Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tula, Russian Federation
The proposed method is based on an expert assessment of the weights of the compared criteria using additive convolution. The research material allows us to carry out a numerical assessment of various projects with sufficient reliability, to build a scale of their priority. The main criteria for evaluating an investment project are proposed. An example of choosing an innovative project using an additive criterion is considered. An example of constructing a normalized matrix of pairwise comparison of criteria is shown. Conclusions are drawn on the rating scale of projects based on the selected criteria.
investment project, additive criterion, convolution, rating scale
1. Biryukov A.N. Mul'tiplikativno-additivnaya svertka chastnyh kriteriev-agregatov dlya ocenki effektivnosti raboty uchrezhdeniy zdravoohraneniya // Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. 2010. № 4 (24).
2. Garmash A.N. Ekonomiko-matematicheskie metody i prikladnye modeli: uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury / A.N. Garmash, I.V. Orlova, V.V. Fedoseev. M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurayt, 2019. 328 s.
3. Grishagin V.A. Analiz mnogokriterial'nyh zadach optimizacii metodom lineynoy svertki. Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodskiy gosuniversitet, 2021. 40 s.
4. Mikoni S.V. Teoriya i praktika racional'nogo vybora: Monografiya. M.: Marshrut, 2004. 463 s.
5. Nogin V.D. Lineynaya svertka kriteriev v mnogokriterial'noy optimizacii // Iskusstvennyy intellekt i prinyatie resheniy. 2014. № 4. S. 73-81
6. Nogin V.D. Prinyatie resheniy v mnogokriterial'noy srede: kolichestvennyy podhod. M.: FIZMATLIT, 2005. 176 s.
7. Petrovskiy A.B. Teoriya prinyatiya resheniy. M.: Izd. centr «Akademiya», 2009. 400 c.
8. Solov'ev V.I. Metody optimal'nyh resheniy. M.: Finansovyy universitet, 2012. 364 s.
9. Shtoyer R. Mnogokriterial'naya optimizaciya. M.: Radio i svyaz', 1992. 504 s.
