PLACE OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF THE ORGANIZATION

G. Eremina; O. Sobol

doi:10.12737/25270

UDC

PLACE OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF THE ORGANIZATION

Published in Management of the Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia · Pages 29–32 · Rubric: Stimulation and motivation: effective technologies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/25270

Received: 05.05.1905 Accepted: 05.05.1905 Published: 05.05.1905 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

G. Eremina

O. Sobol

G. Eremina

Academic degree: candidate of economic sciences

FGBU «Vserossiyskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut truda» Ministerstva truda i social'noy zaschity RF Competitor of a Scientific Degree of Candidate of Economic Sciences · Russian Federation · Moscow

O. Sobol

Academic degree: candidate of economic sciences

ABSTRACT

The article analyzes the existing western approaches to the evaluation of performance indicators, which are now actively used in Russia: Management by Objectives, Balanced Scorecard, a system for assessing key performance indicators, etc. The work of domestic authors is also considered, dedicated to measuring financial performance and evaluation of staff. The article deals with the main concepts related to measuring performance: «key performance indicators» (KPIs), «key results indicators» (KRIs) and etc. The research showed that in most cases companies use existing methods to measure their performance, aimed at assessing financial indicators or qualifications, knowledge, skills of employees. In turn, the methods of measuring effectiveness and effectiveness, which allow to reflect the level of achievement of the set goals, the degree of effectiveness of the activities of personnel and the organization as a whole, provide feedback to employees on key areas of their actions are in demand less. The article also provides the basic rules for the application of the performance measurement system, which makes it possible to improve the efficiency of its application.

KEYWORDS

management of organizations, performance measurement activities, key performance indicators, human resource management, assessment.

Text

Современные тренды в области менеджмента таковы, что особенно актуальными становятся новые подходы к оценке результативности и эффективности работы компании в целом и ее основного ресурса — персонала. Процесс измерения
результативности начинает занимать ключевое место в управление организацией.

1. Kaplan Robert S., Norton David P. Moscow, Olimp-Biznes Publ., 2003, 304 p. (In Russian)

2. Klochkov A. KPI i motivatsiya personala [KPI and staff motivation]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2010. 170 p.(In Russian)

3. Fedoseev A., Karabanov B. Bitva za effektivnost’ [The battle for effectiveness]. Moscow, Alpina Publ., 201305 p.(In Russian)

4. Eremina G.A. Dinamika razvitiya sbalansirovannoy sistemy pokazateley [Dynamics of the development of a balanced system of indicators]. Byulleten’ nauki i praktiki [Bulletin of Science and Practice]. 2016, I. 12 (13), pp. 305-310. Available at: http://www.bulletennauki.com/eremina (accessed 15 December 2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.205441; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XEHMUN

5. Balabanov I.T. Osnovy finansovogo menedzhmenta [Fundamentals of Financial Management]. Moscow, Finance and Statistics Publ., 2010, 512 p.(In Russian)

6. Efimova O.V. Finansovyy analiz: sovremennyy instrumentariy dlya prinyatiya ekonomicheskikh resheniy [Financial analysis: modern tools for economic decision making]. Moscow, Omega-M Publ., 2010. 351 p.(In Russian) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MWJQHX

7. Kovalev V.V. Finansovyy menedzhment: teoriya i praktika [Financial management: theory and practice]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2014. 1104 p.(In Russian) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SXUDKF

8. Savitskaya G.V. Analiz khozyaystvennoy deyatel’nosti predpriyatiya [Analysis of the economic activity of the enterprise]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 200512 p.(In Russian)

9. Sheremet A.D., Negashev E.V. Metodika finansovogo analiza deyatel’nosti kommercheskikh organizatsiy [Methods of financial analysis of commercial organizations]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2013. 208 p. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SODJAZ

10. Bazarov T.Yu., Bekov H.A., Aksenova E.A. Metody otsenki upravlencheskogo personala gosudarstvennykh i kommercheskikh struktur [Methods for assessing the management of government and commercial structures]. Moscow, Intel-Sintez Business School Publ., 2000. 321 p.

11. Vesnin V.R. Prakticheskiy menedzhment personala [Practical personnel management]. Moscow, Jurist Publ., 1998. (In Russian).

12. Dyatlov V.A., Kibanov A.Ya., Odegov Yu.G., Pihalo V.T. Upravlenie personalom [Personnel Management]. Moscow, Academy Publ., 2000. (In Russian).

13. Kibanov A.Ya., Durakova I.B. Upravlenie personalom organizatsii: otbor i otsenka pri nayme, attestatsiya [Personnel management of the organization: selection and evaluation in hiring, certification]. Moscow, Exam Publ., 2004. 416 p. (In Russian) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OYZZJQ

14. Magura M.I., Kurbatova M. Otsenka raboty personala [Evaluation of the work of staff]. Moscow, Business School Intel- Sintez Publ., 2001 (In Russian).

15. Federal’nyy zakon ot 3 dekabrya 2012 g. N 236-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Trudovoy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i stat’yu 1 Federal’nogo zakona «O tekhnicheskom regulirovanii» [Federal Law of December 3, 2012 N 236-FZ «On Amendments to the Labor Code of the Russian Federation and Article 1 of the Federal Law» On Technical Regulation «]. (In Russian)

16. Eremin G.A. Klyuchevye pokazateli effektivnosti kak instrument upravleniya organizatsiey [Key performance indicators as a tool for managing the organization]. Internet-zhurnal «NAUKOVEDENIE» [Internet-journal «NAUKOVENIE»]. V. 7, I. 5 (2015). Available at: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/126EVN515. pdf. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15862/126EVN515; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TFWNSN

17. Eremin G.A. Izmerenie pokazateley effektivnosti kak biznesprotsess organizatsii [Measurement of performance indicators as a business process of organization]. Al’manakh mirovoy nauki [Almanac of world science]. 2015, I. 2-4 (2), 2015. Moscow, Ar-Consult Publ., 167 pp. (In Russian)

JATS XML

Otvetstvennyy sekretar'

Anastasia Lobacheva

aslobacheva@mail.ru

GOST

Eremina G. A., Sobol O. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF THE ORGANIZATION // Management of the Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia. 2017. no. 2. pp. 29-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/25270. (Date of access 16.09.2026).

MLA

G. Eremina, Sobol O.. "PLACE OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF THE ORGANIZATION." Management of the Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia 6.2 (2017): 29-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/25270.

APA

Eremina G. A., Sobol O. (2017). PLACE OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF THE ORGANIZATION. Management of the Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia, 6(2), 29-32. https://doi.org/10.12737/25270

Chicago

G. Eremina, Sobol O.. "PLACE OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF THE ORGANIZATION." Management of the Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia 6, no. 2 (2017): 29-32. https://doi.org/10.12737/25270.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Eremina G. A., Sobol O. | title = PLACE OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF THE ORGANIZATION | journal = Management of the Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia | year = 2017 | volume = 6 | issue = 2 | pages = 29-32 | doi = 10.12737/25270 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

PLACE OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF THE ORGANIZATION

Confirmation