Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov (Department of Socio-Cultural Design and Development of Territories, Professor)
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
The relevance of the presented research is due to the emerging need for a quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of the implementation of the proposed national model of sustainable development EMCESG - Economic development - Market development - Climate adaptation - Environmental development - Social development - Governance development. The purpose of the work was to develop a criterion for assessing the effectiveness of the proposed model of sustainable development EMCESG. The novelty of the work lies in the fact that for the proposed model of sustainable development EMCESG, due to the multiplicity of indicators for assessing development in each of the six areas under consideration, a qualimetric model for assessing the effectiveness of sustainable development according to key indicators is proposed, simplifying the assessment process, on the one hand, and increasing the relevance of the information received, on the other side. The practical significance of the results obtained lies in the possibility of using the proposed qualimetric model for assessing the effectiveness of sustainable development of EMCESG according to key indicators at both the national and regional levels.
qualimetric model, performance assessment, sustainable development, EMCESG, key indicators
1. Government effectiveness - Country rankings. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/wb_government_effectiveness/
2. JAMES CHEN, Reviewed By GORDON SCOTT. What Are Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria? https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/environmental-social-and-governanceesg-criteria.asp.
3. New World Bank country classifications by income level: 2022-2023. https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new-world-bank-country-classifications-incomelevel-2022-2023
4. Babicheva N.E., Lyubushkin N.P., Chernova M.V. OCENKA USTOYChIVOGO RAZVITIYa EKONOMIChESKIH SISTEM. // Elektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie «Ustoychivoe innovacionnoe razvitie: proektirovanie i upravlenie» www.rypravlenie.ru tom 13 № 1 (34), 2017, st. 6, str. 83-90.
5. Borodin S.N. Model' ocenki ustoychivogo razvitiya regiona na osnove indeksnogo metoda. // Ekonomika regiona. 2023. № 19(1). S. 45-59.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-4; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EQNGER
6. Garipov R.I., Garipova E.N. K VOPROSU OB OCENKE USTOYChIVOGO RAZVITIYa REGIONAL'NOY EKONOMIChESKOY SISTEMY. // Upravlenie v sovremennyh sistemah. 2013, №1, s.29-43.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RZMBFT
7. Golovanov E.B. Metodicheskiy podhod v ocenke ustoychivogo razvitiya regional'noy ekonomiki // Sovremennye tehnologii upravleniya. ISSN 22269339. — №3 (51). Nomer stat'i: 5104. Data publikacii: 08.03.2015. Rezhim dostupa: https://sovman.ru/article/5104/
8. GUMANITARNYE ISSLEDOVANIYa. HTTPS:// GTMARKET.RU/RESEARCH/?YSCLID=LT7A4MQYQ5310149375
9. Zenkina E.V. Sovremennye podhody k ocenke ustoychivogo razvitiya stran // Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo». 2021. № 2. S. 111-125.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2021-2-111-125; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LBLCTN
10. Indikatory i indeksy ustoychivogo razvitiya. https://web.archive.org/web/20120716043247/http://www.cosd.ru/index.php?option=c om_content&view=article&id=13&Itemid=15
11. Kornilova E.V., Zaharov V.Ya., Kornilov D.A. E OCENKA USTOYChIVOGO RAZVITIYa I FORMIROVANIE REYTINGA USTOYChIVOSTI REGIONOV STRANY. // Razvitie i bezopasnost' 2023 №1, s.36-49.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46960/2713-2633_2023_1_36; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TARGFA
12. Kuznecova E.Yu., Kuznecov S.V. Ocenka ustoychivogo razvitiya promyshlennogo predpriyatiya. // Vestnik UrFU. Seriya ekonomika i upravlenie. 2019 Tom 18. № 2. S. 186–209.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2019.18.2.010; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZKSQST
13. Markov B. E. Tipologiya metodov diagnostiki ustoychivogo razvitiya // Aktual'nye issledovaniya. 2021. №52 (79). S. 59-63.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KMDZCR
14. Rudenko L.G., Egorova N.N. METODOLOGIChESKIY PODHOD K OCENKE UROVNYa USTOYChIVOGO RAZVITIYa REGIONOV. // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta imeni S.Yu. Vitte. Seriya I. Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2022. № 4 (43), s. 62-72.
