The Sociohumanitarian Vector of the Development of the Russian Socioeconomic System

Vladimir Golubyev; Pol V. Savchenko; Mariya Fyedorova

doi:10.12737/7405

THE SOCIOHUMANITARIAN VECTOR OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN SOCIOECONOMIC SYSTEM The Sociohumanitarian Vector of the Development of the Russian Socioeconomic System

АА Аа

Published in Level of Life of the Population of Regions of Russia · Pages 92–102 · Rubric: Social inequality

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/7405

Received: 29.12.2014 Accepted: 28.01.2015 Published: 28.01.2015 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Vladimir Golubyev

Pol V. Savchenko

Mariya Fyedorova

Vladimir Golubyev

Pol V. Savchenko

Academic degree: doctor of economic sciences

FGBUN Institut ekonomiki RAN Glavnyy nauchnyy sotrudnik · Russian Federation

Mariya Fyedorova

Academic degree: doctor of economic sciences

Institut ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk Veduschiy nauchnyy sotrudnik · Russian Federation

ABSTRACT

Object. The role of the human as an economic and social actor in the sociohumanitarian development is considered. The Subject of the Analysis. The trends of changes in the Russian socioeconomic system and its subsystems are analyzed: economic, political, social, moral, home and family — for the purpose of the presence of basic problems and contradictions of socio-humanitarian development. The Main Aspects of the Article. The authors proceed from the fact that socio-humanism is based on the harmonious synthesis in the system nature-man-society. The human as an economic and social actor possesses vital, intellectual and moral capital is affected by the vertical and horizontal relations of socioeconomic system and at the same time formes them in his (her) own image. The contradictions are resolved by the generation of «new», that are the harmonic synthesis of the resolving oppositions. The sociohumanitarian state is a natural stage in the sequence: liberal — social — sociohumanitarian. Purpose of the Article. The existing trends of economic and sociohumanitarian development of Russia are completely contradictory. Some of them corresponds to the socio-humanitarian vector of the development, whereas others not. The system reforms are to be carried out. Under the conditions of globalization the main thing is to win competition for the human. In Russia it is necessary to improve institutions and infrastructure of the human development that include the motivation to the creation of innovations for the realization of creative and owner’s abilities, social elevators for promoting of the creative persons and groups.

KEYWORDS

socioeconomic system, sociohumanism, a sociohumanitarian state, the human as an economic and social actor, vital capital, intellectual capital, moral capital.

Text

1. Концепция социогуманизма

Cоциогуманизм — это естественно-гуманитарное учение о функционировании и развитии глобальной системы природа–человек–общество и локальных подсистем. Социогуманизм выступает как обобщенный итог исторического пути, на котором неизменно росла ценность человека, совершенствовалось бытие [Бушуев, Голубев, Коробейников, 2013, 19, с. 43–52].

Учение социогуманизма, в отличие от большинства социальных теорий, строится дедуктивным методом — от теории социоприродного развития к социуму и человеку. Тем самым оно лишено недостатков обычно используемых индуктивных построений (субъективизм, неучет существенных факторов, преувеличение или преуменьшение роли других и т.п.). Три главные составляющие этого учения: от общества потребления — к обществу социального гуманизма, от «человека социального» — к «человеку социально-духовному», от социального — к социогуманитарному государству [Бобков, 2013, 22, с. 6–8].

При социогуманизме разрешаются (частично или полностью) на основе гармоничного синтеза основные противоположности в системе природа–человек–общество [Голубев, Кураков, Тимирясова, 2013, 1, с. 110].

1. Golubev V.S., Kurakov A.L., Timiryasova A.V. Chelovekovedenie [Humanities]. Moscow-Kazan’, Poznanie Publ., 2013.

2. Golubev V.S. Vvedenie v sinteticheskuyu evolyutsionnuyu ekologiyu [Golubev Introduction to synthetic evolutionary ecology]. Moscow, Papirus Pro Publ., 2001.

3. Krizis 2010-kh godov i novaya energeticheskaya tsivilizatsiya [The crisis of the 2010s and a new energy civilization]. Moscow, Energiya Publ., 2013.

4. Grinberg R.S., Rubinshteyn A.Ya. Individuum i gosudarstvo: ekonomicheskaya dilemma [The individual and the state: economic dilemma]. Moscow, Ves’ mir Publ., 2013.

5. Khodzhson Dzh. Instituty i individy: vzaimodeystvie i evolyutsiya [The institutions and individuals: cooperation and evolution]. Voprosy ekonomiki []. 2008, I. 8.

