Russian Federation
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
The article considers the assessment of the level of human potential and the degree of its development at the level of a particular organization as a socioeconomic system. Both historical and recent strategies for assessing human potential, which is a complex of various obvious and hidden qualities of the population, have been investigated. Special attention is paid to the weighted amount method, which is recognized as reliable and has minimal subjectivity in assessing human potential, which makes it possible to adequately correct the significance of its elements. The need to accurately determine the importance of various components of human potential and their basic competencies was emphasized. A system is presented that integrates the criteria that determine the personnel of the organization in the context of the overall mission and goal, confirming the possibilities of practical use of this economic category. Practical recommendations are proposed on the method of data collection and the method of econometric assessment of human potential in management practice.
management, human potential, indicators, assessment methods, latent variables
1. Genkin B.M. Ekonomika i sociologiya truda [Tekst] / B.M. Genkin. — M.: Norma, 2007. — 448 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QRXSIH
2. Elohova I.V. Podhody k diagnostike samoorganizuyuschihsya i samorazvivayuschihsya sistem dlya innovacionnogo predpriyatiya [Tekst] / I.V. Elohova, M.A. Molodchik // Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. — 2012. — № 93. S. 724–728. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PBXPSR
3. Zaslavskaya T.N. Chelovecheskiy potencial v sovremennom transformacionnom processe [Tekst] / T.N. Zaslavskaya // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. — 2005. — № 3. — S. 13–25. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OOUYRP
4. Lipatov S.A. Social'nopsihologicheskie faktory organizacionnoy priverzhennosti sotrudnikov (na primere kommercheskih organizaciy) [Tekst] / S.A. Lipatov, H.I. Sinchuk // Organizacionnaya psihologiya. — 2015. № 4.
5. Mitina O.V. Modelirovanie latentnyh izmeneniy s pomosch'yu strukturnyh uravneniy [Tekst] / O.V. Mitina // Eksperimental'naya psihologiya. — 2008. — № 1. S. 131–148. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KYXPJX
6. Ot samoorganizacii k samorazvitiyu: smena paradigmy menedzhmenta [Tekst]: monografiya / pod nauch. red. S.V. Komarova; predisl. akad. A.I. Tatarkina. — Ekaterinburg: Int ekonomiki UrO RAN, 2013. — 257 s.
7. Sabetova T.V. Primenenie metoda latentnyh peremennyh v upravlenii personalom [Tekst] / T.V. Sabetova // RJOAS. — 2017. — № 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2017-06.14; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YTBZPW
8. Senge P. Pyataya disciplina. Iskusstvo i praktika obuchayuscheysya organizacii [Tekst] / P. Senge: per. s angl. B. Pinskera, I. Tatarinovoy. — M.: Olimp Biznes, 2009. — 417 s.
9. Smol'kin V.P. Mehanizmy transformacii upravleniya chelovecheskimi resursami v konkurentosposobnost' organizacii [Tekst] / V.P. Smol'kin, O.F. Udalov, V.V. Kutepova // Vestnik Akademii znaniy. — 2023. № 6. — S. 375–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350601529.8306; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XCZQSE
10. Snisarenko I.M. Samorazvitie sotrudnikov kak metod razvitiya personala [Tekst] / I.M. Snisarenko // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyy vestnik. 2017. — № 63. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZJTALZ
11. Sidel'cev S.V. Metodologicheskie podhody k ocenke trudovogo potenciala personala predpriyatiya [Tekst] / S.V. Sidel'cev // Problemy i perspektivy ekonomiki i upravleniya: materialy II Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. SanktPeterburg, iyun' 2013 g.). — SPb.: Renome, 2013. — S. 90–92. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VTDZDN
12. Shirokova G. Predprinimatel'skaya napravlennost' rossiyskih firm: rol' vneshney sredy [Tekst] / G. Shirokova, K. Bogatyreva, T. Belyaeva // Forsayt NTI Pravitel'stvo. — 2015. — № 9. — S. 6–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459X.2015.3.6.25
13. Scherbina N.A. Ekspressmetod ocenki priverzhennosti sotrudnikov kompanii [Tekst] / N.A. Scherbina, N.O. Burmistrova // MNIZh. — 2017. — № 82.
14. Aragón J., García Morales V., Cordón Pozo E. Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance: lessons from Spain // Industrial Marketing Management. 2007, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 349–359.
15. Henseler J., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M. Using partial least squares path modeling in international advertising research: Basic concepts and recent issues. in Okzaki, S., ed. Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications in marketing and related fields. Berlin: Springer, 2012, pp. 252–276.
16. Garvin D.A., Edmondson A.C., Gino F. Is yours a learning organization? // HBR. 2008, March, pp. 109–116.
17. Goodman L.A. Snowball Sampling // Ann. Math. Stat. 1961, vol. 32, pp. 148–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148
18. Marsick V.J., Watkins, K.E. Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: the dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire // Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2003, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 132–151.
19. Patterson M.G., West M.A., Shackleton V.J. Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2005, vol. 26(4), pp. 379–408.
20. Rasch, G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests / G. Rasch. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research, 1960, 160 p.
