Russian Federation
Communication between science and society in the era of the digital revolution poses new challenges for researchers. In particular, linguistics must take into account the contemporary view of the philosophy of science and the media status of scientific communication. In this regard, the purpose of this article is to review the current vectors of consideration of scientificmedia interdiscursivity. Analysis and synthesis of foreign and domestic concepts of science-society interaction allow us to speak of a new linguistic parameter in this sphere of communication: the categorical situation of ‘Post-Truth.’ A number of its key communicative features have been identified. Among them is the formation of a meaning-forming institution that has received the philosophical definition of ‘digital Leviathan’ (AI, neural networks). The machine approach to the semantic unity of ‘Truth/Falsehood’ (as a binary code ‘0/1’) separates scientific Truth from Knowledge as such and makes it dependent on the synchronising parameter ‘Contemporaneity’. In the trinity of scientific communication models ‘Deficit – Dialogue Participation’ this leads to a number of consequences. Science is ‘depressurised’ in favour of the media communication roles of scientists under the influence of the iconicity of the virtual environment, while the audience loses the ability to think dialectically, receiving content in accordance with their own preferences. This type of dialogue is accurately called ‘imitative-conventional’ by researchers. In our opinion, the main methodological conclusion of linguistics in this regard should be to pay attention to the epistemic modality of popular science statements, to the new pragmatics of delimiters and quantifiers ‘True/False’.
communication between science and society, media coverage of scientific communication, interdiscursivity of science and media, categorical situation of ‘Post-Truth’, epistemic modality
1. Astahova A.S. Publichnaya reprezentaciya professional'nogo soobschestva: populyarizaciya nauki i obschestvennye debaty [Tekst] / A.S. Astahova // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. — 2013. — T. 37. — № 3. — S. 179–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201337337
2. Bondarko A.V. Modal'nost' v sisteme kategorial'nyh edinstv [Tekst] / A.V. Bondarko // Modal'nost' v yazyke i rechi: novye podhody k izucheniyu: sb. nauch. tr. Kaliningrad: Izd-vo RGU im. I. Kanta, 2008. — S. 21–34. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YKHOMH
3. Boldin P.N. Semioticheskiy podhod k resheniyu problemy statusa teoreticheskogo znaniya [Tekst] / P.N. Boldin // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: Sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 20–22. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BBZNMT
4. Golubinskaya A.V. Formy fiksacii neopredelennosti v nauke, ili chto obschego u ekologicheskogo krizisa i kriticheskogo myshleniya [Tekst] / A.V. Golubinskaya // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: Sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 23–27. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BOUBFJ
5. Dorozhkin A.M. Situacii neopredelennosti v epistemologicheskom konstruktivizme [Tekst] / A.M. Dorozhkin // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: Sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 27–30.
6. Zharov A.M. Dinamika znaniy: evolyucionnyy analiz teoriy nauchnogo razvitiya [Tekst] / A.M. Zharov // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya. — 2024. — № 80. — S. 34–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/80/3; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HCQXAE
7. Zharov A.M. Metafora kak faktor evolyucionnoy izmenchivosti nauchnyh teoriy [Tekst] / A.M. Zharov // Antinomii. — 2024. — T. 24. — № 2. — S. 7–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17506/26867206_2024_24_2_7; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FTHNAD
8. Zaladina M.V. Utopiya kak poisk chelovekom vyhoda iz situacii otchuzhdeniya [Tekst] / M.V. Zaladina // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: Sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 245–247. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ILBGXY
9. Ischenko E.N. Teoriya i praktika v kontekste vizual'nyh issledovaniy: istoriya i sovremennost' [Tekst] / E.N. Ischenko // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: Sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 247–250. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NMXLBL
10. Kasavin I.T. Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: sbornik nauchnyh statey [Tekst] / I.T. Kasavin, N.A. Yastreb, L.V. Shapovalova. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — 939 s.
