Irkutsk, Irkutsk region, Russian Federation
Irkutsk, Irkutsk region, Russian Federation
Irkutsk, Irkutsk region, Russian Federation
Irkutsk, Irkutsk region, Russian Federation
The purpose of the research was to establish main causes of development and outcomes of adhesive obstruction.We analyzed the outcomes of treatment of 154 patients with acute intestinal obstruction. The following data were taken into consideration: age, gender, surgeries in past medical history, terms of adhesions manifestations, clinical symptoms, findings of additional examinations, methods of treatment, outcome. It has been established, that the most frequent causes of adhesions were appendectomy (23%), stomach operations (21 %) and gynecological interventions (14 %). After surgeries performed in conditions of regional hospitals, adhesions developed after appendectomy, gynecological operations and interventions on the intestine. In patients operated in city hospitals intestinal obstruction more often occurred after extensive operations on the stomach, appendix, and after gynecological interventions. Urgent surgical interventions more often led to adhesive process in the abdominal cavity (63 %). Mortality made 5.8 %. Causes of death were intestinal fistulas and abdominal sepsis.Thus, acute adhesive intestinal obstruction as an extreme form of abdominal adhesions continues to be an urgent medical issue.
adhesive intestinal obstruction, peritoneal adhesions, surgical treatment
1. .AyushinovaNI, ShuryginaIA, ShuryginMG, Glin-skayaEV (2014). Assessment of the severity of abdominal adhesions [Otsenka vyrazhennosti spaechnogo protsessa v bryushnoy polosti]. Sibirskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal (Ir-kutsk), (7), 10-14.
2. AjushinovaNI, ShuryginaIA, ShuryginMG, Pana-syukAI (2011). Current approaches to the prevention of abdominal adhesions [Sovremennye podkhody k profilak-tike spaechnogo protsessa v bryushnoy polosti]. Sibirskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal (Irkutsk), 105 (6), 16-20.
3. BaranovGA (2006). Late fate of surgical treatment of adhesive ileus [Otdalennye rezul’taty operativnogo ustraneniya spaechnoy kishechnoy neprokhodimosti]. Khirurgiya, (7), 56-58.
4. BurlevV A, DubinskayaED, GasparovAS (2009). Peritoneal adhesions: from pathogenesis to prevention[Peritoneal’nye spayki: ot patogeneza do profilaktiki]. Problemy reproduktsii, (3), 36-44.
5. MatveevNL, ArutyunyanDY (2007). Intra-abdomi-nal adhesions - an underestimated problem (literature review) [Vnutribryushnye spayki - nedootsenivae-maya problema (obzor literatury)]. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya, 13, 60-69.
6. TarasenkoEI (2007). Acute adhesive small bowel obstruction: diagnosis and treatment [Ostraya spaechnaya tonkokishechnaya neprokhodimost’: diagnostika i lech-enie]. Annaly khirurgii, (4), 61-65.
7. ShavaleevRR, PlechevVV, KornilaevPG, PashkovSA, DunyushkinSE (2005). Prevention of peritoneal com-missures in patients with postoperative ventral hernias Profilaktika spaechnoy bolezni bryushiny u bol’nykh s posleoperatsionnymi ventral’nymi gryzhami]. Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal, 86 (1), 24-26.
8. AmidPK (2002). Hyaluronate does not prevent adhesions. J.Surg.Res. 107 (2), 219-222.
9. De CherneyAH, di ZeregaGS (1997). Clinical problem of intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion forma-tion following general surgery and the use of adhesion prevention barriers. Surg. Clin. North Am., (77), 671-688.
10. GutmannJN, PenziasAS, DiamondMP (1995). Adhesions in reproductive surgery. In: Reproductive Med-icine and Surgery; WallachEE, ZaccurHA (eds.), 681-693.
11. MenziesD (2009). Peritoneal adhesions: Inci-dence, cause, and prevention. Biomaterials, (30), 3075-3083.
12. MettlerL, AudebertA, Lehmann-WillenbrockE et al. (2004). A randomized, prospective, controlled, multi-center clinical trial of a sprayable, site-specific adhesion barrier system in patients undergoing myomectomy. Fertil. Steril., (82), 398-404.
13. O’LearyDP, CoakleyJB (1992). The influence of suturing and sepsis on the development of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl., (74), 134.
14. RayNF, DentonWG, ThamerM, HendersonSC, PerryS (1998). Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J. Am. Coll. Surg., (186), 1-9.
15. WallwienerD, MeyerA, BastertG (1998). Adhe-sion formation of the parietal and visceral peritoneum: An explanation for the controversy on the use of autologous and alloplastic barriers? Fertil. Steril,, (69), 132-137.