15. Salimova T.A., Gudkova D.D. Instrumentariy ocenki ustoychivogo razvitiya organizacii // Nauchno-tehnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Ekonomicheskie nauki. 2017. T. 10, № 5. S. 151—160.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.10514; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZTSZBL
16. Tebekin A.V. KRITERIY KOLIChESTVENNOY OCENKI PERSPEKTIV STRATEGIChESKOGO RAZVITIYa, FORMIRUEMOGO NA OSNOVE MODELI VNUTRENNIH KORPORATIVNYH INICIATIV. // Zhurnal issledovaniy po upravleniyu. 2023. T. 9. № 6. S. 3-17.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PEYYSL
17. Tebekin A.V. OBOSNOVANIE PODHODA K RAZRABOTKE KRITERIEV OCENKI EFFEKTIVNOSTI USTOYChIVOGO RAZVITIYa SOCIAL'NOEKONOMIChESKIH SISTEM. // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2022. № 4. S. 51-57.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.52375/20728689_2022_4_51; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FQJWJB
18. Tebekin A.V. TEORETIKO-METODOLOGIChESKIY ANALIZ EKONOMIChESKIH REFORM E. GAYDARA (ChAST' 3: ANALIZ SODERZhANIYa BLOKA REFORM "NORMALIZACII FINANSOV I PODAVLENIE INFLYaCII"). // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2022. № 4 (60). S. 229-247.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.26456/2219-1453/2022.4.229-247; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DVGNKR
19. Tebekin A.V., Kusch A.I., Lomakin O.E. RAZVITIE NOVOY NACIONAL'NOY MODELI USTOYChIVOGO RAZVITIYa HOZYaYSTVUYuSchIH SUB'EKTOV: NEOBHODIMOST' PEREHODA OT ESG K EMSESG. // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2022. № 3. S. 8-16.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.52375/20728689_2022_3_8; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TQYXOI
20. Tebekin A.V., Lomakin O.E. KRITERII EFFEKTIVNOSTI MEROPRIYaTIY PO ADAPTACII NACIONAL'NOGO HOZYaYSTVA K IZMENENIYaM KLIMATA. // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. 2022. № 11 (95). S. 40-55.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.52957/22213260_2022_11_40; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AILUPJ
21. Tebekin A.V., Lomakin O.E. FORMIROVANIE SISTEMY KRITERIEV OCENKI EFFEKTIVNOSTI ADAPTACII NACIONAL'NYH, REGIONAL'NYH I OTRASLEVYH STRUKTUR K KLIMATIChESKIM IZMENENIYaM. // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2022. № 5. S. 7-13.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.52375/20728689_2022_5_7; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZLOSNK
22. Tebekin A.V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N.V., Horeva A.V. BUDUSchEE OBSchESTVENNOY I ChASTNOY SOBSTVENNOSTI V USLOVIYaH SOVREMENNYH PROIZVODSTVENNO-TEHNOLOGIChESKIH I SOCIAL'NO-EKONOMIChESKIH TRANSFORMACIY (V ChASTI MATERIAL'NOGO PROIZVODSTVA). // Vestnik Moskovskogo finansovoyuridicheskogo universiteta MFYuA. 2021. № 3. S. 7-16.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.52210/2224669X_2021_3_7; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VJSYVG
23. Tebekin A.V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N.V., Horeva A.V. TEORETIChESKAYa MODEL' NOVOGO INDUSTRIAL'NOGO OBSchESTVA VTOROGO POKOLENIYa I PROBLEMY PRAKTIChESKOGO VOPLOSchENIYa NOONOMIKI. // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. 2021. № 3 (75). S. 59-70.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UDZMIY
24. Tebekin A.V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N.V., Horeva A.V. UPRAVLENIE USTOYChIVYM RAZVITIEM TERRITORIY: MODELI REALIZACII I KRITERII OCENKI EFFEKTIVNOSTI. V sbornike: Problemy upravleniya social'no-ekonomicheskim razvitiem regionov Rossii v novyh realiyah. Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. Orel, 2023. S. 270-279.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DJHTQT
25. Tret'yakova E.A., Alferova T.V., Petuhova Yu.I. Analiz metodicheskogo instrumentariya ocenki ustoychivogo razvitiya promyshlennyh predpriyatiy. // VESTNIK PERMSKOGO UNIVERSITETA. EKONOMIKA. 2015, Vyp. 4(27), s.132-139.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VBSKLN
26. Ustoychivoe razvitie: Metodologiya i metodiki izmereniya: ucheb. posobie/ S.N. Bobylev, N. V. Zubarevich, S. V. Solov'eva, Yu. S. Vlasov; pod red. S. N. Bobyleva. — M.: Ekonomika, 2011. — 358 s.; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XVTMUJ
