The article contains the complex analysis of the existing system of the liability for violation of the tax legislation, including the problem of correlation of the tax, administrative and criminal liability for violations of the tax legislation; competition of the jurisdictional bodies, authorized to consider cases on violations of the tax legislation in limited action with prejudice; the shortcomings of the new procedure of bringing to responsibility for the tax offence and the institute of exemption from liability for tax crimes; the ineffectiveness of combating tax crime. According to the analysis the author have made a conclusion that there are systemic problems in the sphere of responsibility for violations of the tax legislation, which cannot be overcome by conservative methods. A radical revising of correlation between various types of responsibility for violation of the tax legislation and creation of a specialized tax justice are required. The article suggests a number of alternative directions for the complex reforming of the tax, administrative and criminal responsibility in the sphere of taxation.
tax liability, tax offence, tax crime, active repentance, prejudice, exemption from criminal liability, tax penalties.
1. Abshilava G. V. Soglasitel´nye protsedury v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monografiya. M., 2012.
2. Aleksandrova I. A. Dogovornoy sposob razresheniya ugolovno-pravovykh sporov, voznikayushchikh v sfere predprinimatel´skoy deyatel´nosti. Ugolovnyy protsess. 2012. № 9.
3. Bazhanov S. Vzaimodeystvie Sledstvennogo komiteta s politsiey i nalogovymi organami. Zakonnost´. 2011. № 10.
4. Bezlepkin B. T. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual´nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy). M., 2012.
5. Belousov A. V. Protsedury razresheniya nalogovykh sporov po zakonodatel´stvu SShA: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008.
6. Biznes-soobshchestvo vystupaet za sokhranenie deystvuyushchego poryadka presledovaniya po nalogovym prestupleniyam. 2013. 8 noyab. URL: http://www.garant.ru/news/504090 (data obrashcheniya: 16.03.2015).
7. Dikarev I. S. Povod dlya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnykh del o nalogovykh prestupleniyakh. Nalogi. 2012. № 3.
8. Doklad ob osushchestvlenii Federal´noy nalogovoy sluzhboy gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) v sootvetstvuyushchikh sferakh deyatel´nosti i ob effektivnosti takogo kontrolya (nadzora) v 2013 godu. URL: http://www.nalog.ru/rn77/related_activities/statistics_and_analytics/effectiveness/#t10 (data obrashcheniya: 26.03.2015).
9. Kalinina L. A. Nekotorye sovremennye problemy administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narusheniya finansovogo i nalogovogo zakonodatel´stva. Zakonodatel´stvo. 1999. № 8.
10. Otvetstvennost´ za narushenie finansovogo zakonodatel´stva: nauch.-prakt. posobie / R. Yu. Abrosimov, O. A. Akopyan, Ya. V. Burkavtsova i dr.; otv. red. I. I. Kucherov. M, 2014.
11. Pepelyaev S. G. Kommentariy k glave 15 «Obshchie polozheniya ob otvetstvennosti za sovershenie nalogovykh pravonarusheniy» chasti pervoy NK RF. Vash nalogovyy advokat. 2000. № 1.
12. Svodnye statisticheskie svedeniya o sostoyanii sudimosti v Rossii za 2013 god URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&;item=2362 (data obrashcheniya: 26.03.2015).
13. Smirnyy A. Sistemnyy krizis deyatel´nosti pravookhranitel´nykh organov v sfere protivodeystviya nalogovoy prestupnosti. URL: http://blog.pravo.ru/blog/fvlaw/6235.html (data obrashcheniya: 16.03.2015).
14. Solov´ev I. Nakazanie otmenyaetsya. Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2013. 12 fevr.
15. Solov´ev I. N. Preyuditsiya po delam o nalogovykh prestupleniyakh. Nalogovaya politika i praktika. 2010. № 6.
16. Tolstopyatenko G. P. Evropeyskoe nalogovoe pravo. Sravnitel´no-pravovoe issledovanie. M., 2001.
17. Filimonov A. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnykh del o nalogovykh prestupleniyakh: chto mozhet izmenit´sya? URL: http://www.garantinfo.ru/news/articles/3005(data obrashcheniya: 16.03.2015).
