from 01.01.2014 to 01.01.2019
BGTU im V.G. Shuhova, arhitekturnyy institut (architectury, dozent)
from 01.01.2014 to 01.01.2019
Russian Federation
VAK Russia 05.17.00
VAK Russia 05.23.00
UDC 71
Russian Library and Bibliographic Classification 812
Russian Trade and Bibliographic Classification 8521
BISAC ARC014000 Historic Preservation / General
The article compares the double coding scheme developed in the theory of postmodernism with the scheme of spectacular communication, borrowed from the field of theater studies. The idea of “critical architecture” has become a prerequisite for the analysis of communicative schemes. The authors interpret it as an interactive movement organized by axiological programs that combine the positions of consciousness, thinking and reflexive control in the genre self-determination, the prescription of theme and style of the architectural work for the purpose of value management of the project search. The authors identify the subject of role disposition, in which the architect emphasizes the dramatic role of the compiler or stylist of the literary text. The method and organizational forms of dispositional thinking, one of which is a critical architecture, rationalizing the design of declarations of artistic directions are considered
axiological program, dispositive reflection, design staging, scenario prescriptions, critical architecture, simulacrum
1. Isenman Peter, Koolhaus Ram. Super critic [Superkritika]. M.: Strelka Press, 2017. 218 p. (rus)
2. Andreeva E.Yu. Postmodernism. Art of the second half of the twentieth - the beginning of the XXI century [Postmodernizm. Iskusstvo vtoroj poloviny HKH - nachala XXI veka SPb]. ABC-Classic, 2007. 488 p. (rus)
3. Baudrillard Jean. Simulacra and Simulation [Simulyakry i simulyaciya]. M.: Postum, 2018. 320p. (rus)
4. Robert Venturi, Scott Brown Denise, Eisenour Stephen. Las Vegas lessons: forgotten symbolism of architectural form [Uroki Las-Vegasa: zabytyj simvolizm arhitekturnoj formy]. M.: Strelka Press, 2015. 212 p. (rus)
5. Glazychev V.L. Organization of architectural design [Organizaciya arhitekturnogo proektirovaniya]. M .: Stroyizdat, 1977. 187 p. (rus)
6. Gorozhankin V.K., Lonshakov D.A., Pusny L.A. Exposition Modeling [Ekspozicionnoe modelirovanie]. Bulletin of BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov. 2017. №11. Pp. 64-69. (rus)
7. Jenks C. The language of architecture of post-modernism [Yazyk arhitektury post-modernizma]. M .: stroiizdat, 1985. 136 p.
8. Jones C.J. Engineering and artistic design. Modern methods of project analysis [Inzhenernoe i hudozhe-stvennoe konstruirovanie. Sovremennye metody proektnogo analiza]. M.: Mir, 1976. 375 p. (rus)
9. Evreinov N.N. Theater for yourself [Teatr dlya sebya]. St. Petersburg: Neva, 2005 No. 7. 90 p. (rus)
10. Zambien V. Talking architecture, characteristic architecture, written architecture [Arhitektura govoryashchaya, arhitektura harakternaya, arhitektura napisannaya]. Arhitektura Mira. Materialy konferencii “Zapad-Vostok: lichnost' v istorii arhitektury. Vypusk 4. NII Teorii arhitektury i gradostroitel'stva. M.: ARCHI-TECTURA, 1994. p. 141-149. (rus)
11. Le Corbusier. New spirit in the architecture tour [Novyj duh v arhitekture]. M.: Strelka Press, 2017. 120 seconds. (rus)
12. Lefevre V.A. Conflict Structures [Konfliktuyushchie struktury]. M .: Soviet Radio, 1973. 158 p. (rus)
13. Sidorenko V.F., Kuzmichev L.A., G.Gisaretsky O.I., Pereverzev L.B. Organizational programming of design systems [Organizacionnoe programmirovanie dizajn-sistem]. Trudy VNIITE, Tekhnicheskaya estetika №26: Problemy organizacii deyatel'nosti po sozdaniyu dizajn-programm. M., 1980. Pp. 11-42. (rus)
