from 01.01.2021 to 01.01.2021
Russian Federation
The article is devoted to objective and subjective signs of theft. As objective signs of theft, the seizure and (or) appeal in favor of the guilty or third parties, the illegality and gratuitousness of the act, causing damage to the owner or another owner are considered, and as a subjective sign - the selfish purpose of the guilty. Special attention is paid to the problems that arise during the qualification of theft, robbery, robbery, fraud, embezzlement and embezzlement of other people's property.
property, theft, responsibility, law, theft, act, robbery, robbery, damage
1. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii: Zakon Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 13.06.1996 №63-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii. 1996. №25. St. 2954.
2. Ahmedov R.U. Imuschestvo kak ocenochnyy priznak predmeta hischeniya // Obschestvo i pravo. 2013. №2 (39). S.125-131.
3. Anistratenko A.V. Ponyatie hischeniya po Ugolovnomu pravu Rossii // Vestnik VUiT. 2014. №73. S.71-83.
4. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 25.04.1995 № 5 (red. ot 27.12.2002) «O nekotoryh voprosah primeneniya sudami zakonodatel'stva ob otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1995. № 104.
5. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 27.12.2002 № 29 (red. ot 24.05.2016) «O sudebnoy praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboe» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2003. № 9.
6. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 27.12.2007 № 51 «O sudebnoy praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate»// Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2008. № 4.
7. Shesler A.V. Hischeniya: ponyatiya i priznaki // Vestn. Tom. gos. un-ta. Pravo. 2013. №4 (6). S.70-80.
8. Boycov A.I. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti. // SPb.: Yuridicheskiy centr Press. 2002. s. 800.
9. Hilyuta V.V. Suschnost' bezvozmezdnogo hischeniya // Biznes v zakone. 2013. №1. S.133-136.
10. Bratanov V. V. Ponyatie hischeniya // Biznes v zakone. 2014. №2. S.82-88.
11. Karavaeva A.V. Razgranichenie moshennichestva i inyh sostavov // Nauka i sovremennost'. 2014. № 31. S. 234-237.
12. Avtandilova I.O. Otlichie moshennichestva ot smezhnyh prestupleniy: problemy kvalifikacii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2013. №2. S.221-223.
13. Krasnoperov E.V. Nekotorye problemy kvalifikacii prestupleniy, sovershaemyh putem zloupotrebleniya doveriem // Obschestvo i pravo. 2013. №4 (46). S.89-91.
14. Savenko I.A. Problemy sudebnoy praktiki po delam o krazhah iz odezhdy, sumki ili drugoy ruchnoy kladi, nahodivshihsya pri poterpevshem // Vestnik KRU MVD Rossii. 2015. №3 (29). S.34-35.
