CORRELATION OF STATE REGULATION AND SELF-REGULATION METHODS
Authors:
2.
Russian University of Transport
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 0
to 0
Status:
Published
Received:
10.10.2016
Accepted:
10.10.2016
Published:
10.10.2016
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
state regulation, self-regulation, economic relations.
Abstract (English):
Regulation of economic relations is not homogeneous both in terms of its contents in statics, and in terms of specific methods, forms and means of legal influence in dynamics. An important role in regulation of economic relations at the present stage of their development belongs to self-regulation institutions. This entrusted science with a task of justification of this form of economic interaction and integration within the economic activity regulation mechanism. The issues of correlation of state regulation and self-regulation are debatable and still unsettled definitely: development and transformation of forms of state regulation of economy; understanding of self-regulation as an antipode of state regulation. The authors came to a conclusion that self-regulation is a specific instrument of regulation of economic relations which cannot be considered as a derivative of state regulation or be defined at the discretion of private law subjects. As a consequence, methods of state regulation and selfregulation shall differ. Tasks and methods of self-regulation and state regulation of economic relations are different. At state regulation, an authorization-based method prevails, while at self-regulation the principle “everything which is not forbidden is allowed” is used. This is manifested in the following aspects of correlation of these two mechanisms of regulation of economic relations.
Regulation of economic relations is not homogeneous both in terms of its contents in statics, and in terms of specific methods, forms and means of legal influence in dynamics. An important role in regulation of economic relations at the present stage of their development belongs to self-regulation institutions. This entrusted science with a task of justification of this form of economic interaction and integration within the economic activity regulation mechanism. The issues of correlation of state regulation and self-regulation are debatable and still unsettled definitely: development and transformation of forms of state regulation of economy; understanding of self-regulation as an antipode of state regulation. The authors came to a conclusion that self-regulation is a specific instrument of regulation of economic relations which cannot be considered as a derivative of state regulation or be defined at the discretion of private law subjects. As a consequence, methods of state regulation and selfregulation shall differ. Tasks and methods of self-regulation and state regulation of economic relations are different. At state regulation, an authorization-based method prevails, while at self-regulation the principle “everything which is not forbidden is allowed” is used. This is manifested in the following aspects of correlation of these two mechanisms of regulation of economic relations.
Keywords:
state regulation, self-regulation, economic relations.
state regulation, self-regulation, economic relations.
1. Egorova M. A. Obyazatel´noe samoregulirovanie kak chastnopravovoy institut organizatsii biznesa. Gosudarstvo i biznes v sisteme pravovykh koordinat. M., 2014.
2. Ershova I. V. Samoregulirovanie predprinimatel´skoy i professional´noy deyatel´nosti. Pravo i biznes. Prilozhenie k zhurnalu «Predprinimatel´skoe pravo». 2014. № 3.
3. Kryuchkova P. V. Samoregulirovanie khozyaystvennoy deyatel´nosti: institutsional´nyy analiz. M., 2005.
4. Romanikhin A. V. Samoregulirovanie po-rossiyski. Zakonodatel´stvo i ekonomika. 2004. № 3.
5. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v fokuse prava. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 10.
