The application of symmetry principles in environmental studies is considered. The relationship between the properties of space symmetry and time is discussed. The history of science shows that symmetry allows to explain many phenomena and predict the existence of new properties of the Nature. Therefore, the principal difference between symmetry of crystalline polyhedron and symmetry of living organism should be considered. In the case we deal with atomic structure of solid substance, in the second case we deal with achieving to organization of living substance iso-lated and separately existing in an alien and inert biosphere.
symmetry, theoretical ecology, fluctuating asymmetry, scale, health of environment
1. Shredinger E. Chto takoe zhizn´ s tochki zreniya fiziki?.- M.: Izd-vo inostr. lit-ry, 1947.- 146 s.
2. Odum Yu. Osnovy ekologii.- M.: Mir, 1975.- 740 s.
3. Kuznetsov I.V. Vzaimosvyaz´ fizi-cheskikh teoriy. Vopr. filosofii.- 1963.- № 6.- S. 34-44.
4. Kuznetsov I.V. Struktura fiziche-skoy teorii. Vopr. filosofii.- 1967.- № 11.- S. 86-98.
5. Kuznetsov I.V. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii fiziki (na podstupakh k teorii fizicheskogo poznaniya).- M.: Nauka, 1975.- 296 s.
6. Vittikh V.A. Engineering theories as a basis for integrating deep engineering know-ledge. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering.- 1997.- V. 11.- № 1.- P. 25-30.
7. Meyen S.V. On the structure of theo-retical biology. Lectures in Theoretical Biolo-gy.- Tallinn: Valgus, 1988.- R. 15-21.
8. Rozenberg G.S. Konspekt postroe-niya teoreticheskoy ekologii. Izv. SamNTs RAN.- 2003.- T. 5.- № 2.- S. 189-206.
9. Rozenberg G.S. O putyakh postroeniya teoreticheskoy ekologii. Uspekhi sovr. biol.- 2005.- T. 125.- vyp. 1. S. 14-27.
10. Vernadskiy V.I. O sostoyaniyakh fizicheskogo prostranstva. 1938. / http://vvvasilyev.narod.ru/Kulturol/Vernadski/PVPiS_5.htm.
11. Veyl´ G. Simmetriya.- M.: Nauka, 1968.- 192 s.
12. Kompaneets A.S. Simmetriya v mikro- i makromire.- M.: Nauka, 1978.- 208 s.
13. Urmantsev Yu.A. Simmetriya i asimmetriya razvitiya. Soznanie i fizicheskaya real´nost´.- 1997.- T. 2.- № 2.- S. 80-83.
14. Zakharov V.M., Krysanov E.Yu., Pronin A.V. Metodologiya otsenki zdorov´ya sredy. Bioindikatsiya ekologicheskogo sostoyaniya ravninnykh rek.- M.: Nauka, 2007.- S. 78-86.
15. Kozhara A.V. Struktura poka-zatelya fluktuiruyushchey asimmetrii i ego prigodnost´ dlya populyatsionnykh issledovaniy. Biol. nauki.- 1985.- № 6.- S. 100-103.
16. Zakharov V.M. Asimmetriya zhivot-nykh.- M.: Nauka, 1987.- 161 s.
17. Zakharov V.M., Baranov A.S., Bo-risov V.I. i dr. Zdorov´e sredy: metodika otsenki.- M.: Izd. Tsentra ekol. politiki Rossii, 2000.- 66 s.
18. Palmer A.R., Strobeck C. Fluctuat-ing Asymmetry Analyses Revisited.- Edmon-ton (Alberta, Canada): Univ. Alberta, 2001.- 77 p.
19. Gelashvili D.B., Soldatov E.N., Chuprunov E.V. Mery skhodstva i raznoobra-ziya v otsenke fluktuiruyushchey asimmetrii bilateral´nykh priznakov. Povolzh. ekol. zhurn.- 2004.- № 2.- S. 132-143.
20. Korosov A.V. Spetsial´nye meto-dy biometrii: Ucheb. posobie.- Petroza-vodsk: Izd-vo PetrGU, 2007.- 364 s.
21. Zorina A.A. Normal´naya izmen-chivost´ fluktuiruyushchey asimmetrii zhi-votnykh i rasteniy: Dis. … kand. biol. na-uk.- Tol´yatti, 2009.- 184 s.
