Russian Federation
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
The article examines the mechanism of constructing political dispositions of modern Russian youth, the main element of which is Internet communications. In the information society, the former institutions of political socialization (school, universities, family) are pushed to the periphery, which forms multidirectional scenarios of political socialization. An empirical analysis of the influence of online consumption on the structural elements of the political culture of young people is carried out within the framework of a sociological study, basic discourses and possible trends in the development of political loyalties of modern Russian youth are revealed.
Internet communications, political culture, political dispositions, political consciousness, political awareness, online consumption, Internet space
1. Delli Carpini MX (2000) Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication 17(4): P.341-349.
2. Dalrymple, K. E., and Scheufele, D. A. (2007). Finally informing the electorate? How the Internet got people thinking about presidential politics in 2004. Harvard Int. J. Press Polit. 12, P.96-111.
3. Maklyuen, M. Ponimanie media (2011) / Per. s angl. V.G. Nikolvaeva; Zakl. st. M. Vavilova. - 3-e izd. - M., «Kuchkovo pole»,. - 464 s.
4. Dutton, WH, Blank, G (2013) Cultures of the internet: The internet in Britain. Oxford Internet Survey 2013 Report. Available at: http://oxis.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/ 43/2014/ 11/Ox IS-2013.pdf (accessed 26 June 2017).
5. Sm.: Kirik, T.A. Virtual'naya real'nost' i ee ontologicheskie prototipy: monografiya. - Kurgan: Izd-vo Kurganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007. - 133 s.
6. Ekström, M, Östman, J (2015) Information, interaction, and creative production: The effects of three forms of internet use on youth democratic engagement. Communication Research 42(6): 796-818
7. Shtiglic, S., i Dang-Syuan', L. (2013). Social'nye seti i politicheskaya kommunikaciya: struktura analitiki social'nyh setey. /Analiz social'nyh setey i dobycha poleznyh iskopaemyh, 3 (4), 1277-1291. /https://ru.abcdef.wiki/wiki/ Social_media_ and_political_ communication_ in_the_ United_ States.
8. Bond et al., 2012 A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization Robert M. Bond1, Christopher J. Fariss1, Jason J. Jones2, Adam D. I. Kramer3, Cameron Marlow3, Jaime E. Settle1, and James H. Fowler1,4 1Political Science Department, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA/ Nature. 2012 September 13; 489(7415): . doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421
9. Bennett, K. Maton, and L. Kervin, 2008. “The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence,” British Journal of Educational Technology, volume 39, number 5, pp. 775-786.
10. Kiousis & Dimitrova, 2006 Differential impact of Web site content: Exploring the influence of source (public relations versus news), modality, and participation on college students’ perceptions/ June 2006 Public Relations Review 32(2):177-179
