Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
The goal is: based on the scientifically based concept of integrative legal understanding, synthesizing ontologically homogeneous legal regulators - the principles and norms of law, to explore debatable issues of the subject of legal regulation. The use of various methods of cognition of legal reality (dialectical-materialistic, general scientific and particular scientific) made it possible to distinguish between legal regulation and legal influence, to conclude that all social relations cannot be the subject of legal regulation, only one of their varieties acts as such, namely: legal relations; emphasize the dialectical relationship between legal and individual regulation of legal relations. A systematic analysis of legal regulators, as well as the actual behavior of participants in legal relations, makes it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of legal regulation and legal influence, to adjust the principles and norms of law in such a way that the proposed legal models find their real embodiment, the goals of legal regulation are achieved. and the development of actual legal relations, they are given special attention in the article. Digitalization expands the subject of legal regulation. The lack of a unified approach to understanding digital technologies and their gradations complicates the legal support of digital legal relations.
law, legal relationship, subject of legal regulation, legal impact, behavior of participants in legal relations
1. Alekseev S.S. Teoriya prava. - M.: Izdatel'stvo BEK, 1994. 311s.
2. Byudzhetnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 31.07.1998 № 145-FZ// SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
3. Ershov V. V. Pravootnosheniya: vozniknovenie i regulirovanie // Pravosudie. 2022. T. 4, № 1. S. 8-27.
4. Zakon RF ot 27.11.1992 № 4015-1 «O strahovanii»// SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
5. Kazancev M. F. Obscheteoreticheskie problemy ucheniya o predmete pravovogo regulirovaniya / M. F. Kazancev // Nauchnyy ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural'skogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2004. № 5. S. 420-447.
6. Miroshnik S. V. Osobennosti regulirovaniya i zaschity prav v cifrovom prostranstve / S. V. Miroshnik // Zhurnal yuridicheskih issledovaniy. 2022. T. 7, № 4. S. 30-36.
7. Nalogovyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii (chast' pervaya) ot 31.07.1998 № 146-FZ// SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
8. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po grazhdanskim delam Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 17.10.2022 № 58-KG22-9-K9// SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
9. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po grazhdanskim delam Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 12.07.2021 № 19-KGPR21-9-K5// SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
10. Opredelenie Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 30.05.2022 № 309-ES22-6869 po delu № A76-7395/2020// SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
11. Opredelenie Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 30.08.2021 № 303-ES21-14110 po delu № A51-22753/2019 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
12. Protasov V. N. Aktual'nye problemy teorii prava: chto i kak reguliruet pravo : uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov / V. N. Protasov. - Moskva : Izdatel'stvo Yurayt, 2020. 137 s.
13. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 18.03.2021 № 7-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti chasti 7 stat'i 7.32 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah v svyazi s zhaloboy obschestva s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu «Kompaniya Ladoga»// Oficial'nyy internet-portal pravovoy informacii http://pravo.gov.ru, 24.03.2021.
14. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 04.02.2020 № 7-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti punkta 1 primechaniy k stat'e 18.15 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah, chasti vtoroy stat'i 67 Trudovogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii i abzaca pervogo punkta 8 stat'i 13 Federal'nogo zakona «O pravovom polozhenii inostrannyh grazhdan v Rossiyskoy Federacii» v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanki A.A. Viktorovoy»// Oficial'nyy internet-portal pravovoy informacii http://www.pravo.gov.ru, 06.02.2020.
15. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 16.05.2017 № 16 (red. ot 26.12.2017) «O primenenii sudami zakonodatel'stva pri rassmotrenii del, svyazannyh s ustanovleniem proishozhdeniya detey»// SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
16. Regulirovanie pravootnosheniy: Monografiya. - M.: RGUP, 2020. 562 s.
17. Rekomendaciya № 198 Mezhdunarodnoy organizacii truda «O trudovom pravootnoshenii» [rus., angl.] (Prinyata v g. Zheneve 15.06.2006 na 95-oy sessii General'noy konferencii MOT)// SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
18. Svinin E. V. Ob'ekt i predmet pravovogo regulirovaniya kak komponenty strukturnoy organizacii pravoporyadka / E. V. Svinin // Lex Russica (Russkiy zakon). 2020. T. 73, № 1(158). S. 118-151.
19. Sil'chenko N.V. Problemy predmeta pravovogo regulirovaniya// Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2004. № 12. S. 61-64.
20. Solomko Z.V. Ponimanie pravootnosheniy: marksistskaya perspektiva// Pravo i politiki. 2022. № 9. S.9-19. https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=38703.
21. Sorokin V. D. Pravovoe regulirovanie: predmet, metod, process / V. D. Sorokin // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. 2000. № 4(231). S. 34-45.
22. Syryh V.M. Osnovy materialisticheskoy teorii prava. V 4 t. T. 1. Ob'ektivnoe pravo i formy ego vyrazheniya: monografiya. - M.: Yurlitinform, 2022. 568s.
23. Tamozhennyy kodeks Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza// SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
24. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik / pod red. V.V Ershova, otv. red. T.V Vlasova, T.S. Lesovaya. M.: RGUP, 2023. 464 s.
25. Federal'nyy zakon ot 15.12.2001 № 167-FZ «Ob obyazatel'nom pensionnom strahovanii v Rossiyskoy Federacii»// SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
26. Shagieva R.V. Predmet pravovogo regulirovaniya i ego rol' dlya sistemnogo osmysleniya prava// Uchenye trudy Rossiyskoy akademii advokatury i notariata. 2020. № 2(57). S. 59-65.
27. Etimologicheskie onlayn-slovari russkogo yazyka//https://lexicography.online/etymology/%D1%80/%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B3%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C.
