To the Question of Students’ Graphic Training Quality Monitoring Effectiveness

T. V. Grosheva; G. Shelyakina

doi:10.12737/article_5a18042dd1a667.42394929

UDC 51

TO THE QUESTION OF STUDENTS’ GRAPHIC TRAINING QUALITY MONITORING EFFECTIVENESS To the Question of Students’ Graphic Training Quality Monitoring Effectiveness

АА Аа

Published in Geometry & Graphics · Volume 5, Issue 4 · Pages 75–82 · Rubric: Methodical questions of teaching

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a18042dd1a667.42394929

Received: 24.11.2017 Accepted: 24.03.2024 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

T. V. Grosheva

G. Shelyakina

T. V. Grosheva

Academic degree: candidate of technical sciences

Science rang: docent

Perm National Research Polytechnic University Russian Federation

G. Shelyakina

Perm National Research Polytechnic University Associate Professor · Russian Federation

ABSTRACT

In this paper are considered the background, carrying and effectiveness of monitoring as a basis for problem solving in the knowledge obtained during pre-university training. Professional activity’s integrity is connected with resolution in the process of professional training of element-wise, discrete study of educational material, and its whole, integrative and systematic usage. Data on entrance testing of students at one of faculties on check of base knowledge on geometry, drawing principles, and geometrical modeling are presented. During educational process a monitoring of students’ ability on “Descriptive Geometry and Engineering Graphics” discipline was carried out for tracking of rhythm related to material study and assimilation. The monitoring was carried out through problem recognition, setting objectives, revealing of core lines for course control based on work programs and fund of assessment tools. According to the results of entrance control and routine testing at the chair were organized extra classes for those students which have difficulties in the learning of some topics of the course. The aim of extra classes is alignment of knowledge on the course. The emphasis in the course schedule has been made on the most difficult topics of practical studies, and the topics allocated for independent work. The process is orientated on providing of conceptual variability and individual pace for assimilation the educational program. Comparison of learning’s initial level with the final (achieved) one allows measure the "gain" of knowledge, degree of abilities and skills formation, as well as to analyze the didactic process’s dynamics and effectiveness. Based on monitoring results analysis has been plotted the chart characterizing the dynamics of course knowledge quality.

KEYWORDS

engineering graphics, geometry, learning, monitoring, information, motivation, appraisal fund.

Text

Аэрокосмическая промышленность является одной из наиболее наукоемких и высокотехнологичных, «локомотивом» развития многих отраслей науки, техники и производства.

1. Abramchuk V.E. Primenenie sovremennykh metodov proektirovaniya v OAO «Aviadvigatel» [Application of modern design methods in OJSC "Aviadvigatel]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tekhnicheskom vuze: traditsii i innovatsii [Problems of quality of graphic training of students in technical College: traditions and innovations]. 2014, V. 1, pp. 77-84. (in Russian).

2. Belkin A.S. Osnovy vozrastnoj pedagogiki [Age-related pedagogics]. Moscow, 2001. (in Russian).

3. Vyshnepol'skij V.I., Sal'kov N.A. Celi i metody obucheniya graficheskim disciplinam [Objectives and methods of training to graphic disciplines]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and Graphics]. 2013, V. 1, I. 2, pp. 8-9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/777. (in Russian).

4. Volkhin K.A. Otsenka graficheskoj gramotnosti pervokursnika stroitelnogo universiteta [Evaluation of the graphical literacy of first-year student building of the University]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tekhnicheskom vuze: traditsii i innovatsii [Problems of quality of graphic training of students in technical College: traditions and innovations]. 2016, pp. 191-199. (in Russian).

5. Gavrilova I.V. Sovremennoe sostoyanie professionalnogo obrazovaniya i problemy podgotovki spetsialistov v usloviyakh vysshej shkoly [The current state of professional education and the problems of training specialists in the conditions of higher education]. Vestnik chuvashskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chuvash University]. 2013, I. 2, pp. 120-130. (in Russian).

6. Grosheva T.V., Sheliakina G.G. Aktual'nye momenty processa obuchenija [Actual moments of the learning process]. Zhurnal nauchnyh publikacij aspirantov i doktorantov [Journal of scientific publications graduate and doctoral students]. 2015, I. 9, pp. 47-48. (in Russian).

