Russian Federation
In the article, the authors emphasize the importance of a differentiated approach to managing job satisfaction in dynamic socio-economic conditions, taking into account the social structure of the staff. The importance of timely management decisions to change motivational policies in order to retain core personnel to achieve business goals and maintain stable employee efficiency is shown. It is emphasized that the social structure of the staff is constantly undergoing changes and periodic measurement of its characteristics is required in order to establish the appropriateness of management efforts to maintain the social and financial well-being of the staff and the commitment of the company during their working life at large business enterprises. It is established that the monitoring of staff self-assessment of factors of job satisfaction is an effective tool that emphasizes the interest of management in the opinion of employees. The survey methodology and the results of in-depth data analysis can provide up-to-date information for making point management decisions. As an example, the results of a study of the overall level of satisfaction with labor factors of the personnel of two large-scale enterprises and their differentiation depending on gender, age, seniority and education are given, indicating the expediency of introducing differences in labor satisfaction management. It is shown that the effectiveness of job satisfaction management depends, first of all, on the timely assessment and identification of motivational factors of distress and growth factors in the context of the social structure of the staff and on their basis the formation of a targeted approach to motivation. The main problem in this regard is the underestimation by the company’s management of the influence of age, gender, seniority and education on the level of job satisfaction; an average assessment of all factors of job satisfaction and ignoring real problem areas and the subjective significance for employees of individual factors of job satisfaction, including in the context of the social structure of the staff; orientation to invited multifunctional employees, and not the disclosure of the potential of working qualified workers.
human capital, HR strategies, social structure of personnel, monitoring of the level of job satisfaction, differentiated approach to employee motivation, potential disclosure
1. Barysheva A. V., Kikteva E. A. Motivaciya. SPb.: Izd-vo «Piter», 2014, 206 p. (in Russian)
2. Vetluzhskih E. N. Motivaciya i oplata truda. Instrumenty. Metodiki. Praktika. M.: Alpina Pablisher, 2016. 149 p. (in Russian)
3. Grinenko S.V.,Zadorozhnaya E.K., Najdenko I.S. Imperativy gendernogo ravenstva v vosproizvodstve chelovecheskogo kapitala na regionalnom urovne//TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2017, T. 15, № 4, p.70. (in Russian)
4. Ivanova, T. Yu., Rasskazova E.I., Osin E.N. Struktura i diagnostika udovletvorennosti trudom: razrabotka i aprobaciya metodiki [Elektronnyj resurs] / T.Yu. Ivanova, E.I. Rasskazova, E.N. Osin // Organizacionnaya psihologiya. 2012. №3. Rezhim dostupa: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/struktura-i-diagnostika-udovletvorennosti-trudom-razrabotka-i-aprobatsiya-metodiki - (data obrasheniya: 24.01.2018). (in Russian)
5. Malceva I.O. Gendernye razlichiya v professionalnoj mobilnosti i segregacii na rynke truda: opyt rossijskoj ekonomiki. Moskva: EERC, 2005. (in Russian)
6. Misyurina, A.Sh. Osnovnye faktory udovletvorennosti trudom na krupnom predpriyatii / A.Sh. Misyurina // Universitet im. I.V. Vernadskogo. 2011, T. 35, №4, pp.283-291. (in Russian)
7. Mirapolis NSM Kak menyaetsya podhod k upravleniyu chelovecheskimi resursami https://www.mirapolis.ru/blog/14-hr-trendov-v-upravlenii-personalom/ ( Data obrasheniya 20.12.2021.) (in Russian)
8. Mitrofanova A.E., Manvelyan G.A. Motivaciya i stimulirovanie kak osnovnoj instrument uderzhaniya personala v organizacii// Upravlenie personalom i intellektualnymi resursami v Rossii. 2021, T. 10, №1. Pp. 24-29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2305-7807-2021-10-1-24-29 . (in Russian)
9. Ponomareva O.Ya., Zvereva S.F., Karpova N.I. Upravlenie udovletvorennostyu trudom sotrudnikov posredstvom gibkoj sistemy stimulirovaniya. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii. FGBOU VO «Orenburgskij gosudarstvennyj universitet», 2018, no. 10. pp. 56-63. (in Russian)
10. Ponomareva O. Ya., Nikitina O. Yu. Instrumenty nastrojki sistemy motivacii truda personala: obzor issledovanij rossijskih uchenyh i praktikov // Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii. 2021, no. 1, pp 41-53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2021-1-41. (in Russian)
11. Skripchenko L.S. Upravlenie udovletvoryonnostyu trudom personala//Upravlenie personalom i intellektualnymi resursami v Rossii. 2020, T. 9, no.5, pp. 33-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2305-7807-2020-33-37/ . (in Russian)
12. Sokolov D.N., Zavyayalova E.K. Integraciya strategicheskih resursov organizacii v usloviyah novoj ekonomiki: konceptualnaya model/ Vestnik SPbGU. Menedzhment. 2018, T. 17, no. 1, Upravlenie chelovecheskimi resursami. Pp. 46-68. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2018.103 . (in Russian)
13. Turabaeva, F.M., Baksheev S.L. Udovletvorennost trudom - kak faktor stabilnosti personala [Elektronnyj resurs] / F.M. Turabaeva, S.L. Baksheev // Ekonomika i menedzhment innovacionnyh tehnologij. 2017,no. 3 - Rezhim dostupa: http://ekonomika.snauka.ru/2017/03/14327 - (data obrasheniya: 24.01.2018). (in Russian)
14. Hekman Dzh. R., Oldhem G., Dzhenson R., Pedi K. Novaya strategiya obogasheniya raboty / Dzh. R. Hekman, G. Oldhem, R. Dzhenson, K. Pedi // Antologiya organizacionnoj psihologii. 2005, pp124-138. (in Russian)
15. Brif A.P., Barskii A. Sozdanie klimata dlya raznoobraziya_ podavlenie predvzyatih reakcii na rabochem meste [Establishing a climate for diversity: The inhibition of prejudiced reactions in the workplace]. Issledovaniya v oblasti personala i upravleniya chelovecheskimi resursami Publ ., 2000, no.19 pp. 91-129.
