Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDC 33
The relevance of the study is due to the need to increase the efficiency of the use of public resources and the search for optimal coordination models for organizations in the context of modernization of Russian education. The purpose of the work is to identify the features of the influence of coordination methods on the allocative efficiency of the functioning of educational organizations and to determine the factors that contribute to improving the effectiveness of the functioning of educational organizations. As research methods, the author uses a correlation analysis of the indicators of allocative efficiency and intensity of the use of coordination mechanisms, as well as a comparison of data obtained for organizations of various types: state, non-profit and market. The main results show that a strong correlation in the intensity of the use of coordination methods is observed mainly for organizations operating in a market model, especially in terms of the return on direct costs. At the same time, the expansion of the output of the social sphere occurs at the expense of an increase in public resources, and not at the expense of increasing the internal efficiency of organizations. The use of hybrid coordination aimed at supporting NPOs does not demonstrate a significant correlation with allocative efficiency. The final assessments indicate the need to adjust the existing model of coordination to improve the organizational efficiency of the subjects of the education market.
education, allocative efficiency, coordination models, management methods, hybrid model
1. Ogorodnikova E.S., Plahin A.E., Rostovcev K.V. Gibridnaya model' sfery social'nyh uslug: organizacionno-ekonomicheskie aspekty // Journal of new economy. 2022. T. 23. №. 1. S. 131-148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2022-23-1-7.
2. Dik M.A. Osnovnye tendencii i perspektivy razvitiya normativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya sfery obschego obrazovaniya Rossii // Voprosy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2019. №. 5 (50). S. 132-141.
3. Plahin A.E. i dr. Upravlenie processami ustoychivogo razvitiya: mikro, mezo i makrouroven'. 2024. Moskva. INFRA-M. 282s.
4. Bayborodova L.V., Stepanova T.A. Osobennosti vvedeniya federal'nyh gosudarstvennyh obrazovatel'nyh standartov obschego obrazovaniya v sel'skoy shkole // Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik. 2011. T. 2. №. 4. S. 66-73.
5. Smith A. The Influences on the English mainstream primary school Special Educational Needs Coordinator (SENCO) in a quasi-market led national educational system // Journal of Exceptional People. 2021. T. 10. №. 18. S. 23-42.
6. Joudyian N., Doshmangir L., Mahdavi M., Tabrizi J.S., Gordeev V.S. Public-private partnerships in primary health care: a scoping review // BMC health services research. 2021. T. 21. S. 1-18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05979-9.
7. Hodge G.A., Greve C. Public–private partnerships: an international performance review // Public administration review. 2007. T. 67. №. 3. S. 545-558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x
8. Veretennikova A.Yu., Korovin G.B. Model' razvitiya investiciy social'nogo vozdeystviya na osnove kraudlendingovyh platform // Upravlenec. 2025. T. 16. № 4. S. 54-69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2025-16-4-4.
9. Khorin A.N., Brovkin A.V., Potanina Y.M. Management economic environment of non-profit organizations // Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2018. T. 9. №. 2 (32). S. 522-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.4(34).15
10. Dvoryadkina E.B., Prostova D.M. Nekommercheskie organizacii v regional'noy ekonomike: teoreticheskiy podhod k issledovaniyu // Journal of new economy. 2019. T. 20. №. 4. S. 47-69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-4-3.
11. Ogorodnikova E.S., Plakhin A.E. Comparative assessment of the allocative efficiency of the functioning of state, commercial and non-profit social organizations // Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2025. T. 18. № 3. S. 168-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2025.3.99.9
12. Mihnenko P.A. Vliyanie intellektual'nyh sistem podderzhki prinyatiya resheniy na transformaciyu upravlencheskih praktik // Upravlenec. 2025. T. 16, № 6. S. 2-16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2025-16-6-1.
13. Golubin A.V. Informacionno-analiticheskaya podderzhka strategicheskogo upravleniya priemom v universitet // Cifrovye modeli i resheniya. 2025. T. 4, № 2. S. 18-27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2949-477X-2025-4-2-2.
14. Nikitina O.M. Ot tradicionnogo universiteta k razvitiyu metavselennoy: setevye i celevye effekty // Cifrovye modeli i resheniya. 2024. T. 3, № 2. S. 73-84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2949-477X-2024-3-2-6.
