Comparison of modeling of the polar cap absorption effect with observations at the AARI ground-based network

Дмитриев Алексей Владимирович; Долгачева Светлана Александровна; Трошичев Олег Александрович; Пулинец Мария Сергеевна

doi:10.12737/stp-103202413

УДК 53

COMPARISON OF MODELING OF THE POLAR CAP ABSORPTION EFFECT WITH OBSERVATIONS AT THE AARI GROUND-BASED NETWORK Comparison of modeling of the polar cap absorption effect with observations at the AARI ground-based network

АА Аа

Опубликовано в Solar-Terrestrial Physics · Том 10, Номер 3 · Страницы 108–120 · Рубрика: 19TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE “PLASMA PHYSICS IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM”. FEBRUARY 5–9, 2024, SPACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE RAS, MOSCOW, RUSSIA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-103202413

Получено: 19.04.2024 Одобрено: 21.06.2024 Опубликовано: 29.09.2024 Язык публикаций: ENG

Авторы

ДМ

Дмитриев Алексей Владимирович

ДО

Долгачева Светлана Александровна

ORCID

ТР

Трошичев Олег Александрович

ПУ

Пулинец Мария Сергеевна

ДМ

Дмитриев Алексей Владимирович

Научно-исследовательский институт ядерной физики им. Д.В. Скобельцина МГУ, Москва , Россия Россия · Москва

Факультет космических наук и инженерии, Национальный Центральный Университет, Тайвань Китайская Республика · Тайвань

ДО

Долгачева Светлана Александровна

Арктический и антарктический научно-исследовательский институт Россия · Санкт-Петербург

ORCID

ТР

Трошичев Олег Александрович

Ученая степень: доктор физико-математических наук

Арктический и антарктический научно-исследовательский институт Россия · Санкт-Петербург

ПУ

Пулинец Мария Сергеевна

Научно-исследовательский институт ядерной физики им. Д.В. Скобельцина МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова Россия · Москва

АННОТАЦИЯ

An elliptical model of cutoff for solar cosmic rays (SCR) at high latitudes has been calculated for SCR events and geomagnetic storms that occurred in February, March, and September 2014, June 2015, and September 2017 in order to predict the polar cap absorption (PCA) effect. The prediction is compared with observations of the PCA effect at the AARI network of six ionosondes, located in the north of Russia in a wide range of longitudes from 30 to 170 and magnetic latitudes from 56 to 64. We examine the dependence of the cutoff latitude on the magnetic storm strength, as well as the effect of additional ionization of the dayside and nightside ionosphere by SCR protons and electrons. The model demonstrates a satisfactory statistical accuracy up to 0.83 for the PCA prediction. We discuss prospects for further improvement of the elliptical model, such as consideration of the impact of SCRs of higher energies and inclusion of the PC index of energy flux into the polar cap.

КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА

solar cosmic rays, geomagnetic cutoff, high-latitude ionosphere, ionosondes, polar cap absorption

Текст

Текст (PDF)

Читать Скачать

1. Birch M.J., Hargreaves J.K., Senior A., Bromage B.J.I. Variations in cutoff latitude during selected solar energetic proton events. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 2005, vol. 110, A07221. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010833.

2. Clilverd M.A., Rodger C.J., Moffat-Griffin T., Verronen P.T. Improved dynamic geomagnetic rigidity cutoff modeling: Testing predictive accuracy. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, vol. 112, p. A08302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012410.

3. Dmitriev A.V., Tsai L.-C., Yeh H.-C., Chang C.-C. COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 tomography of SEP ionization in the polar cap. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008, vol. 35, p. L22108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036146.

4. Dmitriev A.V., Jayachandran P.T., Tsai L.-C. Elliptical model of cutoff boundaries for the solar energetic particles measured by POES satellites in December 2006. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, vol. 115, p. A12244. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015380.

5. Gold R.E., Krimigis S.M., Hawkins S.E., Haggerty D.K., et al. Electron, Proton and Alpha Monitor on the Advanced Composition Explorer Spacecraft. Space Sci. Rev. 1998, vol. 86, pp. 541–562.

6. Heino E., Partamies N. Observational validation of cutoff models as boundaries of solar proton event impact area. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 2020, vol. 125, e2020JA027935. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027935.

