PROBLEMS OF APPLICATION OF RESPONSIBILITY MEASURES OF PARTIES FOR WRONG PERFORMANCE OF STATE AND MUNICIPAL CONTRACTS
Rubrics: POLITICS AND LAW
Authors:
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 125
to 133
Status:
Published
Received:
29.05.2015
Accepted:
29.05.2015
Published:
29.05.2015
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
state and municipal contracts, responsibility for non-performance of the contract, liquidated damages, postponement and cancellation penalties, pledge, bank insurance
Abstract (English):
In the article the author reveals the main problems of application practice of responsibility measures to the supplier (contractor) and to the customer for non-performance or wrong performance of any state or municipal contract. The author offers a variety of approaches to applying mechanisms of foreclosure penalties for state and municipal contracts, taking into account the stories of legislation on procurement made on the basis of the analysis of the judicial practice of arbitration courts in order to develop common approaches to judicial decisions.
In the article the author reveals the main problems of application practice of responsibility measures to the supplier (contractor) and to the customer for non-performance or wrong performance of any state or municipal contract. The author offers a variety of approaches to applying mechanisms of foreclosure penalties for state and municipal contracts, taking into account the stories of legislation on procurement made on the basis of the analysis of the judicial practice of arbitration courts in order to develop common approaches to judicial decisions.
Keywords:
state and municipal contracts, responsibility for non-performance of the contract, liquidated damages, postponement and cancellation penalties, pledge, bank insurance
state and municipal contracts, responsibility for non-performance of the contract, liquidated damages, postponement and cancellation penalties, pledge, bank insurance
1. Bogdanov D.E. Imperativnaya otvetstvennost´ v dogovornykh otnosheniyakh s pozitsiy spravedlivosti. Zakono-datel´stvo i ekonomika. -2013.-№ 3. - S. 27-35.
2. Chvanenko D.A. K voprosu ob otvetstvennosti za narushenie usloviy gosudarstvennogo (munitsipal´nogo) kontrakta. Konkurentnoe pravo. - 2013. - № 2. - S. 25-28.
3. Windscheid B. Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts II. § 285. Tsit. po: Pergament M. Ya. Dogovornaya neustoyka i interes (chast´ pervaya). Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava.- 2012.- № 1.- S. 154.
