Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
employee from 01.09.1990 until now
Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nyneshnee, zatyanuvsheesya na desyatiletiya depressivnoe sostoyanie lesnogo sektora ekonomiki v Rossiyskoy Federacii privelo k disproporcii mezhdu social'no-ekonomicheskim effektom i zatratami na podderzhanie prirodnogo potenciala lesov. Prichina kroetsya v ustarevshem stile i metodah upravleniya lesnymi blagami po vsem ih vazhneyshim funkciyam. V stat'e predlagaetsya ispol'zovat' polozhitel'nyy zarubezhnyy opyt realizacii principov lesnogo menedzhmenta kak orientira dlya provedeniya korennyh preobrazovaniy sistemy upravleniya lesnym sektorom ekonomiki. Lesnoy menedzhment – eto effektivnaya sistema upravleniya vosproizvodimym prirodnym ob'ektom cennosti v rynochnoy ekonomike. On posluzhit nachalom kreativnogo stanovleniya otechestvennogo stilya rachitel'nogo pol'zovaniya bogatstvami lesov dlya obschestvennyh nuzhd i rossiyskogo naseleniya. Usloviya razvitiya cifrovoy rynochnoy ekonomiki blagopriyatstvuyut primeneniyu metodov menedzhmenta v lesnom sektore. Predlagayutsya teoretiko-metodologicheskie podhody k formirovaniyu lesnogo menedzhmenta, opredeleno ego mesto v sisteme ekonomicheskih i upravlencheskih nauk, etapy formirovaniya strategii i taktiki ego poetapnogo stanovleniya: kardinal'noe obnovlenie normativnoy bazy i na ee osnove sovershenstvovanie metodiki kolichestvennoy i stoimostnoy ocenki ekologo-tehnologicheski dostupnyh resursov i poleznyh funkciy lesnyh ekosistem s primeneniem sredstv sovremennyh metodov poznaniya. Eto razreshit problemu riskov proektnogo menedzhmenta v processe stanovlenii lesnyh biznesov pri postanovke v izvestnost' razmerov lesnyh regional'nyh bogatstv kak ob'ektov upravleniya oborotom lesnyh vidov resursov vo vremeni i prostranstve s uchetom zatrat na ih ekonomicheskoe vosproizvodstvo na territorii zemel' gosudarstvennogo lesnogo fonda.
lesnoy menedzhment, lesnye resursy, normativy ekonomicheskoy ocenki
1. Belik I.S. Ocenka i diagnostika ekologo-ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti territoriy: monografiya. Ekaterinburg. UGTU-UPI. 2008.
2. Bezrukova T.L., Preshkin G.A., Nohrina G.L. Koncepciya prirodno-hozyaystvennogo kompleksa // Aktu-al'nye napravleniya nauchnyh issledovaniy XXI veka: teoriya i praktika: sb. nauch. tr. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. - Voronezh. 2014. № 3.Ch.3. S. 394-399.
3. Vyvodcev N.V. Celi i zadachi lesoustroystva v novoy koncepcii upravleniya lesnym hozyaystvom // Pro-blemy regional'noy ekologii: materialy Vtoroy vserossiyskoy konferencii. - Novosibirsk: izd-vo SO RAN. 2000.
4. Deming E. Novaya ekonomika. The new Economics for Industry, Government, Education: monografiya. M: Ekmo. 2006
5. Svyatoe evangelie (s prilozheniyami). Klin: Hristianskaya zhizn'. 2006.
6. Kazakov N.V., Ryabuhin P.B. Metody ucheta drevostoev lesosek i monitoringa proizvedennoy produkcii // Lesnoy zhurnal. 2017. № 5. S.103-109.
7. Kovalevich D.A. Segodnya konkuriruyut ne kompanii, a klastery. URL:www.atomic-energy.ru/interviews/2012/17/31034.
8. Kozhuhov, N.I., Kozhemyako N.P., Fitchin A.A. Konceptual'nye podhody k formirovaniyu lesopromysh-lennyh klasterov v Rossii // Lesotehnicheskiy zhurnal. 2017. № 3. S. 236-253.
