Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
I. Kant Baltic Federal University
Kaliningrad, Russian Federation
from 01.01.2009 until now
Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Kaliningrad, Russian Federation
A high-resolution nonlinear numerical model is used to simulate propagation of internal gravity waves (IGWs) from the troposphere to the upper atmosphere. This simulation takes into account background wind profiles containing critical levels at which the horizontal wind velocity becomes equal to the horizontal phase speed of IGW. According to traditional linear theories of atmospheric waves, near critical levels the vertical wavelength approaches zero, which should lead to a strong dissipation of IGWs propagating from the troposphere and may significantly decrease their amplitudes in the upper atmosphere. The wave sources in the model are defined as vertical velocity perturbations propagating along the Earth surface. The mean horizontal wind in the atmosphere is approximated by the Gaussian profile with a maximum at an altitude of 50 km. We analyze the spectra of wave fields near critical levels and at a distance from them. It has been found that the instability of waves near critical levels intensifies the energy transition from primary IGWs propagating from surface sources to secondary wave modes. This causes an increase in spectral peaks at wavelengths shorter than the horizontal length of primary IGW. Therefore, above critical levels, spectral modes with shorter horizontal wavelengths begin to prevail with increasing altitude, and the amplitudes of these secondary waves at the same altitudes can exceed the amplitudes of analogous primary IGW propagating in the absence of critical levels in the middle atmosphere.
acoustic-gravity waves, spectrum, secondary waves, numerical simulation, upper atmosphere, middle atmosphere
1. Alexander M.J., Geller M., McLandress C., Polavarapu S., Preusse P., Sass F., et al. Recent developments in gravity-wave effects in climate models and the global distribution of gravity-wave momentum flux from observations and models. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. Part A. 2010, vol. 136, pp. 1103–1124. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.637.
2. Becker E., Vadas S.L. Secondary gravity waves in the winter mesosphere: Results from a high-resolution global circulation model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2018, vol. 23, iss. 5, pp. 2605–2627. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027460.
3. Bidlingmeier E.R., Pogoreltsev A.I. Numerical modeling of the transformation of acoustic-gravitaty waves into temperature and viscous waves in the atmosphere. Izvestia. Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics. 1992, vol. 28, iss. 1, pp. 64–74. (In Russian).
4. Bowman M.R., Thomas I., Thomas R.H. The propagation of gravity waves through a critical layer for conditions of moderate wind shear. Planet. Space Sci. 1980, vol. 28, iss. 2, pp. 119–133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(80)90088-4.
5. Fritts D.C., Wang L., Werne J. Gravity wave–fine structure interactions: A reservoir of small-scale and large-scale turbulence energy. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009, vol. 36, iss. 19, L19805. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039501.
6. Fritts D.C., Wan K., Werne J., Lund T., Hecht J.H. Modeling the implications of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability dynamics for airglow observations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2014, vol. 119, pp. 8858–8871. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021737.
7. Gassmann A., Herzog H.-J. How is local material entropy production represented in a numerical model? Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 2015, vol. 141, pp. 854–869. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2404.
8. Gavrilov N.M., Kshevetskii S.P. Identification of spectrum of secondary acoustic-gravity waves in the middle and upper atmosphere in a high-resolution numerical model. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2023, vol. 9, iss. 3, pp. 86–92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-93202310.
9. Gavrilov N.M., Kshevetskii S.P. Numerical modeling of the propagation of nonlinear acoustic-gravity waves in the middle and upper atmosphere. Izvestiya, Atmos. Oceanic Phys. 2014, vol. 50, iss. 1, pp. 66–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7868/S0002351513050040.
10. Gavrilov N.M., Kshevetskii S.P., Koval A.V. Verifications of the high-resolution numerical model and polarization relations of atmospheric acoustic-gravity waves. Geoscientific Model Development. 2015, vol. 8, pp. 1831–1838. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1831-2015
11. Gavrilov N.M., Kshevetskii S.P., Koval A.V. Decay times of atmospheric acoustic-gravity waves after deactivation of wave forcing. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2022, vol. 22, pp. 3713–3724. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13713-2022.