6. Avaialable at: www:// gtmarket.ru/news/2013.

7. Sotsial’noe polozhenie i uroven’ zhizni naseleniya Rossii. 2013 [Social status and standard of living of the population of Russia]. Moscow, Rosstat Publ., 2013.

8. Larionov A., Larionova Yu. Rol’ i mesto ponyatiynokategorial’nogo apparata v realizatsii natsional’nogo proekta «Dostupnoe i komfortnoe zhil’e - grazhdanam Rossii» [Role of conceptual and categorical apparatus in the national project “Affordable and Comfortable Housing - to Russian citizens”]. Vestnik IE RAN [Bulletin of RAS]. 2014, I. 1.

9. Kozlov P. Narodnyy front ne ustraivaet ispolnenie mayskikh ukazov [People’s Front are not satisfied with the execution of the May decrees]. Izvestiya [News], 04.07.2014, pp. 1-2.

10. Integral’nyy pokazatel’, osnovannyy na rezul’tatakh sotsiologicheskikh obsledovaniy predprinimateley i ekspertnykh otsenkakh o chastote i razmerakh vzyatok. Raschet etogo pokazatelya osushchestvlyaet nepravitel’stvennaya mezhdunarodnaya organizatsiya Transparency International [Integral indicator, based on the results of sociological surveys of entrepreneurs and expert assessments on the frequency and size of bribes. The calculation of this indicator is a nongovernmental international organization Transparency International.]. 11. Senchagov V., Gubin B., Karavaeva I., Ivanov E. Federal’nyy byudzhet 2014-2016 - byudzhet tormozheniya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [2014-2016 federal budget - the budget deceleration of economic development]. Vestnik IE RAN [Herald of RAS]. 2014, I. 1.

11.

12. Savel’ev O. Yanvarskie reytingi odobreniya i doveriya [The January approval ratings and trust]. Moskovskaya Pravda [Moskovskaya Pravda]. 12.02.2014, p. 2.

13. Edovina T. Rossiyu prodvinuli po chasti biznesa [Russia advanced on the part of businesses]. Kommersant” [Kommersant]. 2014. 23.01, p. 2.

14. Vaslavskaya I. Indikatory nadezhnosti zashchity prav sobstvennosti [Indicators reliability of property rights protection]. Vestnik IE RAN [Bulletin of RAS]. 2012, I. 6.

15. Yanzhul I.I. Ekonomicheskoe znachenie chestnosti (Zabytyy faktor proizvodstva) [The economic importance of honesty (Forgotten factor of production)]. Moscow, 1912.

16. D’yachkova S. Sotsial’naya otvetstvennost’ kak natsional’naya dukhovnaya traditsiya rossiyskogo predprinimatel’stva [Social Responsibility as a national spiritual tradition of Russian entrepreneurship]. Vestnik IE RAN [Bulletin RAS]. 2012, I. 6.

17. Available at: www.mkrf.ru.

18. Kapelyushnikov R. Skol’ko stoit chelovecheskiy kapital Rossii? [How much does Russia human capital?]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Problems of Economics]. 2013, I. 2.

19. Bushuev V.V., Golubev V.S., Korobeynikov A.A. Noosferizm, ustoychivoe razvitie, nravstvennoe gosudarstvo, sotsiogumanizm: obshchee i osobennoe [Noosferizm, sustainable development, moral state, sotsiogumanizm: general and special]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 3 (181), pp. 43-52.

20. Subetto A.I., Bobkov V.N., Onoprienko V.I. Klassifikatsiya kontseptual’nykh nauchnykh shkol noosferizma [Classification of conceptual scientific schools noosferizma]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 3 (181), pp. 72-75.

21. Bobkov V.N., Subetto A.I. Deklaratsiya Kruglogo stola «Noosfernaya paradigma global’nogo razvitiya obshchestva» [Declaration of the Round Table “Noospheric paradigm of global development of society”]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 6 (184), pp. 3-8.

22. Bobkov V.N. Obshchestvo kollektivnogo vzaimodeystviya [Society of collective interaction]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii []. 2013, I. 8 (186), pp. 6-8.

23. Subetto A.I. Metodologicheskie osnovaniya noosfernoorientirovannogo sinteza nauk v XXI veke. Nauchnyy doklad, predstavlennyy na zasedanii Moskovskogo otdeleniya Noosfernoy obshchestvennoy akademii nauk 15 maya 2013 goda. Moskva, VTsUZh [Methodological grounds noosferno-oriented synthesis of Sciences in the XXI century / scientific papers presented at a meeting of the Moscow branch of the Noosphere Public Academy of Sciences May 15, 2013. Moscow, VTSUZH]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 8 (186), pp. 9-29.