9. Lesnoe upravlenie: monografiya / A.V. Neverov [i dr.]. Minsk. Pechatkovaya shkola. 2014.
10. Mehrencev A.V., Preshkin G.A., Rusin K.I. [i dr.]. Upravlenie proektami lesopol'zovaniya - al'terna-tiva lesoustroystvu // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2016. № 11(152). S. 41-45. URL: www.avu.usaca.ru.
11. Organizaciya ustoychivogo lesopol'zovaniya v Krasnoyarskom krae [Sokolov V.A i dr.]: otv. red. I.V. Semechkin; In-t lesa im. V.N. Sukacheva SO RAN, Sib. mezh. in-t lesa, Krasnoyarskoe reg. obschestv. eko-dvizhenie «Druz'ya sibirskih lesov». - Novosibirsk: Izd-vo SO RAN. 2009.
12. Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 9 maya 2017 g. № 203 «O strategii razvitiya informacionnogo obschestva v Ros-siyskoy Federacii na 2017-2030 gody». URL ttp://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_216363/
13. Preshkin, G.A. Normativy ocenki lesnyh blag: problemy, resheniya: monografiya. - Ekaterinburg. Ural. gos. lesotehn. un-t. 2011.
14. Preshkin G.A. Ekonomicheskie mehanizmy perevoda lesopol'zovaniya na innovacionnuyu model' ustoychi-vogo upravleniya // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gos. agrarn. un-ta. 2014. № 2 (46). S. 229-232.
15. Stepanov S.V. Napravleniya i mehanizmy gosudarstvennogo uchastiya v razvitii lesnogo sektora Rossiy-skoy Federacii // Lesnoy vestnik. 2014. № 3. S. 50-55.
16. Orlov M.M. Lesoupravlenie. - M.: Izd. dom «Lesn. pr-t'», 2006.
17. Ferova I.S., Tanenkova E.N. Klasternaya model' kak instrument ustoychivogo innovacionnogo razvi-tiya Krasnoyarskogo kraya // Upravlenec. 2015. № 5(57). S. 58-63.
18. Altunina T.M., Preshkin G.A. Information as an economic resource / SGEM conf. on political sciences, law, finance, economics & tourism: Intern. conf. proceeds (Economics & tourism), Vol. III. Albena. Bulgaria. 2014. pp. 285 -291.
19. Chen S., Shahi C., Chen H., etc. Economic analysis of forest management alternatives: Compositional objec-tives, rotation ages, and harvest methods in boreal forests // Forest Policy and Economics. 2017. Vol. 85. Part 1. pp. 124-134.
20. Davis, L.S. (2008) Forest Management. Textbook. URL: Lisalill.com/ebookpage/116657-Forest=Management.
21. Deal R., Smith N., Gates J. Ecosystem services to enhance sustainable forest management in the US: moving from forest service national programmes to local projects in the Pacific Northwest // Forestry.2017. Vol. 90. Essie 5. pp. 632-639.
22. Eriksson L., Bjorkman C., Klapwijk M. General public acceptance of forest risk management strategies in Swe-den: Comparing three approaches to acceptability // Environment and Behavior. 2018. Vol. 50. Essie 2. pp. 159-186.
23. Lexer M., Bugmann H. Mountain forest management in a changing world // European Journal of Forest Re-search. 2017. Vol. 136. Essie 5-6. pp. 981-992.
24. Liubachyna A., Bubbico A., Secco L., etc. Management goals and performance: clustering state forest manage-ment organizations in Europe with multivariate statistics // Forests. 2017. Vol. 8. Essie 12. Paper # 504.
25. Mollmann, T., Moehring B. A practical way to integrate risk in forest management decisions // Annals of Forest Science. 2017. Vol. 74. Essie 4. pp. 137-145.
26. Mobtaker A., Ouhimmou M., Ronnqvist M., etc. Development of an economically sustainable and balanced tactical forest management plan: a case study in Quebec // Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2018. Vol. 48. Essie 2. pp. 197-207.
27. Jovanovič M., Milanovič M., Zorn M. The use of NDVI and CORINE land cover databases for forest manage-ment in Serbia // Acta Geographica Slovenica-Geografski Zbornik. 2018. Vol. 58. Essie 1. pp. 109-123.
