Belgorod, Belgorod, Russian Federation
The article deals with the issues of evaluation of measurement of life quality as a result of the activities of the municipal bodies. A complex research of quality of the municipal authority in Russia was carried out in the regions of the country during 2014 – 2015. The study results of the International Research Center of the Modern Humanitarian Academy and the Center of Social and Conservative Policy in the Central Federal District «Center» led to the conclusion about modern quality of the municipal authority and the partial accordance of the level of the society needs for ensuring a worthy life quality. The analysis of the research results shows that a sustainable and mass demand of the population for a positive change in the situation in the municipalities has already been formed. The ways of improving the municipal authorities’ activity are substantiated in the form of new requirements to the quality of government, maximum involvement of citizens in all stages of the adoption of the most important state decisions, the development of the institutions of the functional representation of group interests and also strengthening of solidarity, the middle class and the civil society.
municipal authority, life quality, social expectations, groups of interests, effectiveness of administration, mechanism of administration, region
1. Danakin N.S. Sotsial´naya tekhnologiya kak sposob optimizatsii tselevogo upravleniya v munitsipal´noy sfere. Srednerusskiy vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk. - 2013. - № 3.-S.46- 55.
2. Slatinov V.B., Merkulova K.G. Strukturnye i kadrovye effekty ocherednogo etapa Rossiyskoy munitsipal´noy reformy v regionakh Tsentral´nogo Chernozem´ya. Srednerusskiy vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk. -2015. - T. 10. - № 5. - S. 33 - 37.
3. Tyurikov A.G., Yakunin A.S. Otsenka sotsial´noy effektivnosti upravleniya regionom po kriteriyu kachestva zhizni naseleniya. Vestnik Voennogo universiteta. - 2011. - №1 (25). - S. 111 - 117. - URL: http://www.nic-nauka.ru/vvu-1-2011/ (data obrashcheniya: 13. 06.2016).
4. Khans de Bryuyn Upravlenie po rezul´tatam v gosudarstvennom sektore. - M.: Institut kompleksnykh strategicheskikh issledovaniy, 2005. - 192 s.
5. Tselyutina T.V. Konsul´tatsionno-ekspertnye instituty v upravlenii obshchestvennymi protsessami: avtoref. diss. … kand. sotsiol. nauk. - Belgorod, 2007.
6. Anderson, C., Galinsky, A.D. (2006) Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, R. 511-536.
7. Best practice in business advisory, counselling and information services (2002) UN. Econ. commiss. for Europe. Geneva. - N.Y.; Geneva: UN. - VIII. - 89 p.
8. Bijl, R. (2011) ‘Never waste a good crisis: Towards social sustainable development’, Social Indicators Research 102, R. 157-168.
9. Lammers, J., Stapel, D.A. (2009) How Power Influences Moral Thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 279-289.
10. Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge (Mass.). - Harvard University Press, 208r.
11. Quality of life: Problems of assessment and measurement (1983) Unesco, Socio-economic studies, 5, 9-48. Paris: Unesco.
12. Santos, L.D., Martins, I. (2013) The Monitoring System on Quality of Life of the City of Porto. Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases series IV. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg, New York, London.
13. Shin D., Johnson D. (1978) Avowed happiness as overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5 (4), 475-492.
14. Tretyakova, L.A., Tselyutina, T.V. and etc. (2015) Function Representation of the Civil Society Institutions Within the Transforming Sustainability of the Regional Development. International Business Management. Volume: 9, Issue: 5, 963-965.
15. Truman, D. (1971) The Governmental Process. Political Interests and Public Opinion. - N.Y., Knopf, 576.
