Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation
Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation
Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation
Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Current state of forest carbon budget accounting both in Russia and abroad is characterized by wide variety of methodological approaches and models. Therefore, final estimates have discrepancies. The results of comparative analysis of methods used to assess carbon sequestration in pine-birch forest stands are presented. The composition, growth and biological productivity of forest stands were analyzed as well as carbon stock was calculated for pine-birch forest stands in various age groups in the Central Forest-Steppe. The dynamics of biological productivity of modal forest stands with mixed composition is investigated. Significant differences were found in quantitative assessment of carbon deposited by forest stands obtained with three different methodologies. Discrepancies in carbon content estimations in forest stands with different age and composition obtained by different methods vary from 2.0 to 33.9%. The problem of reliable assessment of carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems of the Central Forest-Steppe requires regional approaches in development of assessment methods to provide precise results and minimize uncertainty of evaluations
phytomass, biological productivity, carbon sequestration, mixed forest stands
1. Huang L., Zhou M., Ly J., Chen K. Trends in global research in forest carbon sequestration: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;252: 119908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119908.
2. Lin B., Ge J. Valued forest carbon sinks: How much emissions abatement costs could be reduced in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;224: 455-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.221.
3. Shu Sh., Zhu W., Wang W. et al. Effects of tree size heterogeneity on carbon sink in old forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 2019;432: 637-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.023.
4. Haenssgen M. J., Lechner A. M., Rakotonarivo S. et al. Implementation of the COP26 declaration to halt forest loss must safeguard and include Indigenous people. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2022;6: 235-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01650-6.
5. Schepaschenko D., Karminov V., See L. et al. Russian forest sequesters substantially more carbon than previously reported. Scientific Reports. 2021;11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92152-9.
6. Roxburgh S. H., Wood S. W., Mackey B. G. et al. Assessing the Carbon Sequestration Potential of Managed Forests: A Case Study from Temperate Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2006;43: 1149-1159.
7. Ramochnaya konvenciya OON ob izmenenii klimata. Oficial'nyy russkiy perevod. OON, 1992. 30 s.
8. Kiotskiy protokol k ramochnoy konvencii Organizacii Ob'edinennyh naciy ob izmenenii klimata. Oficial'nyy russkiy perevod. OON, 2005.
9. Shvidenko A. Z., Schepaschenko D. G. Uglerodnyy byudzhet lesov Rossii. Sibirskiy lesnoy zhurnal. 2014. № 1. S. 69-92.
10. Zamolodchikov D. G., Grabovskiy V. I., Kraev G. N. Dinamika byudzheta ugleroda lesov Rossii za dva poslednih desyatiletiya. Lesovedenie. 2011. № 6. S. 16-28.
11. Zamolodchikov D. G., Grabovskiy V. I., Korovin G. N. Upravlenie byudzhetom ugleroda lesov dal'nego vostoka Rossii: prognoznyy analiz po modeli CBM-CFS. Lesnaya taksaciya i lesoustroystvo. 2009. № 1 (41). S. 98-103.
12. Zamolodchikov D. G., Grabovskiy V. I., Shulyak P. P., Chestnyh O. V. Vliyanie pozharov i zagotovok drevesiny na uglerodnyy balans lesov Rossii. Lesovedenie. 2013. № 5. S. 36-49.
13. Korotkov V. N., Romanovskaya A. A., Karaban' R. T., Smirnov N. S. Ocenka uglerodnogo byudzheta lesov Rossii v ramkah otchetnosti po Kiotskomu protokolu. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa. Lesnoy vestnik. 2012. № 7. S. 58-64.
14. Kurbatova A. I. Analiticheskiy obzor po sovremennym issledovaniyam izmeneniy bioticheskih sostavlyayuschih uglerodnogo cikla. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekologiya i bezopasnost' zhiznedeyatel'nosti. 2020. T. 28. № 4. S. 428-438.
