employee from 01.01.2012 until now
Russian Federation
Today, stress has become a part of employees’ everyday lives in virtually any organization. It affects well-being, productivity, and even staff retention. As a result, more and more companies are striving to identify and reduce employee stress levels in order to foster a healthy and sustainable work environment. To achieve this, it is crucial to use reliable stress assessment methods. This article presents an overview of 31 different questionnaires and tests that help assess how employees experience stress, their resilience to workload, the sources of tension, and how they cope with challenges. All methods are categorized according to their primary goals: some evaluate current emotional states, others measure burnout or self-regulation ability, and still others focus on corporate culture and working conditions. The article also offers recommendations on which methods are most appropriate for various situations, such as recruitment, teamwork, risk assessment, or designing psychological support programs. This makes the article valuable for HR professionals, psychologists, managers, and anyone interested in improving employee well-being and reducing workplace stress.
stress, stress assessment, burnout, stress resilience, diagnostic methods, adaptation, HR management, psychological well-being
1. Bandura A. Samoeffektivnost': osuschestvlenie kontrolya [Tekst] = Self Efficacy: The Exercise of Control / A. Bandura. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997. — 604 p.
2. Boyko V.V. Energiya emociy v obschenii: vzglyad na sebya i na drugih [Tekst] / V. V. Boyko. — SPb.: Piter, 2016. — 368 s.
3. Gromova E.V. Metody diagnostiki stressa v korporativnoy srede [Tekst] / E.V. Gromova, S.A. Petrov // Sovremennyy HR. — 2021. — № 2. — S. 12–25.
4. Ivanov A.A. Psihologicheskoe blagopoluchie sotrudnikov: teoreticheskiy obzor [Tekst] / A. A. Ivanov // Psihologiya truda i upravleniya. — 2019. — T. 15. — № 1. — S. 8–19.
5. Zigrist Y. Stress i biomarkery: model' disbalansa usiliy i voznagrazhdeniya [Tekst] = Work stress and altered biomarkers: a synthesis of findings based on the effort–reward imbalance model / Y. Zigrist, Dzh. Li // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022, vol. 19(12), pp. 7221. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127221 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LLMFQX
6. Karvozis N. Organizacionnyy stress i proizvoditel'nost' truda [Tekst] = Organizational stress and labor productivity / N. Karvozis, P. de Yannis // International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2018, vol. 24,i. 4, pp. 467–478.
7. Koen S. Global'naya shkala vosprinimaemogo stressa [Tekst] = A global measure of perceived stress / S. Koen, T. Kamark, R. Mermelsteyn // Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1983, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 385–396. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
8. Lazarus R.S. Stress, ocenka i sovladanie [Tekst] = Stress, Appraisal, and Coping / R.S. Lazarus, S. Folkman. New York: Springer, 1984. 456 p.
9. Lebedeva I.N. Rezilientnost' kak faktor adaptacii personala v usloviyah stressa [Tekst] / I.N. Lebedeva // Upravlenie personalom. — 2022. — № 4. — S. 30–42.
10. Potemkin V.V. Koping strategii: klassifikaciya i ocenka [Tekst] / V.V. Potemkin // Psihologicheskiy zhurnal. — 2020. — № 5. — S. 88–97.
11. Frolova L.S. Eticheskie aspekty primeneniya psihodiagnostiki v HR-praktike [Tekst] / L.S. Frolova // Psihologiya upravleniya. — 2021. — № 2. — S. 55–66.
12. Chekmarev P.A. Adaptaciya zarubezhnyh metodik diagnostiki stressa k rossiyskoy praktike [Tekst] / P.A. Chekmarev // Korporativnaya psihologiya. — 2023. № 1. — S. 15–29.
13. Sharma P. Samoeffektivnost' i stress: sovremennyy obzor [Tekst] = Self Efficacy and its Role in Coping with Stress: A Contemporary Review / P. Sharma // Journal of Research in Psychology. 2023, vol. 11(1), pp. 45–58.
14. Shvarcer R. Samoeffektivnost' i zdorov'e: modeli i podhody [Tekst] = Self efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: theoretical approaches and a new model / R. Shvarcer // Health Psychology Research. 2021, vol. 9(2), pp. 17–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4081/hpr.2021.9982