11. Keosidi I.I. Primenimost' koncepcii «vychislitel'nogo leviafana» v kontekste algoritmizacii upravleniya social'nymi processami [Tekst] / I.I. Keosidi // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: Sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 253–257. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HTHSEQ
12. Krut'ko D.Yu. Eksperiment v sovremennom nauchnom diskurse: klasternyy metod i status real'nosti [Tekst] / D.Yu. Krut'ko // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: Sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 38–41. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HZYQJM
13. Miloslavov A.S. Raspredelennoe znanie, kak sfera kollektivnoy otvetstvennosti nauchnogo soobschestva: kommunikativnyy aspekt [Tekst] / A.S. Miloslavov // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: Sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 674–677. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HMKZNB
14. Pogozhina N.N. Kommunikativnye i epistemologicheskie usloviya proizvodstva i rasprostraneniya nauchnogo znaniya v sovremennosti [Tekst] / N.N. Pogozhina // Informaciya Kommunikaciya — Obschestvo. — 2025. — T. 1. — S. 352–355. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DUTULO
15. Pogozhina N.N. Normativnost' nauchnoy istiny: analiz sovremennyh konvenciy [Tekst] / N.N. Pogozhina // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: Sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 908–910. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QMPXWW
16. Pogozhina N.N. Progress v sociogumanitarnoy perspektive [Tekst] / N.N. Pogozhina; pod red. O.E. Stolyarovoy // Voprosy filosofii. — 2024. — № 5. — S. 219–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-5-219-221; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ISXFLX
17. Pred'yavlenie nauchnogo znaniya v dialoge media: konteksty, tehnologii i yazykovye tehniki: Kollektivnaya monografiya [Tekst] / L.R. Duskaeva [i dr.]. — SPb.: Mediapapir, 2023. — 223 s.
18. Rysakova P.I. Strategii nauchnoy populyarizacii v cifrovoy mediasrede [Tekst] / P.I. Rysakova // Medialingvistika. — 2022. — T. 9. — № 4. — S. 309–329. — DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2022.402 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UVFZQG
19. Sokolova T.D. Epistemicheskaya nespravedlivost': dva vzglyada na nauchnuyu kommunikaciyu [Tekst] / T.D. Sokolova // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. — 2025. — T. 62. № 2. — S. 56–63. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202562221 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/REYUMT
20. Suslov I.V. Fenomen inakomysliya v kommunikativnoy paradigme Yurgena Habermasa [Tekst] / I.V. Suslov // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 298–301. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GICLCB
21. Curkan E.G. Modeli kommunikacii nauki v obschestve: deficit, dialog, uchastie [Tekst] / E.G. Curkan // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. — 2025. — T. 62. — № 2. S. 19–31. — DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5840/eps202562217 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OQRUOF
22. Chernikova I.V. O vliyanii nauki na kul'turnye kody cifrovoy epohi [Tekst] / I.V. Chernikova // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. S. 53–57. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GUCSKG
23. Shaposhnikova Yu.V. Filosofiya i obschestvo: potrebnost' v dialoge i problema kommunikacii [Tekst] / Yu.V. Shaposhnikova // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoychivom mire: sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 715–718. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LSDVRP
24. Shipovalova L.V. Publichnaya nauchnaya kommunikaciya problema konceptual'noy neopredelennosti [Tekst] /L.V. Shipovalova // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoĭchivom mire: sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 718–721. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IZBAWQ
25. Elbakyan A.A. Tehnologii otkrytogo dostupa k nauchnym znaniyam: cennostnoĭ aspekt [Tekst] / A.A. Elbakyan // Nauka, tehnologii i cennosti v neustoĭchivom mire: sb. nauchn. st. — M.: Russkoe obschestvo istorii i filosofii nauki, 2024. — S. 60–64. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QDRGIF
26. Bucchi M., Trench B. Science Communication Research: Themes and Challenges, in: Bucchi M., Trench B. (eds.) Routledge Hand book of Public Communication of Science and Technology. New York: Routledge, 2014, no. 2, pp. 1–14.
27. Bucchi M., Trench B. Science Communication and Science in Society: A Conceptual Review in Ten Keywords, Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 2016, no. 7 (2), pp. 151–168.
28. Luhmann N. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag. 1998.
29. Iyengar S., Massey D. S. (2019). Scientific communication in a post-truth society. Proceedings of the Na tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116 (16), 7656–7661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805868115
30. Merton R.K., Barber E. The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.
31. Oxford English Dictionary. Post-truth. [Elektronnyĭ resurs]. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/post-truth_adj?tab=meaning_ and_use-paywall (data obrascheniya: 21.11.2025).
32. Schäfer M.S., Metag J. (2021). Audiences of science communication between pluralisation, fragmentation and polarisation. In B. Trench (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Tech nology (pp. 291–304). London; New York: Routledge.
33. Scheufele D.A. (2014). Science communication as political communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 13585–13592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317516111