15. Filipchuk A. N., Malysheva N. V., Moiseev B. N., Strahov V. V. Analiticheskiy obzor metodik ucheta vybrosov i pogloscheniya lesami parnikovyh gazov iz atmosfery. Lesohozyaystvennaya informaciya. 2016. № 3. S. 36-85.
16. Mackey B., Moomaw W., Lindenmayer D., Keith H. Net carbon accounting and reporting are a barrier to understanding the mitigation value of forest protection in developed countries. Environmental Research Letters. 2022;17: 054028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01650-6.
17. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po kolichestvennomu opredeleniyu ob'ema pogloscheniya parnikovyh gazov. Utverzhdeny rasporyazheniem MPR RF ot 30.06.2017 № 20-r. URL: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/456079177.
18. Voronov M. P., Usol'cev V. A., Chasovskih V. P. Issledovanie metodov i razrabotka informacionnoy sistemy opredeleniya i kartirovaniya deponiruemogo lesami ugleroda v srede Natural. Ekaterinburg : UGLTU, 2012. 192 s.
19. Chumachenko S. I., Palenova M. M., Korotkov V. N. Prognoz dinamiki taksacionnyh pokazateley lesnyh nasazhdeniy pri raznyh scenariyah vedeniya lesnogo hozyaystva: model' dinamiki lesnyh nasazhdeniy FORRUS-S. Ekologiya, monitoring i racional'noe prirodopol'zovanie. MGUL, 2001. Vyp. 314. S. 128-146.
20. Usol'cev V. A. Fitomassa i pervichnaya produkciya lesov Evrazii. Ekaterinburg : URO RAN, 2010. 570 s.
21. Usoltsev V. A., Tsepordey I. S., Zukow W. Carbon deposition by Russian forests on the example of taiga and forest-steppe zones. Ecological Questions. 2021;32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2021.023.
22. Usoltsev V. A., Shobairi S. O. R., Tsepordey I. S. Feedback Modelling of Natural Stand and Plantation Biomass to Changes in Climatic Factors (Temperatures and Precipitation): A Special Case for Two-needles Pines in Eurasia. Journal of Climate Change. 2020;6: 15-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JCC200009.
23. Shvidenko A.Z., Shepaschenko D.G. Uglerodnyy byudzhet lesov Rossii. Sibirskiy lesnoy zhurnal. 2014. № 1. S. 69-92.
24. Shvidenko A. Z., Schepaschenko D. G., Nil'sson S., Buluy Yu. I. Tablicy i modeli hoda rosta i produktivnosti nasazhdeniy osnovnyh lesoobrazuyuschih porod Severnoy Evrazii (normativno-spravochnye materialy). Izd. 2, dop. Moskva, 2008. 886 s.
25. Schepaschenko D., Shvidenko A., See L. et al. A dataset of forest biomass structure for Eurasia. Scientific data. 2017;4: 170070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.70.
26. Zamolodchikov D. G., Grabovskiy V. I., Kraev G. N. Dinamika byudzheta ugleroda lesov Rossii za dva poslednih desyatiletiya. Lesovedenie. 2011. № 6. S. 16-28.
27. Usol'cev V. A. Biologicheskaya produktivnost' lesov Severnoy Evrazii. Ekaterinburg : URO RAN, 2007. 637 s.
28. Fedorov B. G., Moiseev B. N., Sinyak Yu. V. Pogloschayuschaya sposobnost' lesov Rossii i vybrosy uglekislogo gaza energeticheskimi ob'ektami. Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2011. № 3. S. 127-142.
29. Moiseev B. N., Filipchuk A. N. Metodika MGEIK dlya rascheta godichnogo deponirovaniya ugleroda i ocenka ee primeneniya dlya lesov Rossii. Lesnoe hozyaystvo. 2009. № 4. S. 11-13.
30. Nazarenko A. E., Krasnoyarova B. A. Stoimostnaya ocenka ekosistemnyh uslug po deponirovaniyu ugleroda ekosistemami Altayskogo kraya kak sostavlyayuschaya perehoda k ustoychivomu razvitiyu. Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov. 2018. T. 4 (14). Vyp. 3. S. 89-99.
