Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
In the XXI century, network communication generates its own philosophical discourse of thinking. However, network discourse and network interaction appeared at the dawn of axial time, first, in the Eastern philosophy and, eventually, in the Western one. The authors used the information and communication approach, as well as the historical method, to trace the network discourse from traditional Chinese philosophy all the way through Leibnizianism and classical German philosophy. The research also covered the manifestations of triadic network thinking in the Western philosophy of the XX century, including the Russian philosophy of the new and modern history. It featured the Taoist and Confucian categories of trace, void, and dynamic stability, which were rediscovered by Postmodernism. When the network discourse took over the linear one, it opened up prospects for new, digital thinking. The obtained data develop the ontological aspects of network existence and facilitate the applied studies of network communications.

Keywords:
network, network communications, Taoism, Confucianism, postmodernism, Leibniz, Hegel, Darrida
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Berdnikova A. Yu. ‘Back to Kant' or "back to Leibnitz"? A critical view from the history of Russian metaphysical personalism. Kantian Journal, 2017, 36(2): 33-45. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.25236/iceesr.2020.140

2. Bresler M. G. Ontology of network being. Ufa: USPTU, 2020, 110. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/kgjebq

3. Bresler M. G. Theses of network logic. Analytical philosophy: trajectories of history and vectors of development: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Novosibirsk, 25-26 Feb 2022. Novosibirsk: Ofset, 2022, 9-16. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2022.1.2

4. Bubnova I. A., Wang Yu. Confucianism in the Rusian language consciousness. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2011, (14): 120-127. (In Russ.)] https://www.elibrary.ru/pxpekh

5. Hegel G. W. F. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. Moscow: Mysl, 1977, vol. 2, 573. (In Russ.)]

6. Herder J. G. Ideas on the Philosophy of the History of Mankind. 2nd ed. Moscow: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives, 2013, 760. (In Russ.)]

7. Hippocrates. Works in 3 volumes. Moscow: T8, 2015, vol. 1, 740. (In Russ.)]

8. Davydov D. A. And the internet said, let us make netocracy in our image, after our likeness. A critical view on the concept of post-capitalism by A. Bard and J. Söderqvist. Discourse-P, 2022, 19(4): 66-81. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.17506/18179568_2022_19_4_66

9. Deleuze G. The Logic of Sense. Moscow: Akad. Proekt, 2011, 472. (In Russ.)]

10. Deleuze G., Guattari P.-F. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya; Moscow: Astrel, 2010, 560. (In Russ.)]

11. Demichev I. V. The problem of stability of social systems. Ufa: Bashk. entsikl., 2017, 136. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/xqkyfn

12. Derrida J. Of grammatology. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 2000, 512. (In Russ.)]

13. Karsavin L. P. Philosophy of history. Moscow: AST; Neoclassic, 2007, 350. (In Russ.)]

14. Kokovkina A. A. Axiology voids in European and Eastern traditions. Vestnik Dalnevostochnoi gosudarstvennoi sotsialno-gumanitarnoi akademii, 2011, (1-1): 53-62. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/pdebdx

15. Kolesova L. A. Golden Utopia. Moscow, 2013, 571. (In Russ.)]

16. Kruglov V. V. Ontological-dynamic concepts of the I Ching tradition and the model of their linguocultural analysis. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 2021, 13(2): 252-266. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2021.208

17. Lavier J.-A. Chinese bioenergy. St. Petersburg: Severo-Zapad, 2022, 278. (In Russ.)]

18. Lao Tzu. Tao Te Ching - The Way of Life. Moscow: AST, 2018, 256. (In Russ.)]

19. Leibniz G. V. Letters and essays on Chinese philosophy and the binary system. Moscow: RAS Institute of Philosophy, 2005, 403. (In Russ.)]

20. Maslova A. V. The comprehension of Chinese philosophy by Russian thinkers of the XVIII, XIX AND XX centuries. Discourse-P, 2020, 7(4): 98-111. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.24411/1817-9568-2020-10407

21. Melnikov V. A., Ilyamova D. A. Leonardo da Vinci. "The Arno Valley Landscape". Ufa, 2017, 92. (In Russ.)]

22. Rodicheva I. S. The Chuang Tzu’s philosophy of "emptiness". Scientific Notes of Taurida National V. І. Vernadsky University. Series: Philosophy. Culturology. Political sciences. Sociology, 2012, 24(4): 36-41. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/umnlzn

23. Solovev V. S. Philosophical principles of integral knowledge. In: Solovev V. S. Works. Moscow: Mysl, 1988, vol. 2, 140-288. (In Russ.)]

24. Hui Yu. Recursivity and Contingency. Moscow: V-A-C Press, 2020, 398. (In Russ.)]

25. Chuang Tzŭ. St. Petersburg: Azbuka, 2022, 480. (In Russ.)]

26. Schelling F. W. J. Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1998, 518. (In Russ.)]

27. Schelling F. W. J. On the World Soul. An Hypothesis of Higher Physics for Explaining Universal Organism. Moscow: Mysl, vol. 2, 1987, 637. (In Russ.)]

28. Berahmand K., Nasiri E., Forouzandeh S., Li Y. A preference random walk algorithm for link prediction through mutual influence nodes in complex networks. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 2022, 34(8): 5375-5387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.05.006

29. Cardoso Jr. H. R. Peirce and Deleuze in the ‘Protoplasm of Philosophy’: triadic relations and habit as pragmatic concepts. Review of Contemporary Philosophy, 2018, (18): 23-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.22381/RCP1820192

30. Fisch M., Turquette A. Peirce’s triadic logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 1966, 2(2): 71-85.

31. Hassan K., Islam L., Haque S. A. Degree distribution, rank-size distribution, and leadership persistence in mediation-driven attachment networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2017, 469: 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.001

32. Kanazawa Y. Monadic emotions, dyadic emotions, triadic emotions: the 1-2-3 emotion model (peircean kainopythagorean PHANEROSCOPIC model of emotion) and the fundamental questions to the emotion-involved processing hypothesis. Advance. Preprint. 2022. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.20486262.v1

33. Li L. The deconstructionism of Chuang-Tzu and Derrida: a comparison. WOP in Education, Social Sciences and Psychology, 2020, 62: 698-701. https://doi.org/10.25236/iceesr.2020.140

34. Li L. The diversity of confucianism in the Southern Song dynasty: a comparative study of Zhu Xi's and Zhang Shi's views on Taiji and human nature. Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies, 2022; 22(1): 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1215/15982661-9767222

35. Liu Y., Dehmamy N., Barabási A.-L. Isotopy and energy of physical networks. Nature Physics, 2021, 2(17): 216-222. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-1029-z

36. Needam J. Science and civilization in China. Vol. 2. History of Scientific Though. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, 722.

37. Odland B. C. Peirce's triadic logic: modality and continuity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 2021, 57(2): 149-171.

38. Qin Z., Wang S. W. Zhou Dunyi’s of Taiji in the Taiji Tushuo. Prajñā Vihāra: Journal of Philosophy and Religion, 2019, 20(2): 70-93.

39. Siew C. S. Q., Vitevitch M. S. Investigating the influence of inverse preferential attachment on network development. Entropy, 2020, 22(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/e22091029

40. Voorveld H. A. M. Brand communication in social media: a research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 2019, 48(1): 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1588808


Login or Create
* Forgot password?