Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Through a study of 218 companies, operating in six technology sub-sectors from 2018 to 2023, and through seventeen in-depth case studies, we have disentangled the mechanisms through which alternative equity structures influence diverse growth paths. The findings demonstrate that milestonebased, sequential financing programs accelerate revenue expansion and employee growth compared to single-stage strategies. Companies that attract domain-specialized strategic investors achieve a significant increase in R&D productivity relative to whose funded primarily by financial investors. Cluster analysis reveals four distinct archetypal patterns: Rapid Scalers, Innovation Focusers, Balanced Developers, and Conservative Growers. Each pattern is associated with a unique set of performance characteristics and dilution dynamics. In addition to capital provision, alignment of investor expertise, governance architecture, and capital deployment tempo emerge as significant factors, which influence innovation output, market expansion speed, and the sustainability of competitive advantage. These findings refine corporate finance theory by specifying conditions and mediation mechanisms, providing entrepreneurs with empirically grounded guidance for tailoring financing tactics to their specific technological domain, lifecycle stage, and strategic objectives.
equity financing, corporate growth, technological innovation, venture capital, strategic investment, financing strategy, innovation capacity, growth metrics
1. Adams R., Bessant J., Phelps R. (2021). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 587–618. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12099
2. Bertoni F., Colombo M.G., Quas A. (2019). The patterns of venture capital investment in Europe. Small Business Economics, 45(3), 543–560. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9662-0 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QSUCMG
3. Chemmanur T.J., Krishnan K., Nandy D.K. (2018). How does venture capital financing improve efficiency in private firms? A look beneath the surface. Review of Financial Studies, 24(12), 4037–4090. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr096
4. Croce A., Martí J., Murtinu S. (2020). The impact of venture capital on the productivity growth of European entrepreneurial firms: 'Screening' or 'value added' effect? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), 489–510. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.06.001
5. Drover W., Busenitz L., Matusik S., Townsend D., Anglin A., Dushnitsky G. (2017). A review and road map of entrepreneurial equity financing research: Venture capital, corporate venture capital, angel investment, crowdfunding, and accelerators. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1820–1853. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317690584
6. Ferriani S., Garnsey E., Lorenzoni G. (2019). Speciation through entrepreneurial spin-off: The Acorn-ARM story.Research Policy, 41(2), 251–269. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.001
7. Guerini M., Quas, A. (2018). Governmental venture capital in Europe: Screening and certification. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(2), 175–195. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.10.001
8. Hellmann T., Puri M. (2020). Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 169–197. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00419
9. Hsu D.H. (2016). Venture capitalists and cooperative startup commercialization strategy. Management Science, 52(2), 204–219. URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0480
10. Lerner J., Nanda R. (2020). Venture capital's role in financing innovation: What we know and how much we still need to learn. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3), 237–261. URL: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.237 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LRRHNW
11. Manigart S., Baeyens K., Van Hyfte W. (2017). The survival of venture capital backed companies. Financial Management, 31(1), 103–124. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/3666322
12. Nanda R., Rhodes-Kropf M. (2018). Investment cycles and startup innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2), 403–418. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.07.001
13. Park H.D., Steensma H.K. (2019). When does corporate venture capital add value for new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 33(1), 1–22. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.937
14. Sapienza H.J., Manigart S., Vermeir W. (2016). Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(6), 439–469. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(96)00052-3
15. Tsarkov I.N. Crowdinvesting is an innovative method of financing companies’ projects (2023). Scientific Research and Development. Russian Journal of Project Management. 12(1), 3–8. (in Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6279-2023-12-1-3-8
16. Tsiteladze D.D. Analysis of the influence of corporate venture financing on the development of innovative projects in the enterprise (2024). Scientific Research and Development. Russian Journal of Project Management. 13(3), 10–20 (in Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6279-2024-13-3-10-20
17. Zacharakis A.L., Shepherd D.A. (2021). The nature of information and overconfidence on venture capitalists' decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4), 311–332. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(99)00052-x