24. Bobkov V.N., Bobkov N.V. Sovremennoe razvitie idey V.I. Vernadskogo o noosfere: novye protsessy i struktury [Modern development of ideas VI Vernadsky’s noosphere, new processes and structures]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 8 (186), pp. 30-33.

25. Adamov A.K. Organizatsiya dukhovnoy i ekonomicheskoy deyatel’nosti na printsipakh noosfernoy demokratii [The organization of the spiritual and economic activities on the principles of democracy noosphere]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 8 (186), pp. 34-40.

26. Golubev V.S. Global’nyy Proekt sotsiogumanitarnogo razvitiya: ot obshchestva potrebleniya - k obshchestvu sotsial’nogo gumanizma, ot sotsial’nogo k sotsiogumanitarnomu gosudarstvu, ot «cheloveka sotsial’nogo» - k «cheloveku sotsial’no-dukhovnomu» [Global Project sociohumanitarian development: from the consumer society - a society of social humanism, from the social to the sociohumanitarian state of “social man” - to the “man of social and spiritual”]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 8 (186), pp. 41-43.

27. Golubev E.A. Nuzhna li chelovechestvu noosfera? [Do mankind noosphere?]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 10 (188), pp. 92-99.

28. Gordina L.S. NOO-Konstitutsiya kak garant preodoleniya khrematicheskogo soznaniya [Noo-Constitution as a guarantee of overcoming hrematicheskogo consciousnes]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 8 (186), pp. 44-51.

29. Grigor’ev S.I. Vitalistskaya sotsiologiya bydloizatsii - osnova nauchnogo obespecheniya preodoleniya krizisnogo razvitiya sovremennogo rossiyskogo obshchestva [Vitalist sociology bydloizatsii - the basis of scientific support to overcome the crisis of modern Russian society]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 8 (186), pp. 52-57.

30. Ursul A.D. V.I. Vernadskiy i noosfernye perspektivy global’nogo napravleniya nauki [Vernadsky noosphere and the outlook for global field of science]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 8 (186), pp. 62-74.

31. Vasilenko V.N. Imperativy vernadskianskoy revolyutsii: noosfernyy vektor razvitiya Rossii i global’nogo obshchestva [Imperatives vernadskianskoy revolution noosphere vector of Russian and global society]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 12 (190), pp. 82-92.

32. Pyurveev D.B. Uchenie V.I. Vernadskogo o noosfere i model’ kosmo-planetarnoy integratsii planet [Vernadsky’s noosphere and model cosmo-planetary integration planet]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2013, I. 12 (190), pp. 93-110.

JATS XML

Editor-in-Chief, editorial board chair

GOST

Golubyev V., Savchenko P. V., Fyedorova M. The Sociohumanitarian Vector of the Development of the Russian Socioeconomic System // Level of Life of the Population of Regions of Russia. 2014. no. 4. pp. 92-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/7405. (Date of access 14.09.2026).

MLA

Vladimir Golubyev, Savchenko P. V., Fyedorova M.. "The Sociohumanitarian Vector of the Development of the Russian Socioeconomic System." Level of Life of the Population of Regions of Russia 2.4 (2014): 92-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/7405.

APA

Golubyev V., Savchenko P. V., Fyedorova M. (2014). The Sociohumanitarian Vector of the Development of the Russian Socioeconomic System. Level of Life of the Population of Regions of Russia, 2(4), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.12737/7405

Chicago

Vladimir Golubyev, Savchenko P. V., Fyedorova M.. "The Sociohumanitarian Vector of the Development of the Russian Socioeconomic System." Level of Life of the Population of Regions of Russia 2, no. 4 (2014): 92-102. https://doi.org/10.12737/7405.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Golubyev V., Savchenko P. V., Fyedorova M. | title = The Sociohumanitarian Vector of the Development of the Russian Socioeconomic System | journal = Level of Life of the Population of Regions of Russia | year = 2014 | volume = 2 | issue = 4 | pages = 92-102 | doi = 10.12737/7405 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

THE SOCIOHUMANITARIAN VECTOR OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN SOCIOECONOMIC SYSTEM The Sociohumanitarian Vector of the Development of the Russian Socioeconomic System

1. Концепция социогуманизма

Confirmation