The appeal to the study of the concept of "justice" is due to several reasons: the ambiguity of the concept itself, its evolution in various socio-cultural contexts, the social need for a reflexive analysis of justice itself as a value that is being transformed in the process of social change, realized by researchers, justice has a special meaning for the self-determination of young people, who, in the process of upbringing, assimilated the transmitted values of an industrial society, but right now in society there are changes in morality, value attitudes, the system of ideals and norms, and an important place in this foundation should be given to "justice" as a category of moral, legal and socio-political. In this regard, the phenomenon of justice requires study and reflective analysis. Of particular interest is the study of the following questions: How does justice fit into the new structure of social space? Doesn't this concept of integrity and universality lose? Does society retain the value perception of justice in its "traditional" form, or is there a value erosion, as a result of which value actually disappears, turning into a simulacrum? The authors made an attempt to record the dynamics of the meanings of justice at different stages of social development, and also, through the focus group method, to establish that the concept of justice among young people, on the one hand, has not yet been fully reflected, but at the same time is an element of their value system, The “new” understanding of justice among young people is associated with the idea of the existence of conditions that provide an opportunity for self-realization for everyone, the disclosure of a person's inner resources. Young people consider the aspect of caring for people with disabilities, disabled, unemployed to be important in defining justice.
justice, postrational morality, focus group method
1. Bodriyyar, Zhan. Simulyakry i simulyacii [Tekst] / Zh. Bodriyyar; per. s fr. A. Kachalova. - M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «POSTUM», 2015. - 240 s.
2. Bodriyyar, Zhan. Simvolicheskiy obmen i smert' [Tekst] / - M.: «Dobrosvet», 2000. - 387 s.
3. Bodriyyar, Zhan. Prozrachnost' zla [Tekst] / Zh.Bodriyyar; perevod na russkiy yazyk: L. Lyubarskaya, E. Markovskaya. - M., 2000. // Elektronnaya publikaciya: Centr gumanitarnyh tehnologiy. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/3413.
4. Braymen, A. Metody social'nyh issledovaniy. Gruppy, organizacii i biznes [Tekst] / A. Braymen, E. Bell. H.: Izd-vo Gumanitarnyy centr, 2012. - 776 s.
5. Viktoruk, E. N. Innovacionnye tehnologii eticheskogo obrazovaniya [Tekst] / E.N. Viktoruk, E.A. Viktoruk. - Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyar. gos. ped. un-t im. V.P. Astaf'eva, 2014. - 234 s.
6. Viktoruk, E.N. Moral'noe liderstvo kak instrument preodoleniya social'nogo konflikta v molodezhnoy srede [Tekst] / E.N. Viktoruk, V.V. Mineev, S.I. Artem'eva // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Social'no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya i tehnologii. Izdatel'stvo: Obschestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu «Nauchno-izdatel'skiy centr INFRA-M» (Moskva). 2019. T.8. №.3. S. 11-18.
7. Komova M.V. Simulyakry kak sredstva manipulyacii obschestvennym soznaniem: v svete teorii Zh. Bodriyyara [Tekst] / M.V. Komova // Sovremennye issledovaniya social'nyh problem (elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal), ModernResearchofSocialProblems. - 2013. - №11(31).
8. Kryuger R. Fokus-gruppy. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo dlya prikladnyh issledovaniy (referat) [Tekst] / R. Kryuger. - SagePublikati, 1988. URL: https://rudocs.exdat.com/docs/index-173759.html.
9. Maksvell Dzh. Net takogo ponyatiya kak delovaya etika [Tekst] / Dzh. Maksvell; per.s angl. E.A. Samsonov. - Minsk: Poppuri, 2004. - 192 s.
10. Pechenkina, O. A. Era total'noy simulyacii, ili iskusstvennoe voskreshenie real'nosti [Tekst] //Bodriyyar Zh. Simulyakry i simulyaciya. - 2013. - S. 3-15.
11. Platon. Gosudarstvo. Zakony. Politik [Tekst] / Platon; predisl. E. I. Temnova. - M.:Mysl', 1998. - 798 s.
12. Rosanna L. Breen (2006) A Practical Guide to Focus-Group Research, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30:3, pp. 463-475, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260600927575
13. Silic, I., Dulcic, Z. and Visic, M. (2013) Values and the value system of the youth, using the example of student population: Comparison of Germany and Croatia, Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506201311315608.
