COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION ACCOUNTING METHODS BY PINE-BIRCH FOREST PLANTATIONS IN VORONEZH REGION

Mamonov Dmitry; Morkovina Svetlana Sergeevna; Matveev Sergey Mihaylovich; Sheshnitsan Sergey; Ivetić Vladan

doi:doi:10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2022.3/1

Home / Journals / Forestry Engineering Journal / Volume 12 Issue 3 / COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION ACCOUNTING METHODS BY PINE-BIRCH FOREST PLANTATIONS IN VORONEZH REGION

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION ACCOUNTING METHODS BY PINE-BIRCH FOREST PLANTATIONS IN VORONEZH REGION

Submit manuscript Download PDF
Text

To cite

Citations:

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION ACCOUNTING METHODS BY PINE-BIRCH FOREST PLANTATIONS IN VORONEZH REGION

Journal: FORESTRY ENGINEERING JOURNAL Volume 12 № 3 , 2022

Rubrics: ECOLOGY

Mamonov Dmitry ¹

Morkovina Svetlana Sergeevna ²

Matveev Sergey Mihaylovich ³

Sheshnitsan Sergey ⁴

Ivetić Vladan ⁵

Author and publication information

Authors:

1. Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G.F. Morozov (Engineering Center)

Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation

2. Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G.F. Morozov (prorektor po nauke i innovaciyam)

Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation

3. Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G.F. Morozov (Department of forest inventory, forest taxation and forest management, Head of Department)

Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation

4. Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G.F. Morozov (Engineering Center, Chief Researcher)

Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation

5. University of Belgrade (Faculty of Forestry, Full professor)

Russian Federation

Type:

Article

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2022.3/1

Pages:

from 4 to 15

Status:

Published

Received:

16.08.2022

Accepted:

13.10.2022

Published:

13.10.2022

Language:

Russian

Keywords:

phytomass, biological productivity, carbon sequestration, mixed forest stands

Funding:

The research was carried out within the state assignment of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme No. FZUR-2022-0005)

Abstract and keywords

Abstract (English):
Current state of forest carbon budget accounting both in Russia and abroad is characterized by wide variety of methodological approaches and models. Therefore, final estimates have discrepancies. The results of comparative analysis of methods used to assess carbon sequestration in pine-birch forest stands are presented. The composition, growth and biological productivity of forest stands were analyzed as well as carbon stock was calculated for pine-birch forest stands in various age groups in the Central Forest-Steppe. The dynamics of biological productivity of modal forest stands with mixed composition is investigated. Significant differences were found in quantitative assessment of carbon deposited by forest stands obtained with three different methodologies. Discrepancies in carbon content estimations in forest stands with different age and composition obtained by different methods vary from 2.0 to 33.9%. The problem of reliable assessment of carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems of the Central Forest-Steppe requires regional approaches in development of assessment methods to provide precise results and minimize uncertainty of evaluations

Keywords:
phytomass, biological productivity, carbon sequestration, mixed forest stands

Text

Text (PDF): Read Download

References

1. Huang L., Zhou M., Ly J., Chen K. Trends in global research in forest carbon sequestration: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;252: 119908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119908.; ; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CVEUPN

2. Lin B., Ge J. Valued forest carbon sinks: How much emissions abatement costs could be reduced in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;224: 455-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.221.

3. Shu Sh., Zhu W., Wang W. et al. Effects of tree size heterogeneity on carbon sink in old forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 2019;432: 637-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.023.

4. Haenssgen M. J., Lechner A. M., Rakotonarivo S. et al. Implementation of the COP26 declaration to halt forest loss must safeguard and include Indigenous people. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2022;6: 235-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01650-6.

5. Schepaschenko D., Karminov V., See L. et al. Russian forest sequesters substantially more carbon than previously reported. Scientific Reports. 2021;11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92152-9.; ; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MBPVQX

6. Roxburgh S. H., Wood S. W., Mackey B. G. et al. Assessing the Carbon Sequestration Potential of Managed Forests: A Case Study from Temperate Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2006;43: 1149-1159.

7. Ramochnaya konvenciya OON ob izmenenii klimata. Oficial'nyy russkiy perevod. OON, 1992. 30 s.

8. Kiotskiy protokol k ramochnoy konvencii Organizacii Ob'edinennyh naciy ob izmenenii klimata. Oficial'nyy russkiy perevod. OON, 2005.

9. Shvidenko A. Z., Schepaschenko D. G. Uglerodnyy byudzhet lesov Rossii. Sibirskiy lesnoy zhurnal. 2014. № 1. S. 69-92.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SLRSSH

10. Zamolodchikov D. G., Grabovskiy V. I., Kraev G. N. Dinamika byudzheta ugleroda lesov Rossii za dva poslednih desyatiletiya. Lesovedenie. 2011. № 6. S. 16-28.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OKDVRT

11. Zamolodchikov D. G., Grabovskiy V. I., Korovin G. N. Upravlenie byudzhetom ugleroda lesov dal'nego vostoka Rossii: prognoznyy analiz po modeli CBM-CFS. Lesnaya taksaciya i lesoustroystvo. 2009. № 1 (41). S. 98-103.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RVMRGV

