employee from 01.01.1998 until now
Lomonosov Moscow State University
employee from 01.01.1998 to 01.01.2023
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
Object. Welfare indices of world countries are investigated in the paper. Subject. Along with known initial welfare indices of world countries some new author’s indices are introduced. Theoretical Aspect of the Subject. The new initial Index of Progressiveness of the scale of taxation of income of individuals is introduced. Some new summary interval socioeconomic indices are introduced, namely: the Multi-Factor Country Prosperity Indices and the Multi-Factor Country Flourishing Indices. Empirical Aspect of the Subject. The initial and summary indices in question are calculated for the forty main world countries for which it was succeeded to find all necessary initial indices. Principal Theoretical and Empirical Propositions of the Paper. The analysis of calculated distributions of the main world countries according to the Prosperity Indices and the Flourishing Indices (for 2009–2012) shows that Russia and Brazil have clase values of their Indices. And the both countries are almost in all distributions in two most lower decimal parts of intervals of values of the corresponding indices. Besides, it is show that there exists positive linear-trend dependence of the world countries prosperity on the progressiveness of the scale of taxation of income of individuals. Moreover, by means of calculation of the correlation coefficients it is show that this linear-trend dependence is substantially linear-functional. Conclusions. The flat scale of taxation of income of individuals, accepted in Russia, has negative influence on the country’s prosperity. The transition to progressive scale will exert positive influence onto the rise of the Prosperity Indices of Russia. Purposes. The first purpose of the paper is to expose a row of socioeconomic factors and reveal their influence on the prosperity and the flourishing of main world countries. The second purpose is to study the influence on the prosperity and the flourishing of countries of such factors as: the shower gross internal product, the average monthly salary, the Gini coefficient, the public debt, the share of gold in the international reserve assets. The third purpose is to determine the force of functional dependence of the Country Prosperity Indices from the Index of Progressiveness of the scale of taxation of income of individuals by means of calculation of the correlation coefficients.
a tax on the income of individuals, per capita GDP (gross domestic product per head of the population), average monthly salary, Jeanie’s coefficient, public debt, share of gold in the international reserve assets, the index of progressiveness of the scale of taxation of income of individuals, summary indices of prosperity and flourishing.
1. Введение
Приведем важную цитату из работы1, снабдив ее дополнительными ссылками: «Одним из существенных недостатков отечественной налоговой политики является ее ярко выраженная фискальная направленность. Наряду с фискальной функцией на первый план должна выйти и социальная функция, посредством которой происходит реализация социальных обязательств государства и перераспределение доходов между различными категориями граждан с целью поддержания социального равновесия в обществе [Захаров, Голикова, 2014, 7], [Костылева, 2011, 10], [Погорлецкий, 2013, 15], [Шевяков, 2011, 26], [Шевяков, 2007, 27].
Сегодня в мировой практике наиболее распространенной формой реализации социальной направленности налоговой политики является использование прогрессивного налогообложения, соответствующего принципам социальной справедливости, т.е. «богатые платят больше» и в абсолютном, и в относительном измерении2 [Ябурова, 2014, 27]. Прогрессивное обложение доходов населения присуще практически всем развитым странам мира [Суханова, 2014, 21], [Фролов, 1995, 23], [Piketty, Saez, 2003, 28].