12. Gavrilov N.M., Kshevetskii S.P., Koval A.V., Kurdyaeva Yu.A. Tunneling of acoustic-gravity waves through critical levels to the upper atmosphere. Adv. Space Res. 2025, vol. 75, iss. 4, pp. 3661–3670. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.12.005.
13. Gossard E.E., Hooke W.H. Waves in the Atmosphere: Atmospheric Infrasound and Gravity Waves: Their Generation and Propagation. Elsevier Sci. Publ. Co., 1975, 456 p.
14. Kikoin I.K. Tables of Physical Quantities. Moscow, Atomizdat Publ., 1976, pp. 272–279. (In Russian).
15. Liu X., Xu J., Liu H., Ma R. Nonlinear interactions between gravity waves with different wavelengths and diurnal tide. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2008, vol. 1139, iss. 8, D08112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009136.
16. Lomb N. Least-squares frequency analysis of unequally spaced data. Astrophys. Space Sci. 1976, vol. 39, iss. 2, pp. 447–462.
17. Miyoshi Y., Fujiwara H., Jin H., Shinagawa H. A global view of gravity waves in the thermosphere simulated by a general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2014, vol. 119, iss. 7, pp. 5807– 5820. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019848.
18. Picone J.M., Hedin A.E., Drob D.P., Aikin A.C. NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues. J. Geophys. Res. 2002, vol. 107, iss. A12, 1468. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009430.
19. Pogoreltsev A.I., Pertsev N.N. The influence of background wind on the formation of acoustic-gravity waves structure in the thermosphere. Izvestia. Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 1996, vol. 31, iss. 6, pp. 723–728.
20. Scargle J.D. Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II – Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data. Astrophys. J. 1982, vol. 263, pp. 835–853. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/160554.
21. Townsend A.A. Excitation of internal waves by a turbulent boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1965, vol. 22, pp. 241–252. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211206500071X.
22. Townsend A.A. Internal waves produced by a convective layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1966, vol. 24, pp. 307–319. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112066000661.
23. Vadas S.L., Liu H.-L. Numerical modeling of the large-scale neutral and plasma responses to the body forces created by the dissipation of gravity waves from 6 h of deep convection in Brazil. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 2013, vol. 118, pp. 2593–2617. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50249.
24. Vadas S.L., Fritts D.C., Alexander M.J. Mechanism for the generation of secondary waves in wave breaking regions. J. Atmos. Sci. 2003, vol. 60, iss. 1, pp. 194–214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005574.
25. Vadas S.L., Zhao J., Chu X., Becker E. The excitation of secondary gravity waves from local body forces: Theory and observation. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2018, vol. 123, iss. 17, pp. 9296–9325. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027970.
26. Vadas S.L., Becker E., Bossert K., Baumgarten G., Hoffmann L., Lynn Harvey V. Secondary gravity waves from the stratospheric polar vortex over ALOMAR Observatory on 12–14 January 2016. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2023, vol 128, e2022JD036985. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036985.
27. Vadas S.L., Becker E., Bossert K., Hozumi Y., Stober G., Harvey V.L., Baumgarten G., Hoffmann L. The role of the polar vortex jet for secondary and higher-order gravity waves in the northern mesosphere and thermosphere during 11–14 January 2016. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 2024, vol. 129, iss. 9, e2024JA032521. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA032521.
28. Yiğit E., Medvedev A.S. Heating and cooling of the thermosphere by internal gravity waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009, vol. 36, L14807. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038507.
29. Yu Y., Hickey M.P., Liu Y. A numerical model characterising internal gravity wave propagation into the upper atmosphere. Adv. Space Res. 2009, vol. 44, pp. 836–846. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.05.014.
30. Zhao J., Chu X., Chen C., Lu X., Fong W., Yu Z., Jones R.M., Roberts B.R., Dörnbrack A. Lidar observations of stratospheric gravity waves from 2011 to 2015 at McMurdo (77.84° S, 166.69° E), Antarctica: 1. Vertical wavelengths, periods, and frequency and vertical wave number spectra. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2017, vol. 122, iss. 10, pp. 5041–5062. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026368.