12. Zamolodchikov D. G., Grabovskiy V. I., Shulyak P. P., Chestnyh O. V. Vliyanie pozharov i zagotovok drevesiny na uglerodnyy balans lesov Rossii. Lesovedenie. 2013. № 5. S. 36-49.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RDUBAX

13. Korotkov V. N., Romanovskaya A. A., Karaban' R. T., Smirnov N. S. Ocenka uglerodnogo byudzheta lesov Rossii v ramkah otchetnosti po Kiotskomu protokolu. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa. Lesnoy vestnik. 2012. № 7. S. 58-64.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PCZRYB

14. Kurbatova A. I. Analiticheskiy obzor po sovremennym issledovaniyam izmeneniy bioticheskih sostavlyayuschih uglerodnogo cikla. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekologiya i bezopasnost' zhiznedeyatel'nosti. 2020. T. 28. № 4. S. 428-438.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2310-2020-28-4-428-438; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MPNWAF

15. Filipchuk A. N., Malysheva N. V., Moiseev B. N., Strahov V. V. Analiticheskiy obzor metodik ucheta vybrosov i pogloscheniya lesami parnikovyh gazov iz atmosfery. Lesohozyaystvennaya informaciya. 2016. № 3. S. 36-85.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WMDQSD

16. Mackey B., Moomaw W., Lindenmayer D., Keith H. Net carbon accounting and reporting are a barrier to understanding the mitigation value of forest protection in developed countries. Environmental Research Letters. 2022;17: 054028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01650-6.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac661b; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FOPSOY

17. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po kolichestvennomu opredeleniyu ob'ema pogloscheniya parnikovyh gazov. Utverzhdeny rasporyazheniem MPR RF ot 30.06.2017 № 20-r. URL: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/456079177.

18. Voronov M. P., Usol'cev V. A., Chasovskih V. P. Issledovanie metodov i razrabotka informacionnoy sistemy opredeleniya i kartirovaniya deponiruemogo lesami ugleroda v srede Natural. Ekaterinburg : UGLTU, 2012. 192 s.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UAPUHH

19. Chumachenko S. I., Palenova M. M., Korotkov V. N. Prognoz dinamiki taksacionnyh pokazateley lesnyh nasazhdeniy pri raznyh scenariyah vedeniya lesnogo hozyaystva: model' dinamiki lesnyh nasazhdeniy FORRUS-S. Ekologiya, monitoring i racional'noe prirodopol'zovanie. MGUL, 2001. Vyp. 314. S. 128-146.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YMPVNB

20. Usol'cev V. A. Fitomassa i pervichnaya produkciya lesov Evrazii. Ekaterinburg : URO RAN, 2010. 570 s.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SEVPFV

21. Usoltsev V. A., Tsepordey I. S., Zukow W. Carbon deposition by Russian forests on the example of taiga and forest-steppe zones. Ecological Questions. 2021;32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2021.023.; ; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VMHQSV

22. Usoltsev V. A., Shobairi S. O. R., Tsepordey I. S. Feedback Modelling of Natural Stand and Plantation Biomass to Changes in Climatic Factors (Temperatures and Precipitation): A Special Case for Two-needles Pines in Eurasia. Journal of Climate Change. 2020;6: 15-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JCC200009.; ; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WIAELA

23. Shvidenko A.Z., Shepaschenko D.G. Uglerodnyy byudzhet lesov Rossii. Sibirskiy lesnoy zhurnal. 2014. № 1. S. 69-92.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SLRSSH

24. Shvidenko A. Z., Schepaschenko D. G., Nil'sson S., Buluy Yu. I. Tablicy i modeli hoda rosta i produktivnosti nasazhdeniy osnovnyh lesoobrazuyuschih porod Severnoy Evrazii (normativno-spravochnye materialy). Izd. 2, dop. Moskva, 2008. 886 s.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FQDWDK

25. Schepaschenko D., Shvidenko A., See L. et al. A dataset of forest biomass structure for Eurasia. Scientific data. 2017;4: 170070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.70.; ; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XMZGOZ

26. Zamolodchikov D. G., Grabovskiy V. I., Kraev G. N. Dinamika byudzheta ugleroda lesov Rossii za dva poslednih desyatiletiya. Lesovedenie. 2011. № 6. S. 16-28.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OKDVRT

27. Usol'cev V. A. Biologicheskaya produktivnost' lesov Severnoy Evrazii. Ekaterinburg : URO RAN, 2007. 637 s.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SOESVT

28. Fedorov B. G., Moiseev B. N., Sinyak Yu. V. Pogloschayuschaya sposobnost' lesov Rossii i vybrosy uglekislogo gaza energeticheskimi ob'ektami. Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2011. № 3. S. 127-142.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OCPMUB

29. Moiseev B. N., Filipchuk A. N. Metodika MGEIK dlya rascheta godichnogo deponirovaniya ugleroda i ocenka ee primeneniya dlya lesov Rossii. Lesnoe hozyaystvo. 2009. № 4. S. 11-13.

30. Nazarenko A. E., Krasnoyarova B. A. Stoimostnaya ocenka ekosistemnyh uslug po deponirovaniyu ugleroda ekosistemami Altayskogo kraya kak sostavlyayuschaya perehoda k ustoychivomu razvitiyu. Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov. 2018. T. 4 (14). Vyp. 3. S. 89-99.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VJRVYE

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Submit manuscript Download PDF
Text

To cite

Citations:

Confirmation

Регистрация