employee
Barnaul, Russian Federation
employee
Barnaul, Russian Federation
The research objective was to find the optimal ratio of private and public principles in the regulation of physical culture and sports relations. The authors used the method of induction to analyze the general approaches to the essence of private and public principles in the modern theory of law. At the present stage, their optimal balance is necessary. The systemic-structural method made it possible to present private and public aspects through their specific manifestations, i.e. institutions of responsibility, control, and partnership. The methods of critical analysis were used to question some of the official positions regarding the institution of public and private partnership and the strengthening of criminal liability. The comparative legal method demonstrated the similarities between the ongoing processes in the sports law abroad and in Russia. The public principles in the regulation of sports relations need to be expanded by expanding the scope of social functions of the state. Some specific cases provided a positive assessment of the increase in the private law mechanisms in terms of the relative autonomy of various sports and the development of the institution of public and private partnership. An appropriate legislative framework would guarantee the rights and legitimate interests of private investors and help the state to achieve socially significant goals. The research results can expand the scientific understanding of sports law and serve as material for lawmaking. Thus, the balance of private and public principles in the regulation of physical culture and sports relations is in the shift of the role of the state from control towards the expansion of obligations to implement its social function. However, the expanding scope of private methods, which is natural for this stage, requires restrictions.
physical culture, sports, public law regulation, private law regulation, public and private partnership
1. Alekseev S. S. Right. ABC. Theory. Philosophy: the experience of integrated research. Moscow: Statut, 1999, 712. (In Russ.)
2. General theory of state and law. Academic course. Vol. 2. Theory of law, ed. Marchenko M. N. Moscow: Zertsalo, 1998, 656. (In Russ.)
3. Grebnev R. D. Constitutional right to sport: a comparative legal study. Cand. Jurispr. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 2012, 27. (In Russ.)
4. Zhabin N. A. Development of the regulatory framework of the Russian Federation in the field of physical culture and sports management. Administrative law and Procedure, 2011, (8): 47-50. (In Russ.)
5. Yakubov Yu. D. Role of the state in development of sports system of modern Russia. Vestnik Chuvashskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. I. Ya. Yakovleva, 2013, (4-1): 193-201. (In Russ.)
6. Peshin N. L., Bomanovskij B. Legal problems and peculiarities of state regulation of sport in Russia and Poland. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2012, (11): 35-44. (In Russ.)
7. Iglin A. V. Problems of corporate sports legal relations. Iurist, 2015, (9): 13-16. (In Russ.)
8. Kovalenko E. Y., Tydykova N. V. The history of the development of legislation on physical culture and sports in Russia. Russian-Asian Law Journal, 2021, (1): 14-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14258/ralj(2021)1.4
9. Yakubov Yu. D. Cooperation federal, regional and international sport systems in the process of realization of athletic-sport politics. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik, 2015, (1): 155-158. (In Russ.)
10. Murzin D. V., Olhkovsky R. M. Legal aspects of regulation community services in the field of physical culture and mass sports. Rossiiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal, 2017, (6): 172-183. (In Russ.)
11. Alekseev S. V. International sports law: formation and development prospects. Sport: Economy, law, management, 2008, (3): 26-31. (In Russ.)
12. Yakubov Yu. D. The perfection of political and legal regulation of sports and physical culture sphere in the Russian Federation. Vlast, 2015, (2): 177-182. (In Russ.)
13. Baddeley M. The extraordinary autonomy of sports bodies under Swiss law: lessons to be drawn. The International Sports Law Journal, 2020, 20(1-2): 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-019-00163-6
14. Cisneros B. Challenging the call: Should sports governing bodies be subject to judicial review? The International Sports Law Journal, 2020, 20(1-2): 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-020-00165-9
15. Ioannidis G. Football intermediaries and self-regulation: the need for greater transparency through disciplinary law, sanctioning and qualifying criteria. The International Sports Law Journal, 2019, 19(3-4): 154-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-019-00159-2
16. Di Marco A. The internal governance of sporting organisations: international convergences on an idea of democracy. The International Sports Law Journal, 2019, 19(3-4): 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-019-00144-9
17. Saraev V. V. The need to strengthen public law impact in the field of physical culture and sports. Sport: Economy, law, management, 2011, (2): 10-13. (In Russ.)
18. Kruessmann T. Extending integrity to third parties: in search of a new model for anti-corruption in sports. The International Sports Law Journal, 2019, 18(3-4): 136-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-018-0137-8
19. Garcia-Garcia B., James M., Koller D., Lindholm J., Mavromati D., Parrish R., Rodenberg R. The impact of Covid-19 on sports: a mid-way assessment. The International Sports Law Journal, 2020, 20(3-4): 115-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-020-00174-8
20. Yakubov Yu. D. Forms and measures of realization of Russia's policy in the sphere of physical culture and sports. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Sociology. Politology, 2013, 13(3): 90-94. (In Russ.)
21. Babenko E. I., Starlychanova M. A. Prospects for the development of public-private partnership in the sports industry. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, 2019, (2): 25-28. (In Russ.)
22. Aldoshina E. A., Aldoshin A. V., Ivanina L. I. Mechanisms of development of state-private partnership in sports infrastructure. Scientific notes of Orel State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2015, (2): 245-250. (In Russ.)
23. Perkova E. Yu. The use of the mechanism of state-private partnership in the sports industry in Russia. Innov: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal, 2017, (3). Available at: https://www.innov.ru/science/economy/ispolzovanie-mekhanizma-gosudarstve/ (accessed: 07 Apr 2021). (In Russ.)
24. Larina O. I. Public-private partnership in the sphere of physical culture and sports. Upravlenie, 2018, (4): 21-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2018-4-21-28
25. Dolmatova T. V., Garkavenko V. A. The formation of the sports facilities on the principles of public-private partnership - a priority direction of development. Vestnik sportivnoy nauki, 2014, (6): 49-51. (In Russ.)
26. Kaisarova V. P., Zhbannikova A. V., Olkhovskiy R. M. Reinventing partnership: how to develop sport services in infrastructure projects at the university in Russia. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2016, (5): 143-155. (In Russ.)
27. Vulakh M. G. The role and limits of state regulation in the field of physical culture and sports. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V. N. Tatishcheva, 2009, (70): 74-80. (In Russ.)
28. Ishchenko S. A. Commercialization in the international sports movement. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V. N. Tatishcheva, 2010, (72): 111-118. (In Russ.)
29. Kovalenko E. Y., Tydykova N. V., Shavandina O. A. On observance of the rules of legislative technique when developing statutory acts of Altai Krai for physical training and sports. Legal Linguistics, 2020, (18): 8-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2020)1802
30. De Dycker S. Good governance in Sport: comparative law aspects. The International Sports Law Journal, 2019, 19(1-2): 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-019-00153-8
