Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDC 351
UDC 351.9
The purpose of the study is to identify the consequences of the digital transformation of the mechanism of public administration in conditions of uncertainty to achieve the sustainability of the system, taking into account the influences of different cultural environments and political regimes. The development of the information society is characterized by permanent changes that are caused by the influence of various factors. Their influence turns the development of society into a series of challenges and threats, crises, the relief of which is the function of the public administration system. To recognize them, the management system must be responsive to the changing demands and expectations of society, which are becoming more individual and broadcast through social networks and digital platforms. A new reality is emerging in which, thanks to digitalization, relations between government and society are becoming subject-to-subject. What does the digital transformation of public administration bring with it: benefits or risks? What are the differences between e-government and digital government? Which digital models of political regimes are most effective in conditions of social diversity and crises? How effective are the tools of the digital state for coordinating interests? The methods used in the process of writing this article were: a comparative analysis of administrative practices of different countries in the context of digitalization, a quantitative analysis of statistics and empirical data from the WGI. The main conclusions of the study are the following: digital technologies play an important role in achieving the sustainability of management systems in times of crisis, they are used as a means of controlling behavior, affecting not only information, but also in fact. According to a number of parameters, the digital version of the authoritarian political regime proves to be more effective and stable in times of crisis, compared with the digital version of the democratic model. The theoretical significance of the study lies in identifying the correlation of the consequences of the digital transformation of the public administration system with achieving sustainability in conditions of uncertainty; in determining the influence of cultural factors and types of political regimes on the speed of implementation of digital technologies in the public administration system in order to increase their sustainability and effectiveness in digital platform societies.
digital government, e-government, public administration, digital platforms, digital transformation
1. Akatkin Yu.M., Yasinovskaya E.D. Cifrovaya transformaciya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya. Datacentrichnost' i semanticheskaya interoperabel'nost': monografiya. – Moskva: Izdatel'stvo «Lenand», 2019. 724 s.
2. Bedenkova A.S. Cifrovoe pravitel'stvo kak konceptual'noe razvitie elektronnogo pravitel'stva // Polilog. – 2021. – T. 5. – № 3. – S. 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18254/S258770110015808-0; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RXFHBC
3. Berger P., Lukman T. Social'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sociologii znaniya: kniga. – Moskva: Izdatel'stvo «Medium», 1995. 323 s.
4. Boldyreva L.B. Kommunikaciya pravitel'stva i predprinimatel'skih struktur i problemy sozdaniya «cifrovogo pravitel'stva» // E-Management. - 2020. - № 1. - S. 75-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-3445-2020-1-75-85; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TQIKUZ
5. Volodenkov S.V. Obraz cifrovogo buduschego kak model' konstituirovaniya real'nosti: scenarii formirovaniya i reprezentacii // Zhurnal politicheskih issledovaniy. – 2023. – T. 7. - № 4. – S. 33-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2023-7-4-33-46; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KYOZKC
6. Volodenkov S.V., Fedorchenko A.V., Artamonova M.A. Cifrovizaciya prostranstva sovremennoy politiki v usloviyah global'nyh tehnologicheskih transformaciy: aktual'nye nauchnye podhody, modeli i scenarii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. – 2022. – T. 12. - № 2. – S. 46-57.
7. Germaniya posadit bezhencev v tyur'my [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://news.rambler.ru/world/41745985-germaniya-posadit-bezhentsev-v-tyurmy/ (data obrascheniya: 03.08.2025).
8. Ignatova T.V., Ivanova D.E., Ivanov V.E., Sibileva A.A. Innovacionnye tehnologii v gosudarstvennom upravlenii: cifrovizaciya processov i ih effektivnost' // Gosudarstvennoe i municipal'noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski. – 2024. - № 3. – S. 18–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-3-18-24; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CHFJZR
9. Kak Kitay podderzhivaet biznes vo vremya koronavirusa [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://news.myseldon.com/ru/news/index/223662517 (data obrascheniya: 04.08.2025).
10. Muhaev R.T. Politika v postmoderne: nabor praktik manipulyacii znakami // Sb. statey «Mnogolikaya politika». Izdatel'stvo: Izdatel'skie resheniya. - 2019. - S. 3-10. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BZIYWL
11. Muhaev R.T., Chubarov A.I. Kul'turnye konteksty cifrovoy transformacii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: sravnitel'nyy analiz Zapadnoy i Vostochnoy modeley // Zhurnal politicheskih issledovaniy. - 2024. - T. 8. - № 2. - S. 42-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2024-8-2-42-58; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QNTVVI
12. Popova E.V., Ustyuzhanceva O.V., Gao H. Konstruirovanie cifrovogo suvereniteta v media Rossii i Kitaya: analiz bol'shih dannyh // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2025. – T. 25. - № 2. S. 251–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2025-25-2-251-266; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MZSGVL
13. Reyting WGI [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/worldwide-governance-indicators (data obrascheniya: 03.08.2025).
14. Reyting razvitiya elektronnogo pravitel'stva OON [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/85 (data obrascheniya: 02.08.2025).
15. Statistika zabolevaemosti koronavirusnoy infekciey [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://yandex.ru/covid19/stat#development (data obrascheniya: 06.08.2025).
16. Fedorchenko S.N., Avtokratiya v cifrovoy vselennoy: perspektivy i ugrozy politicheskoy legitimacii // Zhurnal politicheskih issledovaniy. - 2020. - T. 4. - № 4. - S. 12–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2020-12-24; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TBABQQ
17. Hantington S., Berger L. Mnogolikaya globalizaciya: kul'turnoe raznoobrazie v sovremennom mire: kniga. – Moskva: Izdatel'stvo «Aspekt Press», 2004. 378 s.
18. Couldry N., Mejias U. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. California: Stanford University Press. 2019. 352 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754
19. Fuchs S. Digital Democracy and the Digital Public Sphere. New York: Routledge. 2022. 320 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003331087
20. Hintz A., Dencik L., Wahl-Jorgensen K. Digital Citizenship in a Datafied Society. Cambridge: Polity. 2019. 180 p.
21. Strengthening economic resilience: insights from the post-1970 record of severe recessions and financial crises [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: Strengthening-economic-resilience-insightsfrom-the-post-1970-record-of-severe-recessions-and-financial-crises-policy-paperdecember-2016.pdf (data obrascheniya: 10.08.2025).
22. Zuboff S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs. 2019. 717 p.
