Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Financial condition is the most important characteristic of the economic activity of business entities. Therefor in domestic theory and practice there is a search for methods and models that make it possible to predict the bankruptcy of organizations with sufficient accuracy. The article discusses the methods used in the practice of economic entities of the Russian Federation for assessing the likelihood of bankruptcy. As an innovation, an innovative crisis management mechanism is proposed — an autogenic crisis and its practical tool based on stress testing of enterprises in the real sector of the economy. To effectively manage crisis situations, it is recommended to develop a Federal Auditing Standard with a unified set of indicators that allow assessing the likelihood of insolvency (bankruptcy) of the audited organizations. In addition to financial indicators, it is proposed to include in the set of such indicators reflecting the operational and investment activities of business entities.
Financial condition, insolvency, bankruptcy, liquidity, crisis, autogenic crisis, stress testing
1. Federal'nyy zakon ot 30.12.2008 № 307-FZ «Ob auditorskoy deyatel'nosti» // https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_83311/
2. Federal'nyy zakon ot 26.10.2002 № 127-FZ «O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve)» // https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_39331/
3. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 25.06.2003 № 367 «Ob utverzhdenii Pravil provedeniya arbitrazhnym upravlyayuschim finansovogo analiza» // https://base.garant.ru/12131539/
4. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 27.12.2004 № 855 «Ob utverzhdenii Vremennyh pravil proverki arbitrazhnym upravlyayuschim nalichiya priznakov fiktivnogo i prednamerennogo bankrotstva» // https://base.garant.ru/187738/
5. Prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii ot 21.04.2006 № 104 «Ob utverzhdenii Metodiki provedeniya Federal'noy nalogovoy sluzhboy ucheta i analiza finansovogo sostoyaniya i platezhesposobnosti strategicheskih predpriyatiy i organizaciy» // https://base.garant.ru/12147934/
6. Prikaz Minfina Rossii ot 06.05.1999 № 32n «Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya po buhgalterskomu uchetu «Rashody organizacii» PBU 10/99» // https://base.garant.ru/12115838/
7. Prikaz Minfina Rossii ot 06.05.1999 № 33n «Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya po buhgalterskomu uchetu «Dohody organizacii» PBU 9/99» // https://base.garant.ru/12115839/
8. Prikaz FSFO RF ot 23.01.2001 № 16 «Ob utverzhdenii «Metodicheskih ukazaniy po provedeniyu analiza finansovogo sostoyaniya organizaciy» // https://base.garant.ru/183056/
9. Berezinec I.V., Bobyleva A.Z., Il'ina Yu.B. Veroyatnost' bankrotstva: dostoverny li modeli prognozirovaniya? // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyy vestnik. — 2022. — № 94. — S. 68–83.
10. Devyatkin O.V. Autogennyy krizis kak konceptual'naya model' sistemnyh izmeneniy // Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G.V. Plehanova. — 2019. — № 2(104). — S. 182–190.
11. Devyatkin O.V. Korporativnye bankrotstva i krizisy: analiz i tendencii // Ekonomika, predprinimatel'stvo i pravo. — 2023. — T. 13. — № 7. — S. 2329–2340.
12. Devyatkin O.V. Stress-testirovanie kak instrument upravleniya krizisnymi situaciyami v organizaciyah // Liderstvo i menedzhment. — 2023. — T. 10. — № 1. — S. 81–92.
13. Makarov A.S. K probleme vybora kriteriev analiza sostoyatel'nosti organizacii // Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika. — 2008. — № 23.
14. Jardin P. Predicting Bankruptcy Using Neural Networks and Other Classification Methods: The Influence of Variable Selection Techniques on Model Accuracy // Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Time Series Prediction. Helsinki University of Technology, Porvoo, Finland. 2010. P. 271–284.