7. Jayachandran P.T., Macdougall J.W., Langley R.B., Langley R.B., Sajan C. Mishini. Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network (CHAIN). Radio Sci. 2009, vol. 44, p. RS0A03. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RS004046.

8. Kallenrode M.-B. Current views on impulsive and gradual solar energetic particle events. J. Physics G: Nuclear Phys. 2003, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 965–981. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/29/5/316.

9. Kalishin A.S., Blagoveshchenskaya N.F., Troshichev O.A., Frank-Kamenetskii A.V. AARI: High-latitude geophysical research. RFBR J. 2020, no. 3-4 (107-108), pp. 60–78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22204/2410-4639-2020-106-107-3-4-60-78. (In Russian).

10. Kress B.T., Mertens C.J., Wiltberger M. Solar energetic particle cutoff variations during the 29–31 October 2003 geomagnetic storm. Space Weather. 2010, vol. 8, p. 5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2009SW000488.

11. Little C.G., Leinbach H. Some measurements of high-latitude ionospheric absorption using extraterrestrial radio waves. Proc. IRE. 1958, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 334–348. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1958.286795.

12. Little C.G., Leinbach H. The Riometer. A device for the continuous measurement of ionospheric absorption. Proc. IRE. 1959, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 315–320. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1959.287299.

13. Rodger C.J., Clilverd M.A., Verronen P.T., Ulich T. Dynamic geomagnetic rigidity cutoff variations during a solar proton event. J. Geophys. Res. 2006, vol. 111, no. A4, p. A04222. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011395.

14. Smart D., Shea M. Fifty years of progress in geomagnetic cutoff rigidity determinations. Adv. Space Res. 2009, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1107–1123. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.07.005.

15. Vystavnoi V.M., Makarova L.N., Shirochkov A.V., Egorova L.V. Research into high-latitude ionosphere by vertical sounding with the modern digital ionosonde CADI. Heliogeophys. Res. 2013, no. 4, pp. 1–10. (In Russian).

16. URL: https://cdaweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/ (accessed July 23, 2024).

17. URL: https://wdc.kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp/wdc/Sec3.html (accessed July 23, 2024).

PDF JATS XML

Главный редактор

Жеребцов Гелий Александрович

solater@iszf.irk.ru

Заместитель главного редактора

Степанов Александр Владимирович

stepanov@gaoran.ru

Заместитель главного редактора

Потапов Александр Сергеевич

potapov@iszf.irk.ru

Ответственный секретарь редакции

Полюшкина Наталья Александровна

npol@iszf.irk.ru

3043

загрузки

ГОСТ

Дмитриев А. В., Долгачева С. А., Трошичев О. А., Пулинец М. С. Comparison of modeling of the polar cap absorption effect with observations at the AARI ground-based network // Solar-Terrestrial Physics. 2024. № 3. С. 108-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-103202413. (дата обращения: 23.10.2026).

MLA

Дмитриев Алексей Владимирович, Долгачева С. А., Трошичев О. А., Пулинец М. С.. "Comparison of modeling of the polar cap absorption effect with observations at the AARI ground-based network." Solar-Terrestrial Physics 10.3 (2024): 108-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-103202413.

APA

Дмитриев А. В., Долгачева С. А., Трошичев О. А., Пулинец М. С. (2024). Comparison of modeling of the polar cap absorption effect with observations at the AARI ground-based network. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 10(3), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-103202413

Chicago

Дмитриев Алексей Владимирович, Долгачева С. А., Трошичев О. А., Пулинец М. С.. "Comparison of modeling of the polar cap absorption effect with observations at the AARI ground-based network." Solar-Terrestrial Physics 10, no. 3 (2024): 108-120. https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-103202413.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Дмитриев А. В., Долгачева С. А., Трошичев О. А., Пулинец М. С. | title = Comparison of modeling of the polar cap absorption effect with observations at the AARI ground-based network | journal = Solar-Terrestrial Physics | year = 2024 | volume = 10 | issue = 3 | pages = 108-120 | doi = 10.12737/stp-103202413 }}

Скопировать

Экспорт: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

COMPARISON OF MODELING OF THE POLAR CAP ABSORPTION EFFECT WITH OBSERVATIONS AT THE AARI GROUND-BASED NETWORK Comparison of modeling of the polar cap absorption effect with observations at the AARI ground-based network

Подтверждение