.07.2025).
21. Basovskiy L.E., Protas'ev V.B. Upravlenie kachestvom: Uchebnik. – 3-e izd. pererab i dop. M.: INFRA-M. 2016. 231 s.
22. Savina, I. V. Ekonomicheskaya ocenka kachestva vysshego obrazovaniya: Monogr. / I. V. Savina, L. E. Basovskiy. – Tula: Izd-vo Tul. gos. ped. un-ta im. L. N. Tolstogo, 2012. – 161 s.