7. Grosheva T.V., Kochurova L.V., Turicyna I.A. K voprosu ob organizacii samostojatel'noj raboty studentov v processe graficheskoj podgotovki [To the question of the organization of independent work of students in the process of graphic preparation]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and Graphics], 2014. V. 2, I. 2, pp. 43-48. DOI: 10/12737/55924. (in Russian).

8. Grosheva T. V., Sheliakina G. G. K voprosu ob jeffektivnosti dopolnitel'nyh zanjatij [To the question about the effectiveness of extra classes]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tekhnicheskom vuze: traditsii i innovatsii [Problems of quality of graphic training of students in technical College: traditions and innovations]. 2015, pp. 331-341. (in Russian).

9. Zeer Je.F. Lichnostno-razvivajushhie tehnologii nachal'nogo professional'nogo obrazovanija [Personality-developing technologies of primary professional education]. Moscow, Publishing center "Akademiya" Publ., 2010. 176 p. (in Russian).

10. Zimnjaja I.A. Pedagogicheskaja psihologija [Pedagogical psychology]. Moscow, "Logos" Publ., 2000. 384 p. (in Russian).

11. Kadykova N.S., Sal'kov N.A. Reformirovanie ocenok geometro- graficheskih znanii [The reform of the estimates of geometric and graphic knowledge]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and Graphics]. 2013, V. 1, I. 2, pp. 52-53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/475. (in Russian).

12. Kozlova I.V. Monitoring kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov [Monitoring the quality of graphic training of students]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tehnicheskom vuze v uslovijah perehoda na obrazovatel'nye standarty novogo pokolenija [Problems of quality of graphic training of students at technical higher school in conditions of transition to educational standards of new generation]. Perm, PERM national research Polytechnic University Publ., 2010, pp. 192-198. (in Russian).

13. Majorov A.N. Monitoring v obrazovanii [Monitoring in education]. Moscow, Intellekt-Centr Publ., 2005, 424 p. (in Russian).

14. O hode reformirovanija predprijatij i organizacij aviacionnoj promyshlennosti: Materialy k zasedaniju Pravitel'stva RF 26 ijunja 2003 g. [On the reform of the enterprises and organizations of the aviation industry: materials for the RF Government meeting on 26 June 2003]. (Accessed 31 August 2016). (in Russian).

15. Polupan K.L. Monitoring kachestva obrazovaniya v vuze v usloviyah vnedreniya kompetentnostnoj modeli podgotovki specialist [Monitoring the quality of education in the University in terms of implementing a competence model of specialist training]. Vestnik Baltijskogo federal´nogo universiteta im. Kanta [Bulletin of Baltic Federal University. Kant]. 2012, I. 11, pp. 41-45. (in Russian).

16. Rukavishnikov V.A., Usanova E.V., Halueva V.V. Kompetentnostnyj podhod k formirovaniju geometromodel'noj podgotovki specialistov: bazis i nadstrojka [Competence approach to the formation of geometrololi of training: basis and superstructure]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tekhnicheskom vuze: traditsii i innovatsii [Problems of quality of graphic training of students in technical College: traditions and innovations]. 2014, V. 1, pp. 309-316. (in Russian).

17. Gerashhenko A.N., Kuprikova M.Ju., Sidorova A.Ju. Razvitie ajerokosmicheskogo obrazovanija: problemy i tendencii [The development of aerospace education: issues and trends]. Moscow, MAIPRINT Publ., 2009, 180 p. (in Russian).

18. Sal'kov N.A. Amerikanizacija geometricheskogo obrazovanija Rossii i nachertatel'noj geometrii [The Americanization of geometric education and descriptive geometry]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and Graphics]. 2015, V. 3, I. 3, pp. 38-46 DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/14418. (in Russian).

19. Salkov N.A. Problemy sovremennogo geometricheskogo obrazovaniya [Modern geometric problems of education]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tekhnicheskom vuze: traditsii i innovatsii [Problems of quality of graphic training of students in technical College: traditions and innovations]. 2014, pp. 38-46. (in Russian).

