The article reveals the specifics of the political interview presenting its main features. The author tells the difference between the concepts “dialogue” and “discourse”, “emotion” and “expressiveness” and further defines the principles and indicates the laws of dialogue which carries information through audio and video components. The paper gives various definitions of political interview, which is represented by dialogue communication, exchange of remarks of interlocutors and subjective character of the information received that is explained by the influence of personal emotions and assessments. The author goes on to stress persuasiveness as a specific feature of political interview explaining that it aims at changing or building the recipient’s certain attitude to people, facts or events. In conclusion the paper states that political discourse studies do not only concentrate on principles, emotions and assessments — each political interview is characterized by a specific axiological situation that implies building a political interview model with a view of defining its axiological and ethno-lingual characteristics. That could serve as a cultural source for interpreters, translators and IR journalists. The genre of political interview taking a high position by its frequency of occurrence in the communicative practice expands its borders, occupying its own niche in the general political discourse.
political interviews, dialogue, the interviewer, intervyutruemy, discourse, emotion, expression of, estimation, dialogic speech, persuasive, persuasive communication, political dialogue, communicative practice, the political discourse.
Коммуникативная практика в политическом дискурсе в последние десятилетия привлекает внимание политологов, психологов, социологов, лингвистов.
1. Bol’shoy tolkovyy psikhologicheskiy slovar’ [Bolshoy explanatory psychological dictionary]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003. 1150 p.
2. Van Deyk T.A. Yazyk. Poznanie, Kommunikatsiya [Language. Cognition, Communication]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989. 320 p.
3. Voevoda E.V. Obuchenie lingvokul’ture i kommunikatsii v us¬loviyakh globalizatsii [Lingvokulture Education and communica¬tion in the context of globalization]. V sbornike: Yazyk i kom¬munikatsiya v kontekste kul’tury. Materialy 5-y Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Ryazanskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet imeni S.A. Esenina [In: Language and communication in the context of culture. Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific Conference. Ryazan State University named after SA Esenina]. 2010, pp. 36-41.
4. Golanova E.I. Ustnyy publichnyy dialog: zhanr interv’yu [Oral public dialogue: the genre of the interview]. E.I. Golanova v knige «Zhanr interv’yu» [EI “Genre interview” Golanova in the book]. St. Petersburg. gos. un-t Publ., 1993. 309 p.
5. Dodonov B.I. Emotsiya kak tsennost’ [Emotion as value]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1978. 272 p.
6. Ionova S.V. Novoe v issledovanii teksta [A new study in the text]. Volgograd, Volgogradskoe nauchnoe izdatel’stvo Publ., 2012. 244 p.
7. Kazartseva O.M. Kul’tura rechevogo obshcheniya: teoriya i praktika obucheniya [Culture of speech communication: theory and practice of teaching]. Moscow, Fakel Publ., 2013. 511 p.
8. Konovalov V.N. Slovar’ po politologii [In Political Science Dictionary]. Rostov on Don, Feniks Publ., 2010. 318 p.
9. Lavrinova N.I. Tekstoobrazuyushchie kharakteristiki politichesk¬ogo interv’yu [Text-forming characteristics of the political inter¬view]. Vestnik Pomorskogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki [Pomor University Bulletin. Ser .: The hu¬manities and social sciences]. 2009, I. 5, pp. 68-71.
10. Leont’ev A.N. Deyatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’ [Activities. Con-sciousness. Personality]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1975. 304 p.
11. Mikhal’skaya A.K. Polevaya struktura politicheskogo diskursa. Metod analiza i opisaniya rechevogo povedeniya politika v politicheskom interv’yu [Field structure of political discourse. The method of analysis and description of verbal behavior policy in a political interview]. Zhurnalistika v 1999 godu. Ch. 5 [Journalism in 1999. Part 5].Moscow, 2000, pp. 28-70.
12. Romanenko N.M. Dukhovnost’ kak spetsifika natsional’nogo mentaliteta [Spirituality as the specifics of national mentality]. Voprosy gumanitarnykh nauk [Questions humanities]. 2009, I. 6, pp. 126-128.
13. Ter-Minasova S.G. Yazyk i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya [Language and Intercultural Communication]. Moscow, Slovo/ Slovo Publ., 2000. 624 p.
14. Ekman Paul. Psychology of emotions. Izd-vo: Piter, 2010. 319 p. [Elektronnyy resurs]. - Available at: http://www.nntt.org/ viewtopic.php?f=632&t=44158 (accessed 14 July 2016).
15. Chaiken S., Liberman A., Eagly A. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context / In: J. Uleman & J. Bargh (Eds.). Unintended thought. New York: Guilford, 1989. P. 212-252.