_____________
1 Калинина О.В. Принципы и методы социально ориентированного развития налоговой политики Российской Федерации: автореф. дис. Введение. Научная библиотека диссертаций и авторефератов disserCat [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа. URL:http://www.dissercat.com/content/printsipy-i-metody-sotsialno-orientirovannogorazvitiya-nalogovoi-politiki-rossiiskoi-federa#ixzz2rPXL0clg
1. Abalkin L.I. Banking system of Russia. Reference book of a banker. Moscow, DeKA Publ., 1995. (in Russian)
2. Abramov M.D. A bout taxes, salary, and economic growth. Questions of Economy. 2008, I. 5. (in Russian)
3. Androsova T.I. Problem of differentiation of incomes in modern Russia. E conomy and society. 2014, I. 2 (11). (in Russian)
4. Balatsky E. V., S aakyants K.M. Indices of social inequality. Monitoring of public opinion. 2006, I. 2 (78), pp. 122-128. (in Russian)
5. Gritsenko A.N. Public external debt and macroeconomic dynamics. Problems of modern economy. 2012, I. 1 (41), pp. 78-80. (in Russian)
6. Money. C redit. Banks. Moscow, KNORUS Publ., 2010. (in Russian)
7. Zakharov V.K., Golikova E.I. Progressiveness of the scale of taxation of income of individuals and indicator of prosperity of the country. Russia: tendencies and perspectives of development. Annual. Moscow, ISISS RAS Publ., 2014. Iss. 9. Part 1, pp. 63-69. (in Russian)
8. Istomina N.A. , A nkudinova A. P. Theory and practice of the state control of incomes and expenses of individuals. National interests: priorities and securities. 2013, I. 12 (201). (in Russian)
9. Kashin V.A., C huyev A. V., A bramov M.D. , Pankov V.V. Taxation doctrine. Ways of improvement of taxation system of the Russian F ederation. A utonomous nonprofitable organization «Expert and Analytical Center for Modernization and Technological Development of Economy». Proceedings. Мoscow, 2011, I. 2. (in Russian)
10. Kostyleva L. V. I nequality of Russian population: tendencies, factors, regulation. Vologda, I nstitute of social and economic development of territories of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2011. (in Russian)
11. Kostyleva L. V. Taxation as mechanism of regulation of inequality of population. E conomic and social changes: facts, tendencies, forecast. 2011. V. 15, I. 3. (in Russian)
12. Criticism of modern bourgeois theories of finance, money, and credit. Under the editorship of the prof. G.P. S olyus. Moscow, Finances Publ., 1978. (in Russian)
13. Nigmatullin R.I., C huyev A. V., A bramov M.D. , Babkin K.A., Kashin V.A., Korchevoy E.A. , N igmatullin B.I., Shevyakov A. Yu. M odernization of Russia: problems and ways of their decision. A utonomous non-profitable organization «Expert and Analytical Center for Modernization and Technological Development of Economy». Proceedings. Moscow, 2012. (in Russian)
14. Petrukhina E.N. Practical solution of problems of accounting of the tax of income of individuals. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic Institute. 2010. V. 1, I. 1. (in Russian)
15. Pogorletsky A.I. The individual income taxation in world and Russian practice: current tendencies and perspectives. Business Inform. 2013, I. 11. (in Russian)
16. Popova D. O. Russian F ederation. Bulletin of the international organizations. 2013, V. 8, I. 3. pp. 120-131. (in Russian)
17. Proposals of «Civil twenty» on ensuring positive, steady, balanced, and inclusive growth: report. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2013. (in Russian)
18. Nekipelov A.D. , I vanter V.V., Glazyev S. Yu. Russia on the way to modern dynamic and effective economy: the report of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow, Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2013. Available at: http://ria.ru
19. Rudakova O., Kharitonov E. Prosperous strata of Russian society: number and mechanism of formation of incomes. Staff administration. 2008, I. 5. (in Russian)
20. Rusetskaya E.A. I ndicators of social sphere characterizing threats to national security. National interests: priorities and securities. 2010, I. 1 (58). (in Russian)
21. Sukhanova E. V. Taxation of income of individuals in Russia and Japan: comparative analysis. C oncept. 2014, I. 1. (in Russian)
22. Senchagov V.K. Finances, monetary circulation, and credit. Moscow, Prospectus Publ., 2010. (in Russian)
23. Frolov M.A. Taxation of individuals in Japan. Proceedings of East Institute. 1995, I. 2. (in Russian)
24. Chunina G.Ya., Golovanova G.S. Basic ways of improvement of taxation of income of individuals in the Russian Federation. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 3: Economy. Ecology. 2011. V. 3, I. 1. (in Russian)
25. Shevyakov A. Yu., Chuyev A. V., Abramov M.D., Kiruta A.Ya., S optsov V.V., Zharomsky V.S. Modernization of income tax and lowering of social inequality. Autonomous non-profitable organization «Expert and Analytical C enter for M odernization and Technological Development of Economy». Proceedings. Moscow, 2011, I. 3. (in Russian)
26. Shevyakov A. Yu. Social policy and reforming distributive relations. Bulletin of Russian A cademy of S ciences. 2007. V. 77, I. 3, pp. 195-210. (in Russian)
27. Yaburova D. V. Shortcomings and tendencies of development of the tax of income of individuals in the Russian Federation. Modern economy: problems, tendencies, perspectives. 2014, I. 10 (1). (in Russian)
28. Piketty Th., S aez E. I ncome inequality in the United States, 1913-1998. The Quarterly Journal of E conomics. 2003. V. 115, pp. 1-39.
29. Reinert E. H ow Rich C ountries Got Rich and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. − London: Constable, 2007.
30. Spilker B., Ayers B., Robinson J., Outslay E. , Worsham R. Taxation of I ndividuals and Business E ntities. McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2015.