20. Selezneva N.A. Kachestvo vysshego obrazovanija kak ob#ekt sistemnogo issledovanija [The Quality of higher education as an object of systematic study]. Moscow, Issledovatel'skij centr problem kachestva podgotovki specialistov Publ., 2004, p. 95. (in Russian).

21. Federalnyj gosudarstvennyj obrazovatelnyj standart vysshego professionalnogo obrazovaniya po napravleniyu podgotovki 160700.65 «Proektirovanie aviatsionnykh i raketnykh dvigatelej» [Federal state educational standard of higher professional education in the area of training 160700.65 "Design of aviation and rocket engines"]. (in Russian).

22. Federalnyj gosudarstvennyj obrazovatelnyj standart vysshego professionalnogo obrazovaniya po napravleniyu podgotovki 151900.62 «Konstruktorsko-tekhnologicheskoe obespechenie tekhnologicheskikh proizvodstv» [Federal state educational standard of higher professional education in the field of preparation 151900.62 "Design and technological support of technological production"]. (in Russian).

23. Hotuncev Ju.L., Hotulev A.V., Nasipov A.Zh. Koncepcija nepreryvnogo tehnologicheskogo obrazovanija [The Concept of a continuous process of education]. Innovacionnye podhody k organizacii tehnologicheskogo obrazovanija, orientirovannogo na podgotovku inzhenerno-tehnicheskih kadrov [Innovative approaches to technological education-oriented training of engineering technical personnel]. Perm, Perm state pedagogical University Publ., 2012, pp. 11-35. (in Russian).

24. Chepik G.P. Problema monitoringa v psihologo-pedagogicheskih issledovanijah [The problem of monitoring in the psycho-pedagogical research]. Doshkol'noe obrazovanie: opyt, problemy, perspektivy razvitija: materialy IX Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii [Preschool education: experience, problems, development prospects: materials of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference (Cheboksary, September 30, 2016)]. 2016, I. 2 (9), pp. 206-210. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21661/r-113315. (in Russian).

25. Sheljakina G. G., Shirjaev A.A. Graficheskoe obrazovanie studentov vysshej shkoly [Graphic education high school students]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tehnicheskom vuze: tradicii i innovacii [Problems of quality of graphic training of students in technical College: traditions and innovations]. 2014, pp. 372-377. (in Russian).

JATS XML

Zamestitel' glavnogo redaktora, chlen redsoveta

Vladimir Vyshnyepolskiy

Glavnyy redaktor

A. A. Ishchenko

Vypuskayuschiy redaktor

Dar'ya Sklyankina

501@infra-m.ru

Deputy editor-in-chief, member of the editorial Board

N. Sal'kov

nikolaysalkov@mail.ru

GOST

Grosheva T. V., Shelyakina G. G. To the Question of Students’ Graphic Training Quality Monitoring Effectiveness // Geometry & Graphics. 2017. no. 4. pp. 75-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a18042dd1a667.42394929. (Date of access 20.09.2026).

MLA

T. V. Grosheva, Shelyakina G. G.. "To the Question of Students’ Graphic Training Quality Monitoring Effectiveness." Geometry & Graphics 5.4 (2017): 75-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a18042dd1a667.42394929.

APA

Grosheva T. V., Shelyakina G. G. (2017). To the Question of Students’ Graphic Training Quality Monitoring Effectiveness. Geometry & Graphics, 5(4), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a18042dd1a667.42394929

Chicago

T. V. Grosheva, Shelyakina G. G.. "To the Question of Students’ Graphic Training Quality Monitoring Effectiveness." Geometry & Graphics 5, no. 4 (2017): 75-82. https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a18042dd1a667.42394929.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Grosheva T. V., Shelyakina G. G. | title = To the Question of Students’ Graphic Training Quality Monitoring Effectiveness | journal = Geometry & Graphics | year = 2017 | volume = 5 | issue = 4 | pages = 75-82 | doi = 10.12737/article_5a18042dd1a667.42394929 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

TO THE QUESTION OF STUDENTS’ GRAPHIC TRAINING QUALITY MONITORING EFFECTIVENESS To the Question of Students’ Graphic Training Quality Monitoring Effectiveness

Confirmation