employee
Russian Federation
employee
employee
Russian Federation
Background: Development of algorithms for estimating the number of radiogenic deaths in a cohort that happened or may happen before an arbitrary moment in time. Algorithms should be based on continuous lifelong risk models and minimize the errors of estimates based on deformable non-radiation models ("seed" models) reflecting the general patterns of Russian mortality, but with the possibility of calibrating according to selected data. Materials and methods: For the study, the databases of the register of liquidators of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident – employees of the enterprises of the Ministry of Atomic Energy of Russia were used. Persons with a non-zero dose of ionizing radiation received as a result of the accident and who were registered in the register until 2018 were selected from the register. There are 7324 men and 655 women in this sample. The number of deaths from the beginning of the observation period until 1996, 2006, 2016 from all causes, as well as from solid cancers and leukemias, was used as a reference data for the calibration. Radiation risk was calculated using UNSCEAR 2006 models. Calibration was performed using the Levenberg – Marquardt method. Results: A general formula was obtained for assessing the excess lifetime risk of death, which is the basis of the developed algorithms. The "seed" models of the risk of death from all causes and from solid cancers and leukemia’s were obtained. In accordance with the purpose of the work, two algorithms have been developed. The first algorithm is intended for direct (without using radiation risk models) estimation of the number of radiation-induced deaths in a cohort. The second uses radiation risk models. The performance of the algorithms was tested using the industry register of liquidators of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident. In particular, a 30 % calculated increase in the estimated number of deaths from radiation-induced solid cancers was recorded using calibrated models. Conclusions: The proposed calculation algorithms for calibrated models provide reliable (if the radiation risk models are considered sufficiently adequate) estimates of the number of Chernobyl deaths for points in time preceding the current one and, presumably, more accurate predictive estimates compared to the calculation algorithm for uncalibrated models. The low sensitivity of the lifelong risk model to variations in the parameters of the background models and the total mortality model makes it possible to apply models calibrated according to the liquidator register to other closely related populations (NPP workers, etc.).
lifetime attributive risk, estimating of radiogenic risk, integral risk, cumulative risk, mortality
1. Normy bezopasnosti MAGATE. Obschie trebovaniya bezopasnosti, chast' 3. [IAEA Safety Standards. General safety requirements, part 3. (In Russ.)].
2. Dawid AP. On Individual Risk.. Synthese. 2017;194:3445-74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0953-4.
3. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly. Annex B. Uncertainties in risk estimates for radiation-induced cancer. 2012:219.
4. Gubin AT, Sakovich VA. Analiz obobschennyh modeley radiogennogo riska. Chast' 1. Modeli MKRZ. Radiaciya i risk. 2016; 25(4): 48-62. [Gubin AT, Sakovich VA. Analysis of generalized models of radiogenic risk. Part 1. ICRP Models. Radiation and Risk. 2016;25(4):48-62 (in Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21870/0131-3878-2016-25-4-48-62.
5. Gubin AT, Sakovich VA. Analiz obobschennyh modeley radiogennogo riska. Chast' 2. Modeli NKDAR OON. Radiaciya i risk. 2016; 25(4): 63-79. [Gubin AT, Sakovich VA. Analysis of generalized models of radiogenic risk. Part 2. ICRP Models. Radiation and Risk. 2016;25(4):63-79 (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21870/0131 -3878-2016-25-4-63-79.
6. Chekin SYu, Lovachev SS, Kascheeva PV, Kascheev VV, Maksyutov MA, Vlasov OK, Schukina NV. Issledovanie sovremennyh modeley radiacionnyh riskov NKDAR OON, MKRZ i VOZ pri ih primenenii dlya ocenki radiacionnyh riskov v situaciyah avariynogo oblucheniya. Radiaciya i risk. 2020;29(2):5-20. [Chekin SYu, Lovachev SS, Kashcheeva PV, Kashcheev VV, Maksyutov MA, Vlasov OK, Shchukina NV. Research of modern models of radiation risks of the UNSC, ICRP and who in their application for assessing radiation risks in emergency situations. Radiation and Risk. 2020;29(2):5-20 (in Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21870/0131-3878-2020-29-2-5-20.
7. Gorskiy AI, Maksyutov MA, Tumanov KA, Schukina NV, Chekin SYu, Ivanov VK. Neparametricheskiy analiz radiacionnyh riskov smertnosti sredi likvidatorov posledstviy avarii na ChAES. Radiacionnaya biologiya. Radioekologiya. 2016;56(2):138-148. [Gorsky AI, Maksyutov MA, Tumanov KA, Shchukina NV, Chekin SYu, Ivanov VK. Nonparametric analysis of radiation risks of mortality among liquidators of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident. Radiation biology. Radioecology. 2016;56(2):138-148 (in Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869803116020065.
8. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly. Annex A. Epidemiological studies of radiation and cancer. 2006:310.
9. Sakovich VA, Gubin AT. Metodicheskie osnovy razrabotki dokumentov po opredeleniyu znacheniy radiogennogo riska smerti, obuslovlennogo oblucheniem v predelah, ustanovlennyh dlya kontroliruemyh usloviy. Rekomendacii FMBA Rossii 21.07.2016. [Sakovich VA, Gubin AT. Methodical bases of development of documents on determination of values of radiogenic risk of death caused by irradiation within the limits established for controlled conditions. Recommendations of the FMBA of Russia 21.07.2016 (In Russ.)].
10. Ulanowski A, Kaiser JC, Schneider U, Walsh L. On prognostic estimates of radiation risk in medicine and radiation protection. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics. 2019;58(3):305-19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-019-00794-1.
11. Belyh LN, Biryukov AP, Vasil'ev EV, Nevzorov VP. Ocenki pozhiznennogo radiogennogo riska onkologicheskoy smertnosti i zabolevaemosti. Medicinskaya radiologiya i radiacionnaya bezopasnost'. 2015;60(6):20-26. [Belykh LN, Biryukov AP, Vasilyev EV, Nevzorov VP. Estimates of lifetime radiogenic risk of cancer mortality and morbidity. Medical radiology and radiation safety. 2015;60(6):20-6 (In Russ.)].
12. Vasil'ev EV. Teoreticheskie voprosy ocenki pozhiznennogo riska smerti pri tehnogennom obluchenii (v poryadke obsuzhdeniya). URL: https://lrformula.ru/Content/Papers/TheGeneralFormulaLR.pdf (data obrascheniya: 15.01.2020). Tekst: elektronnyy. [Vasilyev EV. Theoretical issues of assessing the lifetime risk of death from technogenic radiation (in order of discussion). URL: https://lrformula.ru/Content/Papers/TheGeneralFormulaLR.pdf (date of request: 15.01.2020). Text: electronic. (In Russ.)].
13. Heligman L, Pollard JH. The age pattern of mortality. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries. 1980;107:49-80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020268100040257.
14. Tablica smertnosti naseleniya Rossii dlya kalendarnogo goda 2010. http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/rus_lt.php?year=52 [Table of mortality of the Russian population for the calendar year 2010. http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/rus_lt.php?year=52 (In Russ.)].
15. Vasil'ev EV. Funkciya riska smerti ot (lyuboy) vseh prichin. URL: https://lrformula.ru/Content/Papers/RiskDeathAllCauses.pdf (data obrascheniya: 15.01.2020). Tekst: elektronnyy. [Vasilyev EV., Function of the risk of death from (any) all causes. URL: https://lrformula.ru/Content/Papers/RiskDeathAllCauses.pdf (date of request: 15.01.2020). Text: electronic. (In Russ.)].
16. Vasil'ev EV. Matematicheskie modeli fonovogo riska smerti ot solidnyh rakov i leykemii. URL: https://lrformula.ru/Content/Papers/BaselineCancerRisk.pdf (data obrascheniya: 15.01.2020). Tekst: elektronnyy. [Vasilyev E V., Mathematical models of the stock risk of death from solid cancers and leukemia. URL: https://lrformula.ru/Content/Papers/BaselineCancerRisk.pdf (date of request: 15.01.2020). Text: electronic. (In Russ.)].
17. Statisticheskiy sbornik. Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2012 godu (zabolevaemost' i smertnost'). Pod redakciey Kaprina AD, Ctarinskogo VV, Petrovoy GV. Moskva 2014. [Statistical collection. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2012 (morbidity and mortality) Edited by Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Petrova GV. Moscow 2014. (in Russ.)].
18. Harding C, Pompei F, Wilson R. Peak and decline in cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence at old ages. Cancer. 2012;118(5):1371-86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26376.
19. Walsh L, Zhang W, et al. Framework for Estimating Radiation-Related Cancer Risks in Japan from the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Radiation Research. 2014;182(5):556-72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1667/RR13779.1.
20. Tukov AR, Biryukov AP, Shafranskiy IL. Uchet dopolnitel'nyh komponent doz oblucheniya pri radiacionno-epidemiologicheskih issledovaniyah lic, podvergshihsya vozdeystviyu ioniziruyuschey radiacii. Medicinskaya radiologiya i radiacionnaya bezopasnost'. 2014;59(1):43-49. [Tukov AR, Biryukov AP, Shafransky IL. Accounting for additional components of radiation doses in radiation-epidemiological studies of persons exposed to ionizing radiation. Medical radiology and radiation safety. 2014;59(1):43-9 (In Russ.)].
