COGNITIVE POSSIBILITIES OF POLITICAL SCIENCE: ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT RUSSIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The purpose of the work is to raise the question of the cognitive capabilities of political science and to what extent, in this regard, the methodological tools of political science are an adequate means for studying Russian reality. The methodology of the research was a politico-philosophical approach, which used a retrospective method and discourse analysis. The specificity of the social sciences and humanities implies the existence of value positions of the subject of cognition and determines the practice-oriented orientation of his research activity. The model of reality reconstructed by the scientist is based on a value-colored picture of the world, which directly or implicitly influences the interpretation of facts. Political science, being a part of social and humanitarian knowledge, is not devoid of its specificity and is also based on a certain model of the worldview - a paradigm. The science of politics was formed in the bosom of Western society, taking as a basis the corresponding paradigm of thinking. At a certain point, comparative studies begins to occupy a central position in the study of politics, in fact identifying the whole of political science with itself. Its distinctive feature, which has not been overcome to this day, is the attitude to compare the entire diversity of the political world with its own "ideal" of due. Accordingly, everything that does not fit into this value picture of the world is recognized as hostile, backward, imperfect. On such paradigmatic grounds, the study of Russian political life has been carried out for a long time. By adopting such a way of explaining the political sphere of Russian society, we put ourselves in the position of catching up, trying to adjust our own reality to the standards that were formed in other cultural and historical conditions. Based on this, the question arises about the application of the methodology of political science to Russian conditions. Conclusions: the question posed in the work may affect the change of the paradigm in force in Russian political science or, at least, the clarification of its methodological foundations, which opens up a wide scope for research for domestic social scientists.

Keywords:
methodology, worldview, paradigm, political science, comparative studies, political philosophy, cognitive capabilities of political science
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Abramov A.V. Nezapadnaya politologiya_ nacionalnie nauchnie shkoli [Non-western political science: national scientific schools]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta _elektronnii jurnal [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University (e-journal)]. 2021, V. 4, pp. 8-24. (In Russian).

2. Bagdasaryan V.E. Matricy obshchestvennogo soznaniya [Matrices of public consciousness]. M., Our Tomorrow, 2021, 416 p. (In Russian).

3. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. Preodolevaya metodologicheskie razlichiya: spory o poznanii politiki v epohu neopredelennosti [Overcoming methodological differences: disputes about the knowledge of politics in an era of uncertainty]. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Political studies]. 2019, V. 5, pp. 19-42. (In Russian).

4. Dugin A. Chetvertaya politicheskaya teoriya. Rossiya i politicheskie idei XXI veka [The fourth political theory. Russia and the political ideas of the XXI century]. St. Petersburg, Amphora, 2009, 343 p. (In Russian).

5. Zhukotskaya A.V. Razmyshleniya o sovremennoj gumanitaristike [Reflections on modern humanitarianism]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: «Istoricheskie nauki» [Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series: "Historical Sciences"]. 2021, V. 1, pp. 89-91. (In Russian).

6. Ilyin M.V., Smorgunov L.V. Sravnitel'naya politologiya [Comparative political science]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political science]. 2001, V. 2, pp. 109-145. (In Russian).

7. Karaje T.V. Politicheskaya filosofiya [Political philosophy]. M., Mysl, 2007, 512 p. (In Russian).

8. Crouch K. Postdemokratiya [Postdemocracy]. M., HSE Publishing House, 2023, 192 p. (In Russian).

9. Linz H. Totalitarnye i avtoritarnye rezhimy [Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes]. Neprikosnovennyj zapas [Inviolable reserve]. 2018, V. 4, pp. 16-62. (In Russian).

10. Mikeshina L.A. Filosofiya nauki: Sovremennaya epistemologiya. Nauchnoe znanie v dinamike kul'tury. Metodologiya nauchnogo issledovaniya [Philosophy of science: Modern epistemology. Scientific knowledge in the dynamics of culture. Methodology of scientific research]. M., Progress-Tradition, MPSI, Flint, 2005, 464 p. (In Russian).

11. Nalivkina N.V. Demokraticheskie perekhody i neudacha demokraticheskogo tranzita Rossii [Democratic transitions and the failure of democratic transit in Russia]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tomsk State Pedagogical University]. 2006, V. 12, pp. 83-88. (In Russian).

12. Porus V.N. Politicheskaya sub"ektnost' nauki kak tema filosofii nauki [Political subjectivity of science as a topic of philosophy of science]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy]. 2023, V. 9, pp. 71-82. (In Russian).

13. Sartori D. Iskazhenie konceptov v sravnitel'noj politologii (I) [Distortion of concepts in comparative political science (I)]. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Political studies]. 2003, V. 3, pp. 67-77. (In Russian).

14. Silakova I.V. Enciklopediya metodologij politicheskoj nauki [Encyclopedia of political science methodologies]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy]. 2019, V. 8, pp. 207-214. (In Russian).

15. Sovremennaya politicheskaya nauka. Metodologiya [Modern political science. Methodology] / [T.A. Alekseeva et al.]; ed. by O.V. Gaman-Golutvin, A.I. Nikitin. – 2nd ed., ispr. and additional M., Aspect Press, 2019, 773 p. (In Russian).

16. Tulchinsky G.L. Tri narrativa politicheskoj nauki: perspektivy mezhdisciplinarnosti politicheskih issledovanij [Three narratives of political science: prospects for the interdisciplinarity of political research]. Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS [Political expertise: POLITEX]. 2019, V. 2, pp. 20-46. (In Russian).

17. Fursov A.I. Russkaya vlast', istoriya Evrazii i mirovaya sistema: mobilis in mobile (social'naya filosofiya russkoj vlasti) [Russian power, the history of Eurasia and the world system: mobilis in mobile (social philosophy of Russian power)]. Kontury global'nyh transformacij: politika, ekonomika, pravo [Contours of global transformations: politics, economics, law]. 2008, V. 6, pp. 10-81. (In Russian).

18. Chikagskaya shkola politicheskoj mysli (1920-1940-e gody): sbornik perevodov [Chicago School of Political Thought (1920s-1940s): collection of translations] / edited by D.V. Efremenko. M., INION RAS, 2023, 284 p. (In Russian).

19. Chto ostaetsya ot gosudarstva v epohu neoliberalizma? : monografiya [What remains of the state in the era of neoliberalism? : monograph] / edited by K. Beshe-Golovko, M.-E. Boduen, K.V. Karpenko. M., Blok-Print, 2023, 144 p. (In Russian).

20. Shabrov O.F. Politologiya − gosudarstvennym sluzhashchim [Political science-to a civil servant]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Public service]. 2002, V. 1, pp. 96-98. (In Russian).

21. Yakunin V.I., Kara-Murza S.G., Vershinin A.A., Kamensky A.V. Lekcii po politologii [Lectures on political science]. M., Scientific expert, 2014, 304 p. (In Russian).

22. Almond Gabriel A. Ventures in Political Science. Narratives and reflections, Colorado: Lynne-Rienner Publishers, 2002, 240 p.

23. Schmitter Ph. The Nature and Future of Comparative Politics, European Political Science Review, 2009. Vol. 1, pp. 33-61.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?