16. Channar Z.A., Abassi Z., Udjan I.A. Diskriminaciya po priznaku pola v rabochei sile i ee vliyanie na sotrudnikov [Gender discrimination in workforce and its impact on the employees]. Pakistanskii jurnal kommercii i socialnih nauk Publ., 2011, T. 5, № 2, pp.177-191.
17. Kard D., Mas A., Moretti E., Saez E. Neravenstvo na rabote_ vliyanie zarabotnoi plati kolleg na udovletvorennost rabotoi [Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction]. The American Economic Review Publ., 2012 T.102, № 6, pp. 2981_3003.
18. Igli A.H., & Karli L.L. Skvoz labirint: Pravda o tom kak jenschini stanovyatsya liderami [Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders]. Boston Massachusets: Izdatelstvo Garvardskoi shkoli biznesa Publ., 2007.
19. Fedorova A., Ponomareva O. Razvitie kadrovogo potenciala universiteta kak osnovi ego intellektualnogo kapitala [Developing University HR Potential as the Basis for its Intellectual Capital], Materiali Evropeiskoi konferencii po intellektualnomu kapitalu (ecic 2017), Lopes I.T., Serraskeiro R. (red.). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited Publ., T. 2017-aprel., pp. 97-105.
20. Gordon V., Osgud Dj. L., Fillips Dj. Municipalnie slujaschie: izuchenie modeli udovletvorennosti rabotoi [Municipal clerks: Examining a model of job satisfaction]. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie personalom Publ., 2010, T.39, no 4, pp. 327-352
21. Kim S. Upravlenie na osnove uchastiya i udovletvorennost rabotoi_ uroki dlya upravlencheskogo liderstva [Participative management and job satisfaction: Lessons for management leadership]. Obzor gosudarstvennogo upravleniya Publ., 2002, T.62, no 2, pp. 231-241.
22. Li Yu.Dj., Uilkins V.M. Bolshe shodstv ili bolshe razlichii? Sravnenie motivacii raboti gosudarstvennih i nekommercheskih menedjerov [More similarities or more differences? Comparing public and nonprofit managers’ job motivations]. Obzor gosudarstvennogo upravleniya Publ., 2011, T. 71, no.1, pp. 45-56.
23. Menon N.Z., Djina L.K. Gendernoe neravenstvo, udovletvorennost rabotoi i motivaciya k rabote: dannie indiiskih sotrudnic [Gender Inequality, Gob Satisfaction and Gob Motivation: Evidence from Indian Female Employees]. Issledovaniya v oblasti menedjmenta i truda Publ., 2017, T. 42, no. 3, pp. 1-22.
24. Pauell G. N., Greivs L.M. Jenschini i mujchini v menedjmente, 3-e izd. [Women and Men in Management, 3rd ed]. Tisyacha dubov, Kaliforniya Publ., 2003, 288 p.
25. Soumya K.R., Panchanatham N. Faktori, vliyayuschie na udovletvorennost rabotoi sotrudnikov bankovskogo sektora v Chennai, Indiya [Factors influencing job satisfaction of banking sector employees in Chennai, India]. Jurnal prava i razresheniya konfliktov Publ., 2011, T. 3, no. 5, pp. 76-79.
26. Stedhem Yu., Yamamura Dj. H., Teilor D., Nelson M. Organizacionnie faktori i izmereniya udovletvorennosti: sravnitelnoe issledovanie buhgalterov v Avstralii i SShA [Organizational factors and dimensions of satisfaction: A comparative study of accountants in Australia and the US]. Avstraliiskii obzor buhgalterskogo ucheta Pubk., 2002, T. 12, no.28, pp. 32-40.
27. Togiya A., Kustelios A., Cigilis N. Udovletvorennost rabotoi sredi grecheskih akademicheskih bibliotekarei [Job satisfaction among Greek academic librarians]. Bibliotechno_informacionnie issledovaniya Publ., 2004, T. 26, no.3, pp. 373-383.