22. Zakharov V.M. Zdorov´e sredy: kontseptsiya.- M.: Tsentr ekologicheskoy po-litiki Rossii, 2000.- 30 s.
23. Zakharov V.M., Chubinishvili A.T., Dmitriev S.G. i dr. Zdorov´e sredy: prak-tika otsenki.- M.: Izd. Tsentra ekol. poli-tiki Rossii, 2000.- 318 s.
24. Kozlov M.V. Stabil´nost´ razvi-tiya: mnimaya prostota metodiki (o metodi-cheskom rukovodstve «Zdorov´e sredy: me-todika otsenki»). Zapovedniki i Natsio-nal´nye parki.- 2001.- № 36.- S. 23-27.
25. Stabil´nost´ razvitiya: eshche raz o mnimoy i real´noy prostote metodiki / Kollektiv avtorov prakticheskogo rukovo-dstva dlya zapovednikov «Zdorov´e sredy: metodika otsenki». Zapovedniki i Natsio-nal´nye parki.- 2002.- № 37-38.- S. 40-44.
26. Gelashvili D.B. Eshche raz o sta-bil´nosti razvitiya. Zapovedniki i Na-tsional´nye parki.- 2002.- № 37-38.- S. 45.
27. Palmer A.R. Waltzing with asym-metry: is fluctuating asymmetry a powerful new tool for biologists or just an alluring new dance step?. BioScience.- 1996.- V. 46, № 7.- P. 518-532.
28. Bjorksten T.A., Fowler K., Pomia-kowski A. What does sexual trait FA tell us about stress?. Trends Ecol. Evol.- 2000.- V. 15.- P. 163-166.
29. Palmer A.R., Strobeck C. Fluctuat-ing asymmetry: measurement, analysis, pat-terns. Ann. Rev. of Ecol. and Systematics.- 1986.- V. 17.- P. 391-421.
30. Zakharov V.M., Pankakoski E., Sheftel B.I. et al. Developmental stability and population dynamics in the common shrew, Sorex araneus. Amer. Naturalist.- 1991.- V. 138.- № 4.- P. 797-810.
31. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research.- N. Y.: Freeman, 1981.- 887 p.
32. Kozlov M.V., Wilsey B.J., Koriche-va J., Haukioja E. Fluctuating asymmetry of birch leaves increases under pollution impact. J. Appl. Ecol.- 1996.- V. 33. P. 1489-1495.
33. Simberloff D. A succession of para-digms in ecology: Essentialism to materialism and probabilism. Synthese (Springer Nether-lands).- 1980.- V. 43, № 1.- P. 3-39.
34. McIntosh R. Concept and terminol-ogy of homogeneity in ecology. Ecological Heterogeneity / Ed. by J. Kolasa, S.T.A. Pickett.- N. Y.: Springer Verlag, 1991.- P. 24-46.
35. Rozenberg G.S., Smelyanskiy I.E. Ekologicheskiy mayatnik (Smena paradigm v sovremennoy ekologii). Zhurn. obshch. biol.- 1997.- T. 58, № 4.- S. 5-19.
36. Whittaker R.H., Levin S.A., Root R.B. Niche, habitat and ecotype. Amer. Naturalist.- 1973.- V. 107.- P. 321-338.
37. Whittaker R.H., Levin S.A. The role of mosaic phenomena in natural communities. Theor. Popul. Biol.- 1977.- V. 12.- № 2.- P. 117-139.
38. Vernadskiy V.I. Filosofskie mysli naturalista.- M.: Nauka, 1988.- 520 c.
39. Kolasa J., Rollo C.D. Introduction: the heterogeneity of heterogeneity: a glossary. Ecological Heterogeneity / Ed. by J. Kolasa, S.T.A. Pickett.- N. Y.: Springer Verlag, 1991.- P. 1-23.
40. Waltho N., Kolasa J. Organization of instabilities in multispecies systems: a test of hierarchy theory. Proc. National Acad. of Sci. USA.- 1994.- V. 91. P. 1682-1685.
41. Es´kov V.M., Zimin M.I., Danie-lyan V.V. i dr. Filosofiya i nauki o zhizni. Determinizm, stokhastika i khaos (samoorga-nizatsiya) v opisanii zhizni. Slozhnost´. Razum, Postneklassika.- 2013.- № 1.- S. 24-37.
42. Urmantsev Yu.A. Simmetriya pri-rody i priroda simmetrii.- M.: Mysl´, 1974.- 229 s.
43. Kudrin B.I. Sistemnyy analiz tekhnotsenozov. Elektrifikatsiya metallurgicheskikh predpriyatiy Sibiri. Vyp. 4.- Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomsk. un-ta, 1978.- S. 125-165.
