from 01.01.2012 until now
Russian Federation
VAC 12.00.03 Гражданское право; предпринимательское право; семейное право; международное частное право
VAC 12.00.01 Теория и история права и государства; история учений о праве и государстве
VAC 12.00.08 Уголовное право и криминология; уголовно-исполнительное право
VAC 12.00.09 Уголовный процесс
VAC 09.00.01 Онтология и теория познания
VAC 09.00.13 Философская антропология, философия культуры
VAC 13.00.01 Общая педагогика, история педагогики и образования
VAC 13.00.04 Теория и методика физического воспитания, спортивной тренировки, оздоровительной и адаптивной физической культуры
VAC 13.00.08 Теория и методика профессионального образования
UDK 13 Философия духа. Метафизика духовной жизни
The paper features the problem of correlation between two approaches to the phenomenon of tradition. The value approach sees tradition as a stable and transferable object. The communicative approach considers tradition as a construct that reflects the current perception of the past. The author analyzed the reasons for the formation of positions and their ratio. A phenomenological analysis proved that the separation and opposition of both approaches is structurally conditioned. The transfer of tradition involves its deconstruction, i.e. isolation of its substantial core from the context of the past to reconstruct it in the context of the present. Transfer depends on the type of communication, which, by developing from non-written to digital, increased the gap between the contexts of the transmitter and the recipient. As a result, the tradition is getting more deconstructed, while its core is becoming more susceptible to change. The value and communicative components of the tradition reflect the views on its different parts-reconstruction and deconstruction, respectively. The value approach assumes the point of view from the side of reconstruction, or reproduction of the core of tradition: this approach goes "from within" tradition and denies the deconstructive aspect. The communicative approach is a view from the side of deconstruction while striving to objectify the tradition. The communicative approach demonstrates the core of the tradition, thus putting the subject beyond the frame of values, outside the tradition. Hence, the principle of complementarity should be applied when considering tradition, both in its specific forms and in the conceptual aspect.
reproduction of culture, social inheritance, structure of tradition, the core of the tradition, the context of tradition, the deconstruction of traditions, the reconstruction of tradition
1. Bronner S. J. Explaining Traditions: Folk Behavior in Modern Culture. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2011. 520 p.
2. Ben-Amos D. The Seven Strands of Tradition: Varieties in its Meaning in American Folklore Studies // Journal of Folklore Research. 1984. Vol. 2. № 3. P. 97-131.
3. Polonskaya I. N. Ponyatie tradicii: problema opredeleniya // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Seriya: Obschestvennye nauki. 2006. № 2. S. 6-10.
4. Genon R. Ocherki o tradicii i metafizike / per. s franc. V. Yu. Bystrova. SPb.: Azbuka, 2000. 320 s.
5. Kravchenko A. I. Kul'turologiya. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, Triksta, 2003. 496 s.
6. Kairov V. M. Tradicii i istoricheskiy process. M.: Luch, 1994. 188 s.
7. Chistov K. V. Narodnye tradicii i fol'klor. Ocherki teorii. L.: Nauka, 1986. 304 s.
8. Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990. 808 c.
9. Glassie H. Tradition // Journal of American Folklore. 1995. Vol. 108. № 430. P. 395-412.
10. Arendt H. Tradicii i sovremennaya epoha // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 7: Filosofiya. 1992. № 1. S. 80-95.
11. Hobsbawm E., Ranger T. The Invention of Tradition. N. Y.: Columbia University Press, 1993. 309 p.
12. Giddens A. Beyond Left and Right: The future of radical politics // Concepts and Transformation. 1997. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 107-118.
13. Hopper L. M., Spiteri A., Lambeth S. P., Schapiro S. J., Horner V., Whiten A. Experimental studies of traditions and underlying transmission processes in chimpanzees // Animal Behaviour. 2007. Vol. 73. № 6. P. 1021-1032.
14. Yadgar Y. Tradition // Human Studies. 2013. Vol. 36. Iss. 4. P. 451-470. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9294-9
15. Hupeniya N. R. Smyslovoe mnogoobraziya ponyatiya tradiciya // Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke. 2016. № 2. S. 12-27.
16. Ong W. J. Orality and Literacy: the Technologizing of the Word. London; N. Y.: Methuen, 1982. 256 p.
17. Shils E. Tradition and Liberty: Antinomy and Interdependence // Ethics. 1958. Vol. XLVIII. № 3. R. 153-165.
18. Assman Ya. Kul'turnaya pamyat'. Pis'mo, pamyat' o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost' v vysokih kul'turah drevnosti. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2004. 368 c.
19. Giddens E. Uskol'zayuschiy mir: kak globalizaciya menyaet nashu zhizn'. M.: Ves' mir, 2004. 116 s.
20. Rudolph L. I., Rudolph S. H. The Modernity of Tradition: Political Development in India. University of Chicago Press, 1984. 316 p.
21. Bronner S. J. Explaining Traditions: Folk Behavior in Modern Culture. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2011, 520.
22. Ben-Amos D. The Seven Strands of Tradition: Varieties in its Meaning in American Folklore Studies. Journal of Folklore Research, 1984, 2(3): 97-131.
23. Polonskaya I. N. The concept of tradition: the problem of definition. Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Severo-Kavkazskii region. Seriia: Obshchestvennye nauki, 2006, (2): 6-10. (In Russ.)
24. Guenon R. Essays on tradition and metaphysics, transl. Bystrov V. Yu. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka, 2000, 320. (In Russ.)
25. Kravchenko A. I. Culturology. Moscow: Academicheskii proekt, Triksta, 2003, 496. (In Russ.)
26. Kairov V. M. Tradition and historical process. Moscow: Luch, 1994, 188. (In Russ.)
27. Chistov K. V. Folk traditions and folklore. Essays theory. Leningrad: Nauka, 1986, 304. (In Russ.)
28. Weber M. Selected Works. Moscow: Progress, 1990, 808. (In Russ.)
29. Glassie H. Tradition. Journal of American Folklore, 1995, 108(430): 395-412.
30. Arendt H. Tradition and the modern era. Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 7: Filosofiya, 1992, (1): 80-95. (In Russ.)
31. Hobsbawm E., Ranger T. The Invention of Tradition. N. Y.: Columbia University Press, 1993, 309.
32. Giddens A. Beyond Left and Right: The future of radical politics. Concepts and Transformation, 1997, 2(1): 107-118.
33. Hopper L. M., Spiteri A., Lambeth S. P., Schapiro S. J., Horner V., Whiten A. Experimental studies of traditions and underlying transmission processes in chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 2007, 73(6): 1021-1032.
34. Yadgar Y. Tradition. Human Studies, 2013, 36(4): 451-470. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9294-9
35. Khupeniya N. R. The semantic diversity of the concept of tradition. Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke, 2016, (2): 12-27. (In Russ.)
36. Ong W. J. Orality and Literacy: the Technologizing of the Word. London; N. Y.: Methuen, 1982, 256.
37. Shils E. Tradition and Liberty: Antinomy and Interdependence. Ethics, 1958, XLVIII(3): 153-165.
38. Asman Ya. Cultural memory. Letter, memory of the past and political identity in the high cultures of antiquity. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul'tury, 2004, 368. (In Russ.)
39. Giddens A. A slipping world: how globalization is changing our lives. Moscow: Ves' mir, 2004, 116. (In Russ.)
40. Rudolph L. I., Rudolph S. H. The Modernity of Tradition: Political Development in India. University of Chicago Press, 1984, 316.
