graduate student from 01.01.2020 until now
Yekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
VAC 5.2.3 Региональная и отраслевая экономика
UDK 33 Экономика. Экономические науки
GRNTI 06.00 ЭКОНОМИКА И ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ
GRNTI 06.35 Учетно-экономические науки
TBK 7752 Финансовый учет
This article discusses the possibilities of applying International Financial Reporting Standards for the public sector in Russian universities to increase accountability when making decisions on budget preparation. The introduction of International Financial Reporting Standards for the Public Sector (IPSAS) is an important step to optimize the preparation of budgets of higher education institutions. The purpose of the study is to disclose the substantive aspects of the implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards for the public sector to ensure accountability and transparency of the budgetary financial statements of universities. In the course of the research, such methods as induction, deduction, analysis and synthesis were used. The result of the study is expressed in the justification of the importance of preparing budgets for higher educational institutions of the Russian Federation in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards for the Public sector.
international Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS), university, budgeting, budget preparation
1. M. Legenkova, International Public Sector Accounting Standards Implementation in the Russian Federation, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 6, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Oct. 2016.
2. 2014 Handbook of International Public Sector Accounting Pronouncements, IFAC, Jun. 23, 2014. https://www.ifac.org/ipsasb/publications/2014-handbook-international-public-sector-accounting-pronouncements-2 (accessed Dec. 21, 2021).
3. Z. Minovski, J. Hughes, and A. Kocevski, Transitioning to accrual accounting in the public sector, Journal of Contemporary Economic and Business Issues, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 75-88, 2016.
4. The concept of reforming the budget process in the Russian Federation in 2004 - 2006 / ConsultantPlus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_88769/d811075220c84f699888e92be6e381be30164209/ (accessed Dec. 21, 2021).
5. National Audit Office of Finland, National Audit Office of Finland. https://www.vtv.fi/en/ (accessed Dec. 12, 2021).
6. OECD and J. R. C.-E. Commission, Present and future school costs and access, OECD, Paris, Jun. 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/5205c25b-en.
7. The Financial Statement Effects of Capitalizing - ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/749930439 (accessed Dec. 12, 2021).
8. OECD, OECD Journal on Budgeting, Volume 2021 Issue 1. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2021. Accessed: Dec. 12, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/oecd-journal-on-budgeting-volume-2021-issue-1_a4b2ab8d-en
9. Education resources - Public spending on education - OECD Data. https://data.oecd.org/eduresource/public-spending-on-education.htm (accessed Dec. 12, 2021).
10. Handbook for Decentralized Education Planning. Implementing National EFA Plans. 2005. Accessed: Dec. 12, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED494429
11. OECD, The Funding of School Education: Connecting Resources and Learning. OECD, 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264276147-en.
12. OECD Journal on Budgeting - OECD. https://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/oecd-journal-on-budgeting.htm (accessed Dec. 12, 2021).
13. I. V. Abankina, V. A. Vynaryk, and L. M. Filatova, The State Policy of Funding Higher Education Under Public Budget Constraints 1, Russian Education & Society, vol. 59, no. 3-4, pp. 135-173, Apr. 2017, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10609393.2017.1399755.
14. Volgograd State University, N. V. Filipenko, V. V. Poluboyarov, and Volgograd State University, IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FINANCIAL PLANNING SYSTEM USING THE INTRA-UNIVERSITY INFORMATION SUPPORT SYSTEM OF THE FINANCIAL PLANNING PROCESS, UMPA, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 58-67, 2017, doi:https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2017.06.075.
15. Federal law on amendments to certain legislative acts in connection with the improvement of the legal status of state institutions - Rossiyskaya Gazeta. https://rg.ru/2010/05/12/pravovoe-change-dok.html (accessed Dec. 21, 2021).
16. Volgograd State University, N. V. Filipenko, V. V. Poluboyarov, and Volgograd State University, IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FINANCIAL PLANNING SYSTEM USING THE INTRA-UNIVERSITY INFORMATION SUPPORT SYSTEM OF THE FINANCIAL PLANNING PROCESS, UMPA, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 58-67, 2017, doi:https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2017.06.075.
17. A. V. Glushchenko, E. M. Egorova, and T. A. Chekrygina, MODERN APPROACH TO STRUCTURING THE UNIVERSITY AND BUILDING MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING BY RESPONSIBILITY CENTERS, Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, no. 4 (45), Art. no. 4 (45), 2021.
18. T. Curristine, Government Performance: Lessons and Challenges, OECD Journal on Budgeting, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 127-151, Dec. 2005, doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v5-art6-en.
19. T. Curristine, Performance Information in the Budget Process: Results of the OECD 2005 Questionnaire, OECD Journal on Budgeting, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 87-131, 2003.
20. J. Kromann Kristensen, W. Groszyk, and B. Bühler, Outcome-focused Management and Budgeting, OECD Journal on Budgeting, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 7-34, May 2002, doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v1-art20-en.
21. The rôle of performance indicators in higher education | SpringerLink. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00129438 (accessed Dec. 12, 2021).
22. C. A. Pontoppidan, Public Sector Accounting and Auditing in Denmark, Public Sector Accounting and Auditing in Europe: The Challenge of Harmonization, pp. 42-49, 2015.
23. P. Ahonen and J. M. Koljonen, The contents of the National Audit Office of Finland performance audits, 2001-2016: An interpretive study with computational content analysis, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 49-66, 2020, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-11-2018-0138.
24. Reasons and obstacles to starting a business: Experience of students of Lithuanian higher education institutions. https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/183962 (accessed Dec. 12, 2021).
25. R. Boarini and H. Strauss, What is the private return to tertiary education?: New evidence from 21 OECD countries, OECD Journal: Economic Studies, vol. 2010, no. 1, pp. 1-25, 2010.
26. Y. V. Pereverzeva and A. N. Shamne, Financing higher education: experience of Russia and Germany, Nov. 2017, pp. 215-219. doi:https://doi.org/10.2991/cildiah-17.2017.38.
27. Federal Law ‘On Education in the Russian Federation’ of December 29, 2012 N 273-FZ (last edition) / ConsultantPlus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174/ (accessed Dec. 21, 2021).
28. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of August 5, 2013 No. 662 'On monitoring the education system.' http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/70329494/ (accessed Dec. 21, 2021).
29. Decree of the President on measures to implement state policy in the field of education and science - Rossiyskaya Gazeta. https://rg.ru/2012/05/09/nauka-dok.html (accessed Dec. 21, 2021).
30. Methodology for calculating indicators for monitoring the effectiveness of educational institutions of higher education in 2016 (based on the data of form No. 1-Monitoring for 2015) (approved by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation on March 21, 2016 No. AK-6/05vn). http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71273326/ (accessed Dec. 21, 2021).
