THE PRINCIPLE OF THE RULE OF LAW AS A BASIS FOR LIMITING THE DISCRETIONARY POWERS OF GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article explores the importance of the rule of law principle for limiting the discretionary powers of government agencies. The author establishes the non-identity of two related legal categories: discretion and discretionary powers, as well as the absence in the legal literature of references 
to specific legal means designed to ensure the rule of law in the exercise of discretionary powers 
by authorized state bodies. It is concluded that the goals and principles of legal regulation 
to be applied in the case should be considered as the indicated legal means aimed at limiting 
the discretionary powers of public authorities.

Keywords:
rule of law, discretion, discretionary powers, principles of law, objectives of legal regulation
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Alekseev S.S. Sobranie sochineniy. V 10 t. Tom 8. M.: Statut, 2010. S. 26, 29.

2. Allan T. Svoboda, Ravenstvo, Zakonnost' // Doktriny Pravovogo Gosudarstva i Verhovenstva Prava v sovremennom mire: sb. st. / otv. red. V.D. Zor'kin, P.D. Barenboym. M.: LUM: Yusticinform, 2013. S. 396–419.

3. Berg L.N. Sudebnoe usmotrenie i ego predely: obscheteoreticheskiy aspekt. Ekaterinburg, 2008. 23 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RAVBNH

4. Boyko D.V. Zakonnost' i usmotrenie v pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti: voprosy teorii. Volgograd, 2011. 32 s.

5. Berezin A.A. Predely pravoprimenitel'nogo usmotreniya: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2007. 26 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NIWIRV

6. Vlasenko N.A. Konkretizaciya v prave: metodologicheskie osnovy issledovaniya // 
Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 7. S. 60–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/4825; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SIENAV

7. Vlasenko N.A. Kategorii «neopredelennost'» i «opredelennost'» v issledovanii sovremennogo prava /Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Ros., 2017. № 1 (37).S.8–17.

8. Valiev R.G. Institucional'no-pravovye osnovaniya obschepravovoy modeli diskrecionnyh polnomochiy // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2020. № 5. Dostup iz SPS «GARANT». DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.114.5.011-018; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PPVRCB

9. Vinogradov V.A. Pravovoe gosudarstvo i verhovenstvo prava: doktriny, konkurenciya yurisdikciy, obespechenie pravovoy svobody. Pozicii Konstitucionnogo Suda RF 
v otnoshenii pravovogo gosudarstva // Doktriny Pravovogo Gosudarstva i Verhovenstva Prava v sovremennom mire: sb. st. / otv. red. V.D. Zor'kin, P.D. Barenboym. M.: 
LUM: Yusticinform, 2013. S. 373–395.

10. Gracheva Yu.V. Sudeyskoe usmotrenie v realizacii ugolovno-pravovyh norm: problemy zakonotvorchestva, teorii i praktiki: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk.M.,2011. 38 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZOKLBX

11. Daysi A.V. Osnovy gosudarstvennogo prava Anglii: Vvedenie v izuchenie angliyskoy konstitucii / per., dop. po 6-mu angl. izd. O.V. Poltorackoy / pod red. P.G. Vinogradova. 2-e izd. M., 1907. 695 s.

12. Demin A.V. Diskreciya v nalogovom prave // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2017. Vyp. 35. C. 42–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2017-35-42-55. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YNBRPJ

13. Davydov K.V. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnyh procedurah. Proekt Federal'nogo zakona 
«Ob administrativnyh procedurah i administrativnyh aktah v Rossiyskoy Federacii» // Zhurnal administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva. 2017. № 1. S. 47–66. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YIEHZV

14. Zavgorodnyaya A.A. Spravedlivoe sootnoshenie chastnyh i publichnyh interesov i proporcional'nost' // Aktual'nye problemy gosudarstva i prava. Tom 7. 2023. № 4 (28). S. 471–481.

15. Zaloilo M.V. Ponyatie i formy konkretizacii yuridicheskih norm: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M, 2011. 21 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QHQLAJ

16. Ignat'ev A.S. Usmotrenie kak pravovaya obscheteoreticheskaya kategoriya i algoritm ego otraslevogo analiza (na primere sfery sudebnogo konstitucionnogo kontrolya): 
diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Spb., 2015. 26 s.

17. Korablina O.V. Usmotrenie v pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti: obscheteoreticheskiy i nravstvenno-pravovoy aspekty: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2009. 23 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZNXTPT

18. Kirillova A.D. Diskrecionnye polnomochiya v pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2017. № 2-2. S. 81–87. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZEVXHJ

19. Kapicyn V.M. Gosudarstvennaya diskreciya kak problema konstitucionnogo prava // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo // Zhurnal izd-va «Yurist». 2006. № 3. S. 1–13.

20. Markov P.V. Pravovaya priroda i usloviya osuschestvleniya sudebnogo usmotreniya: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2012. 30 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QHYESP

21. Matuzov N.I. Esche raz o principe «ne zapreschennoe zakonom dozvoleno» // Pravovedenie. 1999. № 3. S. 14–32. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TTGNKH

22. Presnyakov M.V. Diskrecionnye polnomochiya i pravovaya opredelennost' // Vlast'. 2013. S. 163–166.

23. Presnyakov M.V. Problema «kachestva zakona» kak trebovanie verhovenstva prava // Grazhdanin i pravo. 2009. № 12. Dostup iz SPS «GARANT». EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NYJNYV

24. Pronin K.V. Diskrecionnye polnomochiya suda v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Chelyabinsk, 2010. 26 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QGXCJD

25. Papkova O.A. Sudeyskoe usmotrenie v grazhdanskom processe: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1997. 31 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NLIIQN

26. Solovey Yu.P. Principy osuschestvleniya publichnoy administraciey diskrecionnyh polnomochiy // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2018. № 7. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UTNPWY

27. Skudarnov A.S. Usmotrenie v processe realizacii prav, svobod i obyazannostey grazhdan: i ih ob'edineniy: diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnoyarsk, 2014. 211 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SVBKKJ

28. Fastov A.G., Boyko D.V. Special'no-yuridicheskie garantii obespecheniya zakonnosti 
v diskrecionnom pravoprimenenii // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. № 2 (25). S. 15–22. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QIPKFF

29. Chirkin V.E. Verhovenstvo prava: sovremennye varianty terminologii // 
Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 12. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/16624; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VHEOHV

30. Bradley A.W., Ewing K.D. Constitutional and administrative law. 14th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2007. 827 p.

31. Bingham T. The Rule of Law. L., 2010. 215 p.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?